Comments: 12
painthings [2011-05-13 06:11:35 +0000 UTC]
The darkness in this piece thrills me
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
iimonkeefunkii [2009-02-27 07:35:58 +0000 UTC]
That is a terrifying, but incredibly cool justice. Also, thanks for adding the description of Justice in there, I'd never read that before. Very much appreciated.
I think those orbs on the sides are fine, but if you wanted to replace them...maybe with...something signifying support and opposition. What the hell would that be? Or balance...Obviously I suck at ideas and advice. The best advice I can think of is...don't run with sharp objects. Yeah, I suck.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Eyelids-pie [2009-02-15 10:21:01 +0000 UTC]
That cube's got a cock slot!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ballistyc [2009-02-14 02:18:28 +0000 UTC]
This is a very interesting interpretation..
...I have to applaud you for finding originality with this image,
because this could have easily become another redundant
re-creation of the scales of justice...
Im really liking the simple composition, with just enough
information for the audience to gather their thoughts, but I
find those little "yo-yo" type orbs on the sides to be a little
distracting and out of place.
....and just based off of my initial glance of the image I thought
that this could have been an unique and modern interpretation
of the mythical "Gorgon".
Awesome stuff!!
take care...drive safely
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LyndsayHarper In reply to Ballistyc [2009-02-14 12:11:29 +0000 UTC]
Thanks,
You think i should have removed the scales?
I thought that strengthened it's portrayal of "Justice"
Anyway, just an idea im playing with.
It was based on: [link]
from a previous page.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ballistyc In reply to LyndsayHarper [2009-02-15 01:43:05 +0000 UTC]
hmmm that's interesting....
I think the scales work much better in
your previous drawing.
I suppose your piece could work independently
without the scales and the audience could
still have enough information to grasp the
concept, but I don't think you should remove
them.
The thing is that right now the scales
could be seen as distracting, or not
distracting enough.....does that make
any sense???...haha
They seem to be an after-thought compared
to the rest of the drawing. While the way
you approached the scales in your other
drawing is more cohesive...it flows.
I might be making a big deal out of nothing
though....hmmm.....I don't know...
Oh wait....you know what?
I think the difference is in the length of
the strings holding the scales. It appears to
be half the length in your original drawing
that makes it work much better...
THe longer strings seem to throw off the balance
and unity of the piece...
As you can tell I tend to over-analyze things...haha
I love the piece though....
....and once again compliments on the unique interpretation.
take care...drive safely
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LyndsayHarper In reply to Ballistyc [2009-02-15 02:24:45 +0000 UTC]
Well i also over analyse. It's good to see things no one else sees.
I see what your saying, when i was drawing it, i thought that the length of the strings was equal to the dimensions of the box.
I'm not sure where to go with this. Whether to draw it again... I think I'm going to draw it from different perspectives.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The5Elements [2009-02-14 01:24:27 +0000 UTC]
Just... wow. O.o
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mathematix [2009-02-13 12:01:51 +0000 UTC]
Awesome!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hatefueled [2009-02-13 11:52:50 +0000 UTC]
wow. very awesome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0