Comments: 28
beyondyonder [2015-01-06 23:34:47 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for your image. I haven't used it yet, but I plan to
π: 0 β©: 0
IvannaDark [2013-02-26 20:10:52 +0000 UTC]
Thanks a lot for your magnificent, amazing photo! Used here: [link]
π: 0 β©: 0
KismetGOM [2012-12-23 05:53:38 +0000 UTC]
I used your great stock here [link] and here [link] . Thank you (:
π: 0 β©: 0
PerlaMarina [2012-11-14 21:41:03 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for the stock, i used it here [link]
π: 0 β©: 0
akimabotanicals [2012-10-23 03:31:58 +0000 UTC]
I have used your image as a description for my perfume oil, Bonfire. Here is the link: [link]
You are credited in the description. I had to adjust the size for Etsy, and I added my logo. I hope that's ok. If needed, please contact me via Etsy convo. Beautiful work!
π: 0 β©: 0
Foxfires [2010-08-31 16:50:15 +0000 UTC]
Hey thanks so much for the use of this photo! It's a great shot! Here is what I used it in:
[link]
π: 0 β©: 0
myrrhmaid319 [2010-08-17 03:01:28 +0000 UTC]
Nice!
π: 0 β©: 0
thelonesoldier [2007-03-14 20:29:17 +0000 UTC]
Under the assumption that you just chose the wrong license (since this is a stock account and the description is tailored for stock), I went ahead and used this image... I hope that's okay. [link]
π: 0 β©: 0
thelonesoldier [2007-03-14 18:37:44 +0000 UTC]
The license you've selected specifies no derivative works, which is not in keeping with stock images.
π: 0 β©: 1
thelonesoldier In reply to manaphoto-stock [2007-04-03 01:41:45 +0000 UTC]
If you want to use a creative commons license, where it says "Allow modifications of your work?" just bubble one of the two options that says yes. This means that people are allowed to make modified or derivative works (in other words, they make a new image that partially incorporates your image, which is what deviantART stock is typically used for). Hopefully that makes sense, if not I'm sure you can find out more from the help desk.
π: 0 β©: 1
manaphoto-stock In reply to thelonesoldier [2007-04-05 08:17:13 +0000 UTC]
I'm a bit confused, I thought that was the whole point of the creative commons license. Anyway, I made the adjustment by checking the bubble that allows modifications, but i'm not sure if I notice any difference..haha. Thanks for the help and for using the photo.
π: 0 β©: 1
thelonesoldier In reply to manaphoto-stock [2007-04-05 21:18:22 +0000 UTC]
Well, a traditional copyright technically implies that the work cannot be redistributed (for example, posted on the internet at other websites) without permission of the creator. A creative commons no-derivative license means that others can redistribute your work (post it at other sites or whatever) without needing to ask, but they must credit you and specify that it is a creative commons work.
π: 0 β©: 1