Comments: 15
plasmid1 [2012-09-29 23:08:30 +0000 UTC]
no, you still dont get it ..nvm ..stay medieval!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LordGood In reply to plasmid1 [2012-10-21 08:46:03 +0000 UTC]
Best course of action!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MacabreAustereRelume [2012-05-25 00:40:43 +0000 UTC]
It looks so rough up close but intricate and well shaded far away.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LachlanTemplar [2012-05-12 18:23:36 +0000 UTC]
I see an abstract birds-eye view of an American Indian village.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LordGood In reply to LachlanTemplar [2012-05-15 20:48:59 +0000 UTC]
I could see it painted on a hide of some animal
sort of Sioux
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dairychris [2012-05-12 17:05:07 +0000 UTC]
What are you expressing? Is it man's ultimate failure to collocate his most basest insecurities about his position in regards to the universe?
Or is it just scribbles, 'cause I'm getting a little of both.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LordGood In reply to Dairychris [2012-05-15 18:48:58 +0000 UTC]
I'll lean a little closer to the scribbles on that one
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mrchuyito [2012-05-12 01:39:42 +0000 UTC]
well that is very mmmm exotic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LordGood In reply to mrchuyito [2012-05-12 03:14:40 +0000 UTC]
There's one way to put it xP
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LordGood In reply to MicheleHansen [2012-05-12 03:14:15 +0000 UTC]
Nah, this isnt a recognizable structure to, ah, cube, nor do I employ cubism on a whole,
Dada is just goofy
I think this would fall between expressionism and surrealism
If i was abstracting an actual subject it could be De Stijl
but you could be right
i dont really know what im talking about ;-;
xP
👍: 0 ⏩: 1