Comments: 4
Malicious-Monkey In reply to Zippo4k [2014-04-13 16:08:05 +0000 UTC]
Agreed. Just because you might need a magnifying glass to see the details doesn't make insects and worms any less important, or even less charismatic. Hell, beetles are some of the flashiest animals Earth has to offer and yet all people will talk about are pandas and tigers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zippo4k In reply to Malicious-Monkey [2014-04-13 16:37:34 +0000 UTC]
I personally find building analogues to insects some of the most challenging feats in speculative biology. It's something I feel few have really been able to pull off admirably ("Nereus" comes to mind).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Malicious-Monkey In reply to Zippo4k [2014-04-13 16:46:10 +0000 UTC]
One thing that makes insect analogues difficult is that insects themselves are so sophisticated, so ubiquitous, that anything we come up with will probably be inferior. In a world without insects or something equally successful, their niches would have to be filled by species from many clades, not just one. Otherwise we'll probably end up with a group that's basically a copy of insects because nobody else can quite compete.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0