Comments: 67
Macuarrorro In reply to ??? [2016-10-29 04:59:57 +0000 UTC]
I can't wait to have a Salandit.
Btw, they seemed real since the beginning
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheAtlanticGundam [2016-10-27 14:35:14 +0000 UTC]
Wish confirmed, they're so real
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Macuarrorro In reply to TheAtlanticGundam [2016-10-28 05:41:08 +0000 UTC]
wow, I did this in July? it feels like yesterday, but it's been a while already
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SirArceon [2016-10-27 14:29:21 +0000 UTC]
Decisions, decisions...
...Seriously, brain, decide already. We've only got like 24 DAYS.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Macuarrorro In reply to AllenRavenix [2016-10-23 04:55:52 +0000 UTC]
Sorry for not replying soon, but yeah, I knew they were real
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jadewingedcheetah [2016-08-02 23:52:54 +0000 UTC]
These suck so bad. Hope it's fake.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DaAnimeGoatman In reply to jadewingedcheetah [2016-08-20 18:40:25 +0000 UTC]
Hate to break it to ya... not, but there are some elements proves that these are real.
"New Pokémon based on a dolphin, sea cucumber, snowman, mushroom and a rugby monkey are there."
There was a mushroom and sea cucumber pokemon that were confirmed to be real. Also there is Mallow who appeared in the August 1st trailer.
Sources
www.serebii.net/sunmoon/pokemo…
pokejungle.net/2016/08/01/chin…
Have a nice day.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Macuarrorro In reply to ShironaKarius [2016-08-02 05:27:58 +0000 UTC]
I know! A water-type Growlithe!! I can't even imagine
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Macuarrorro In reply to KelseyEdward [2016-08-02 05:26:56 +0000 UTC]
can't wait for that sea cucumber Pokémon
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
norarosa [2016-07-26 18:06:56 +0000 UTC]
Is Fake
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
TeamFortressGoddess [2016-07-22 22:52:48 +0000 UTC]
Everyone is hating on these evolutions credibility because Litten may not come out as how they all expected. Plus, it may also be a Fire/Fighting type; which according to everyone, is a sin now. I'm not a big fan of Panthster either, but it doesn't make it any less of a good Pokemon. It also doesn't effect the other starters in any way. It's always that way with fans, they see one design they don't like and suddenly awesome designs have zero value. It's like the first odd design is cutting the red wire and blowing up the bomb, casting aside the awesome new aspects
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
DaAnimeGoatman In reply to TeamFortressGoddess [2016-07-26 23:54:43 +0000 UTC]
I kind of fall into that category but at the same time don't.
I mean, I hate these designs, but at the same time love them. They do have some red flags in it but at least (If these are real) Game Freak tried to make designs that look great. Personally, I'd go with either Litten or Popplio's final evolution.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Macuarrorro In reply to TeamFortressGoddess [2016-07-23 03:53:14 +0000 UTC]
that will keep happening with every generation
I've really liked all the new Pokémon so far, I just think they're too many animals, like, they don't have just a few animal-like features, they all look like true animals, except just for a few, this generation looks like a zoo, when I think the Pokémon should be more like fictional creatures, but I like them anyway.
The starters are always the biggest concern, but that's why you get to choose between 3 of them, and you can always bring back your favorite Pokémon from older games so... If these are real, yeah, the fire one would be my least favorite, but I think it's still better than Emboar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ChibiMusouka [2016-07-17 17:00:43 +0000 UTC]
Having seen those for a while now, for me they - sadly - look quite convincing.
I've got nothing against the supposed evolutions for Rowlet and Poplio.
But that wrsetling-tiger? No. Just, no. I really love littens design. But why make the final form of the fire starter bipedal - again? And even if it's not a fighting type, why make it look like a fighter - again? And on top, I totally hate the design... Really, even if it's a wrestler, in my opinion they could have made a way better design for that concept. It looks way too cartoony with those weird pranks...
The day those are officially confirmed I'm probably gonna cry
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Guillaume101 In reply to ChibiMusouka [2016-07-27 09:28:32 +0000 UTC]
It's not a fighting type. It's a dark type.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChibiMusouka In reply to Guillaume101 [2016-07-27 14:20:25 +0000 UTC]
Like I've written ^^
"[...] even if it's not a fighting type, why make it look like a fighter [...]"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DaAnimeGoatman In reply to ChibiMusouka [2016-07-27 00:58:05 +0000 UTC]
I have some ideas they could use to change Litten's supposed final evolution. Just make the claws less cartoony, give it a body design that could change to a sort of biped-quodroped style and remove anything fighting type-ish and it could work.
But we just have to wait until the real final evolutions are released.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Macuarrorro In reply to ChibiMusouka [2016-07-18 04:48:34 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I'm expecting something like an actual panther or so, but considering there are too few quadrupedal, fully evolved starters, I wouldn't be surprised if they make it bipedal, even if these are fake.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChibiMusouka In reply to Macuarrorro [2016-07-27 14:23:37 +0000 UTC]
Even if I'm not a fan of a bipedal litten evo, I could live with it if it just was another design than this thing...
Maybe make it look more like a rogue or thief, that would fit the dark type well. It's really irking me that it looks like a fighter again.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ShironaKarius [2016-07-14 23:19:45 +0000 UTC]
I doubt that they are fake, there are too many evidences to proove they're real to say that they are. If they are fake, then they woudn't match this graph with Fire Types based on the Chinese Zodiac, Grass Types on Prehistoric animals, and Water Types on Weapons, like the other past starters.
As you can see, Panthster is obviously based on the Chinese Zodiac, not to mention inspired by one of Ken Sugimori's favorite anime series, Tiger Mask. Robingroot, though based on Haast's Eagle, the giant prehistoric eagle of New Zealand, may have it's name misread as Robinroot, as in ''Robin Hood + Root'', and lastly, Entermaid, if you look at it's hip and tail, is based on a spiked club.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Macuarrorro In reply to ShironaKarius [2016-07-15 04:48:18 +0000 UTC]
well I wish they're real, but we can't really know at this point
I saw that chart too, I could've never figured it out
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MawileMage [2016-07-13 22:14:09 +0000 UTC]
These are probably fake, which is a shame, because I LOVE Entermaid's design. I'd pick Popplio in a heartbeat if that one was real.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Macuarrorro In reply to MawileMage [2016-07-14 06:48:17 +0000 UTC]
I know! lol If these are fake, are definitely the best I've seen so far. I'd love to know who made them if that's the case.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Arisu95 [2016-07-11 15:33:34 +0000 UTC]
I think these are fake, Entermaid looks too feminine and all the starters have always had a 'gender-neutral' look in all of the past generations.
I highly doubt Litten's evo will be Fire/Fighting, nothing in Litten's design or description makes you think of a fighting evolution (actually, the description may lead more to Fire/Poison, also considering the alchemic symbol, and its design may lead to think of Fire/Dark too). Also, come on, most of those Fake evolutions make Litten a fighting type just to troll everyone with the 'too many fire/fighting starters' meme.
Robingroot seems quite plausible, but I hope it'll be a bit bigger and more 'flying bird' looking.
Also, Rowlet's descriptions points at the fact that it has leaves under its wings, I think this will be developed in its evolution rather than dropped.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Macuarrorro In reply to Arisu95 [2016-07-14 06:46:34 +0000 UTC]
Well, the "Litten evolution" is supposedly Fire/Dark, even though it looks muscular. That would be too masculine for a female as well. Machoke, Machamp, Mr. Mime, Hariyama, etc say hi.
I do agree Entermaid would look too feminine, but then we have Gardevoir. So I don't know, they must be fake since they "leaked" almost a month ago and nothing has happened, but I really liked their designs whether they're real or not.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Arisu95 In reply to Macuarrorro [2016-07-14 11:09:55 +0000 UTC]
The person who leaked the names and the one who leaked the pictures are not the same, so if the names leak is fake (though it may be not), then Litten's evo could be Fire/Fighting. Well, that's what I heard, might be wrong. Though with such a design I find it hard to believe it wouldn't be Fire/Fighting unless Game Freak realized too late that it'd be the umpteenth fire/fighting and made it dark type despite the design ...
Yes, I know some Pokemon are strongly gendered in appearance, but I'm saying that it never happened with Starters in particular and I'd find it very weird if it happened now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Macuarrorro In reply to Arisu95 [2016-07-15 04:51:09 +0000 UTC]
Maybe they want to be more minorities-friendly? lol I don't know, I find it strange too, but with every generation they do stranger things, so I wouldn't be that surprise
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Karasu-96 In reply to Arisu95 [2016-07-11 19:46:14 +0000 UTC]
As much as I'm skeptical about these evolutions, Delphox looks very feminine, and it still has the same gender ratio, and Samurott looks very masculine thanks to its mustache and beard.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Arisu95 In reply to Karasu-96 [2016-07-11 20:36:11 +0000 UTC]
I don't think they look as 'gendered' as this Popplio evolution.
I have never thought that Samurott looks masculine, to be honest. I have never really seen its extra fur as mustaches or beard ... Many animals have whiskers or such things.
As regards Delphox, I also don't see it as very feminine? xD Delphox is inspired to a magician and its fur seems to me more like a monk/magician robe rather than a feminine dress. Also, Delphox has whiskers as well.
This Popplio evolution, instead, seems to be based on a mermaid, which is a female-only creature. This would make it way more 'gendered' looking than Samurott or Delphox, as a concept.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
UMSAuthorLava [2016-07-10 19:33:58 +0000 UTC]
Where does the name Entermaid come from? I mean the "enter" part.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Macuarrorro In reply to UMSAuthorLava [2016-07-11 04:19:45 +0000 UTC]
I suppose it comes from entertainment. The person who claimed that info, said it was supposed to be some kind of mermaid that lures its crowd with its singing voice or something, so I suppose it would be inspired in some kind of show, like from the circus or something mixed with the concept of a mermaid.
As I keep saying in other comments, they still can be fake, and as far as I understand, the pictures and the names come from different sources. Which makes it kinda more reliable, but at the same time the person that said the names probably just took the images as a reference to come up with the fake names.
I'm really not well informed about the rumors, but I understand the images and part of the info comes from China. And the person that dropped the names was supposedly working for the France localization team, but got fired. This last person also said there's gonna be some kind of beaver that's gonna fight like copying the style of other Pokémon (kinda like Smeargle I guess) and a gorilla Pokémon that's gonna be Ground/Fighting. But who knows.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
UMSAuthorLava In reply to Macuarrorro [2016-07-11 17:32:30 +0000 UTC]
Hmm, Ground/Fighting IS a tantalizing combo that's yet to be done. I hope we do see that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Macuarrorro In reply to UMSAuthorLava [2016-07-14 07:15:59 +0000 UTC]
I just noticed the latest Pokémon, the bear/panda and the ghost disguised as Pikachu, kinda match the descriptions of a gorilla/big creature and a rodent that imitates in some way other Pokémon, except for the typing.
Maybe I'm reaching too much, but the first thing that I thought when I saw them was that "bit of information" from tumblr or I don't know where I read it lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Livael [2016-07-10 17:04:34 +0000 UTC]
Rowlet and Popplio are kinda okay, but Litten is ugly as shit (not your drawing I mean ! The Pokémon !) Litten has so much potential they can't decently waste it doing something like that...
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
| Next =>