HOME | DD

madaigual — Scores to Settle

Published: 2012-05-06 14:37:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 3600; Favourites: 39; Downloads: 278
Redirect to original
Description DOF is something else, isn't it?
Related content
Comments: 10

Meowth79 [2015-08-16 15:52:18 +0000 UTC]

She looks great too but amazing job on her surroundings! That area she's in is so cool!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Count-Phoenix [2013-05-18 06:56:47 +0000 UTC]

It is when you produce this kind of scene.A redhead in period costume, nicely done

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NICELabs [2013-04-03 20:00:42 +0000 UTC]

Gorgeous scene and indeed great use of DoF Bravo!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

madaigual In reply to NICELabs [2013-04-03 22:36:01 +0000 UTC]

A blast from the past..almost a year old and Pre-sub surface scattering. It seemed strange to put all the detail intoi the background knowing I was going to blur it out later

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NICELabs In reply to madaigual [2013-04-04 00:20:02 +0000 UTC]

yah, but those details still come through. A spot, even blurred without the correct details would look wrong to us.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

madaigual [2012-05-16 20:10:49 +0000 UTC]

"Depth of Field", where the camera "defocuses" the background. I think DAZ3D uses it but I use Cinema4D - It's a nice effect , isn't it? But it eats processor power!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ascavilya In reply to madaigual [2013-04-02 10:23:51 +0000 UTC]

Both Daz Studio and Poser can render using DOF. It's not so much that the camera "defocuses" the background, but more that it focuses on a particular subject this making the less sharp. I can't say I've ever seen it chew up processing power in Daz but in some cases it's simpler and easier to replicate the effect in photoshop when you layer the various elements of your piece to create the final image.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

madaigual In reply to Ascavilya [2013-04-02 10:40:27 +0000 UTC]

With C4D it used to double the render time and was totally incompatible with dynamic hair . I've learnt some odds and ends over the year and what I've been doing of late is to render the scene, blur the render and then use this as a background for the next render [link] ... Same difference really?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ascavilya In reply to madaigual [2013-04-02 13:50:02 +0000 UTC]

Ouch. Sounds like you've come up with the best way of being about to achieve the same result with less pain and suffering, and that's always a good thing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

squirrelmobster [2012-05-16 19:59:35 +0000 UTC]

What is DOF? What poser program did you use to make this?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0