HOME | DD
LuadoChackal β Hiiro No Kakera
Published: 2012-07-09 23:31:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 10692; Favourites: 695; Downloads: 126
Redirect to original
Description
Hiiro No Kakera rereading of crayonsHiiro No Kakera releitura em lΓ‘pis de cor
Related content
Comments: 207
How am I acting like a child? DA doesn't give a damn about copyrights and theft. Art thieves get away with everything. I saw an art thief stay on here for 3 years when they were reported by the original artists and proof was given.
Lol, no, it's not. If it is made 100% by yourself, it is fine. Tracing and then trying to pass it as fan art isn't.
Tracing =/= making it by scratch. Holy shit 
The artist better hope Kazuki doesn't find out. Stuff like this gets people sued.
It is so sad people support theft. Very sad. No wonder so many people leave the site.
π: 0 β©: 3
.... just realized this person is defending art theft to the death because their shit is traced. [link] [link]
π: 0 β©: 2
Aww, and she had to do it of Frodo? Frodo is so badass! Why...how could someone do that to the poor boy
π: 0 β©: 0
Well shit son! Talk about a talentless hack.
π: 0 β©: 1
Explains why they're throwing a hissy fit. I skimmed her comments to other people and actually can't believe a person would actually like this.
π: 0 β©: 1
I know. I guess she wants to be sued too.
π: 0 β©: 0
your story it either made up or that artist had no proof their art was stolen 
i see you're a very righteous person but the real world doesn't work like that, dA allows tracing, recoloring, traced bases etc. you need to wake up to the real world. You don't understand ANY fanart goes against copyright and it's still allowed
i see you don't understand a word i'm saying so i'll just give up trying to make you see my point
if you want to keep raging on this deviant, go ahead, maybe some day you'll grow up and realize how futile that is
π: 0 β©: 1
I asssure you, it isn't. The name of the deviant was and she wa a troll and a theif. I bet you she has an ED article, look her up.
Fanart doesn't go against copyright if it was made yourself. I think you are cofused on why exactly copyrights are. I don't understand what you are saying, correct, because what you are saying makes no sense
I'm not raging on the deviant, and I am not raging at all. I gave my opinion on the whole thing. How this is really depressing, stupid, and just, well, sad. I have every right to be angry though, but I'm not a child and I don't rage in all caps.
Grow up? Funny, considering you give me crap that doesn't make sense then give the "oh well you don't understand" excuse.
π: 0 β©: 1
that account is deactivated so you have no proof, therefore i don't believe you :/ you know the rule, photo or didn't happen
fanart does go against copyright, there was a recent discussion about fanart hosted by dA on comic con where a lawyer talked about fanart. many people are not aware of this but ANY forms of fanart if it's public, it's illegal. the only way for fanart to be legal is if you keep it in your home and never show it to anybody. It might make no sense to you but it is the truth.
who's being childish here? you're the one being all 'oh geez, oh gosh' and so on, that is childish behavior in my opinion
π: 0 β©: 1
Search her name on DA and you willfibs fanart for her. Search her name on ED and you will most likely get tons of links to her crap. And I'd to search her name and look at Te comments, you will see. I'm typing on an iPod currently, an I don't know how to copy and paste stuff. When I get my computer I'll do it.
Oh, it's the truth? Link me to it please. No link? Didn't happen.
Looool, you just made my day
π: 0 β©: 1
i searched for her name and all i found was a bunch of drawings of wolfs, i don't see how that proves anything? :/
here's the link [link]
π: 0 β©: 1
Did you go to her deviations and look at the comments? And did you go to ED?
π: 0 β©: 1
so there was some people calling her a thief, that doesn't prove that the original artist reported her to dA with proof and dA didn't listen :/
and i didn't find any ED article on her name
π: 0 β©: 1
The original artists left comments to the originals, and I noted one or two when it was happening. But they left comments.
Then she must not have one I guess.
π: 0 β©: 0
DA needs to put its foot down.
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm actually pretty sure this deviation itself isn't against the rules OR the law; it's not for sale, and it's not the original image, rather a rendition of an existing image. Does that make sense? Like, the artist technically drew this themselves, but looking at the original image the entire time and copying it as closely as they could. They should've credited the original artist, but other than that I don't think it violates anything in the TOS.
Besides, this isn't the first time dA has given a DD to a deviation that should never have gotten one - before, they gave one to a photograph that was completely stolen xD
π: 0 β©: 1
Doesn't matter if it is for sale or not. By posting it, they automatically claim iot as theirs when it is not. They did not have permission to post, and therefore it is stolen and breaks copyright laws.
Renditions can only be put up if the picture is stock, or they had permission.
It's sad how it happens tough. Stolen stuff getting DDs. It's very sad.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hmm, really? And yet dA has a traced base category...gotta wonder why they don't remove that like they removed this deviation's DD xD
Thanks for clarifying that! I wasn't completely sure myself, since I've seen tons of images like this that never get removed.
Yeah, I wish the suggesters/CVs did more research before giving a DD. It happens quite often :/
π: 0 β©: 1
With bases, they are allowed as long as you claim you don't own the image and then link. If they use someone else's deviation, they have to get permission first, or they can use stock. That's usually what I see.
Yea. As long as there is permission, or the image is stock, it's fine. Just gotta link I think.
Sadly, yea. Then they just take the DD away, but leave the stolen image.
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't believe I've ever seen a base that had gotten permission from the original artist before making/posting the base. Most of them credit image hosting sites as well, rather than the original artist's account or website.
I thought you had to do more than link back/credit? FAQ #306: Does "Crediting" let me use whatever I want?
yeah, it's a shame :/
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't see many that use other deviations on DA. There are probably some, but they are either stolen, or have permission. The rest are used with stock, or stolen too.
If you use legal copyrighted work you have to have permission. Like, if you tried to do it from a movie, or another person's art. If it is a stock image, it is free to use for anyone so you could make a base and just link I believe.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, most of them are from artists on pixiv that are reposted on image hosting sites like zerochan or photobucket :/ I'd guess that something like 90% of traced bases are not made from stock or with permission.
Ah, I see :>
π: 0 β©: 1
Yea. The good ones are though. Some bases are even made without a picture, and there are many of those. However, many traced bases are stolen. Some aren't, but many are.
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh, yes, I agree! I'm fully supportive of original pixel artists/dollers who make/use original or stock-referenced bases because I do believe that requires a lot of skill, I just don't approve of stolen ones!
π: 0 β©: 1
Same here. Whats worse is that the people who make the stolen ones can't accept the fact that they stole, refuse to take them down, and block anyone who tries to help.
π: 0 β©: 0
I have lost all faith in DA.....not that I had a lot, only a tiny bit.
Grats people who run this site, you basically honored an art thief, by giving them a DD. I thought not banned art thieves was bad, but this, holy shit.
π: 0 β©: 1
Draw 1 by yourself and when someone will report you just show them that image
π: 0 β©: 0
Here's the original image. [link]
π: 0 β©: 0
This is the original. [link]
π: 0 β©: 0
I feel sorry for the original artist :c
π: 0 β©: 0
Original by Kazuki Yone.
π: 0 β©: 0
The original: [link]
π: 0 β©: 0
I thought copying or tracing was illegal on DA. Well, super I'm going to copy one like this one *-*
π: 0 β©: 1
That's because it is. This could get them sued.
π: 0 β©: 0
Amazing colors and details - congrats on the DD
π: 0 β©: 1
Congratulations! You really deserve the DD, this piece looks incredible! I'm so happy that I found you so your wonderful art could be shared with everyone^-^
π: 0 β©: 1
The original [link]
π: 0 β©: 0
Congrats on the well deserved DD!
Have a nice day!
π: 0 β©: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>