Comments: 21
ltiana355 In reply to undefinedreference [2016-07-02 18:44:54 +0000 UTC]
noble of you to think of the public. i'm mostly thinking of myself - stimulating my brain cells with colours and shapes. i feel frustrated when i haven't done it for a while. but uploading stuff to da gives the exercise sort of purpose.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
undefinedreference In reply to ltiana355 [2016-07-02 19:57:14 +0000 UTC]
Actually it's simply a matter of me as a human being having only a limited amount of daily concentration and focus at my disposal, which are actively being depleted during the day. Combined with the fact that my autistic brains have the agility of a supertanker, and supertankers are extremely un-agile as you probably know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ltiana355 In reply to undefinedreference [2016-07-02 20:25:46 +0000 UTC]
hm, my autistic brain wants to 'play' at the end of the day. especially if the day has been too people-intensive or work-intensive. some minutes of 'gimping' restore the energy levels - especially if i'm satisfied with the result.
unfortunately, some times gimping has to be postponed until the next day or the weekend.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ltiana355 In reply to undefinedreference [2016-07-04 10:38:56 +0000 UTC]
to each their own (way of entertainment) - you can grumble, i can play - as long as everybody is happy.
otherwise the process sounds familiar - we only call it with different names.
but i don't think you can tempt me with russian ideology/propaganda - i got too much of it in my first 14 years.
when it comes to art or 'art', i'm not very interested in the ideology/theory/contemporary context. the only thing that matters is the impression it leaves me with. i don't want to put it into words.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
undefinedreference In reply to ltiana355 [2016-07-04 16:29:05 +0000 UTC]
I have pretty much the same attitude towards art: either it makes an impact on my psyche or it doesn't. No need for lengthy art-historic elaborations. I don't care. There's a museum near where I live that has a painting that apparently represents a breakthrough in late 19th century art, which makes it "great". The only problem I have with it is that as an artwork in itself it's utterly mediocre. It leaves no impression on me whatsoever. And I wouldn't like to be tricked into looking at it as a great work of art just because its role in art history.
With Russian Cosmism it's a different thing. It's a curious mix of Christianity and Theosophy, which happen to be philosophical-ideological opposites, if not enemies. I don't care too much about Christianity, I'm not diametrically opposed to it but it isn't that much my concern either, but Theosophy, as one of the more ideologically aggressive manifestations of "mysticism" (New Age, blah blah), really stands for pretty much everything I don't believe in or believe is harmful to the human psyche and society in general. Yet at the same time some of the artists whose work I admire most (Ensor, Malevich, Kandinsky, Mondriaan, Scriabin, Roslavets) were deeply involved in it. Two of the key notions that drove these artists, also found in Russian Cosmism, were (a) their art was capable of "spiritualizing" material reality1 and (b) the Holy Task of an artist is to create life. There's a Mondriaan in that same museum nearby, and trust me, if you stand in front of it you might feel that it is indeed really ALIVE. Or at least I did. So there's ample room for curiosity here. Plus it gives me a chance to work on my Russian.
1 This one's hilarious, about Scriabin:
" Scriabin considered his last music to be fragments of an immense piece to be called Mysterium. This seven-day-long megawork would be performed at the foothills of the Himalayas in India, after which the world would dissolve in bliss. " - www.scriabinsociety.com/biogra…
Malevich too believe that through the sheer transformational power of his art, by the end of the 20th century the world would have transgressed from a material phase into a spiritual one. Which obviously hasn't happened (yet), but nonetheless, interesting idea. It's the "art = life" thing that I'm more interested in myself. Maybe it doesn't need any underlying ideology after all, and it's just a matter of talent.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Win128 [2016-06-23 19:49:58 +0000 UTC]
looks interesting
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jdart2014 [2016-06-23 09:53:15 +0000 UTC]
Lovely composition!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Multiartis [2016-06-23 06:19:17 +0000 UTC]
Great image and composition.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1