HOME | DD

Mao-Forevah β€” Mao Poster

Published: 2009-04-10 09:29:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 7429; Favourites: 51; Downloads: 3813
Redirect to original
Description The Great Thought of Mao Zedong Shines With Splendor!
Related content
Comments: 41

MartinKassemJ120 [2019-04-06 04:16:15 +0000 UTC]

Great Leader

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Marius1867 [2016-11-18 22:32:45 +0000 UTC]

Long Live Chairman Mao Zedong

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Da-Commander [2016-03-17 11:56:47 +0000 UTC]

If it weren't for him, China would still be a 3rd world country by now and a complete clusterfuck.

Anyone comparing him to the likes of Hitler makes me want to punch puppies.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tikiyachod In reply to Da-Commander [2018-01-05 08:16:59 +0000 UTC]

Come punch me then.

Liberals, Conservatives, Maoists, Nazis and Green Maggots, they all drag me in a hysteria and make me want to crush 'em all and build my wonderful Kaiserreich!

Centrism and Monarchism above all!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Da-Commander In reply to Tikiyachod [2018-02-23 07:35:45 +0000 UTC]

Because the Chinese dynasties and a completely fractured country in constant war with itself would've been clearly better. Not.
Yes, the man was ruthless, yes many died, but you don't make the mother of all omelettes without cracking eggs.

If it weren't for him, China wouldn't be the global superpower it is now. Period.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tikiyachod In reply to Da-Commander [2018-02-23 07:42:33 +0000 UTC]

Then all credits go to Deng Xiaoping, he actually did do something very very useful to the economy of Mainland China. While all Mao did was pointless stupid activities and inner fightings that broke the economy and society of China. He even refused Japanese war reparations too.

If you really want a republican system, go with the Kuomintang and let China be divided like Korea OTL. Just look at the Republic of China on Taiwan, it prospers to this day, and even after having their rightful China seat being taken away in 1971, they still have a prospering and influential Taiwan.

The Kuomintang couldn't develop China well because of all the warlords and of course the cunning Commies that made a lot of troubles. But look at the growth rate during the Peiyang and Kuomintang period, still a lot higher than Mao's reign. Well soon after ww2, there was a peace offer but Mao refused and insisted to wage a civil war on the war torn lands of China when they just endured Japanese occupation.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Da-Commander In reply to Tikiyachod [2018-02-23 16:22:44 +0000 UTC]

Right, because a divided korea is exactly what we would still want today.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tikiyachod In reply to Da-Commander [2018-02-23 16:25:26 +0000 UTC]

At least South Korea has become a prosperous and free enough country in the end.

I mean, sure South Korea has its own faults, but compare it to North Korea and you'll see the difference. I would rather see China divided into two halves, rather than having 95% of China suffering massacres and crazed revolutionary activities which did nothing good but fuck up the country, to today's huge social problems, corruptions and pollutions...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Da-Commander In reply to Tikiyachod [2018-02-23 16:39:19 +0000 UTC]

Sure, because China is the only country with corruption and pollution problems.

Also, north korea got the shit end of the stick when the soviet union collapsed. If the U.S could have minded its own business, it probably would be fairing much better.
Today we're bashing them down constantly for possessions of nuclear arsenal, which is completely hypocritical. We sanction them to oblivion, then point at how terrible life is out there compared to south korea... which would collapse the second we would decide embargo them as well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tikiyachod In reply to Da-Commander [2018-02-23 16:41:58 +0000 UTC]

Well of course many other countries have such problems too, but within Communist Party systems, they are much worse compared to other countries. There, the elite cronies within the Communist Party could get away with massive corruptions, because they also happen to own the judicial system too.

Well, North Korea threatened to nuke people, and well North Korea sucks about basic human rights so that's reasonable and okay for me

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Da-Commander In reply to Tikiyachod [2018-02-25 05:42:27 +0000 UTC]

You speak as if communism is the only kind of system that can breed corruption, America is anything BUT communist, yet look at how much lobbyism there is, cronies as you say and what have you. Corruption is not a concept mutually exclusive to communism.

Any country in North Korea's position would have resolved to threats. Threats which would not have been necessary if we would've left them alone in the first place.
Basic human rights are down in the shitter because they can't afford them any longer.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Alpha-Squid [2015-08-29 04:01:55 +0000 UTC]

While I despise Mao Tse-tung I must the man had a great smile.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

The-Polybius [2015-04-15 22:27:58 +0000 UTC]

Bloody dictator

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tikiyachod In reply to The-Polybius [2018-01-05 08:17:27 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I know right?

Fuck Mao

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PencilsAndDarkness [2015-03-13 21:27:02 +0000 UTC]

I feel so at home x'D

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Asukaism [2013-12-02 14:14:37 +0000 UTC]

fuck communism

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tikiyachod In reply to Asukaism [2018-01-05 08:17:17 +0000 UTC]

I agree

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

OhioErieCanalGirl [2013-04-09 07:04:11 +0000 UTC]

This is cool!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tmkst15 [2012-11-15 15:07:11 +0000 UTC]

你可δ»₯εœ¨ζŸδΊ›ζ—Άε€™ζ¬Ίιͺ—ζ‰€ζœ‰δΊΊ,也可δ»₯εœ¨ζ‰€ζœ‰ζ—Άε€™ζ¬Ίιͺ—ζŸδΊ›δΊΊ,δ½†ζ˜―δ½ ζ— ζ³•εœ¨ζ‰€ζœ‰ζ—Άε€™ζ¬Ίιͺ—ζ‰€ζœ‰δΊΊγ€‚
Yes, not even in China

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

CCPandcivilians In reply to tmkst15 [2021-09-10 12:31:33 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tikiyachod In reply to tmkst15 [2018-01-05 08:17:52 +0000 UTC]

Well said.

Sooner or later, all the truths will be revealed in time.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

norwegian-noob In reply to tmkst15 [2015-04-23 17:28:56 +0000 UTC]

bra sagt men du burde kanse ha hatt en eneglsk oversettelse

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SittingLyra [2012-02-03 16:33:46 +0000 UTC]

I used to like Mao when I was nine and ten years old because I always associated his name with cats. But tyhen I found out what a murderous tryant and traitor to socialism he was and now I hate him. He was basically Stalin 2: Electric Boogaloo

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

CCPandcivilians In reply to SittingLyra [2021-09-10 12:32:36 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

cassiebruce In reply to SittingLyra [2018-04-06 10:06:58 +0000 UTC]

Sorry to bother you,but where did you hear that?I am a Chinese but I have never known what you replied here

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JVarriano [2010-01-25 04:04:10 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

marketgarden In reply to JVarriano [2010-03-18 01:44:02 +0000 UTC]

is a petulant child.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JVarriano In reply to marketgarden [2010-03-18 05:04:59 +0000 UTC]

I'm not, but how would you know that?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mao-Forevah In reply to JVarriano [2010-01-31 11:47:03 +0000 UTC]

Could you please take your toys somewhere else?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JVarriano In reply to Mao-Forevah [2010-02-01 18:10:40 +0000 UTC]

No thanks! If you didn't want comments, you should have disabled comments.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mao-Forevah In reply to JVarriano [2010-02-20 17:37:03 +0000 UTC]

It is obviously that, everyone wants to receive intelligent comments neither dumb.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JVarriano In reply to Mao-Forevah [2010-02-22 17:13:10 +0000 UTC]

I gave it what it was worth.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mao-Forevah In reply to JVarriano [2010-03-04 12:38:00 +0000 UTC]

I see, I think this one will show your worth ->

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JVarriano In reply to Mao-Forevah [2010-03-05 02:14:05 +0000 UTC]

Well, coming from a Mao supporter.. I think I'll just laugh and be on my way. I suggest you do the same!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mao-Forevah In reply to JVarriano [2010-03-05 18:16:13 +0000 UTC]

I think it's about time for you to do that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

norwegian-noob In reply to Mao-Forevah [2015-04-23 17:19:50 +0000 UTC]

its a grait poster but it is cind of hard to ferget the millions that died because of Chinas un funcional goverment in the mao period. so dont take the anti mao coments personal.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CardinalOfPain [2009-07-24 18:15:54 +0000 UTC]

Honourable Chairman , could you translate the symbols in red ?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mao-Forevah In reply to CardinalOfPain [2009-07-26 13:19:36 +0000 UTC]

You think that is very simple? Mao has got his own limits!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kaikid009 [2009-04-16 15:44:12 +0000 UTC]

lol my teacher has the mao rist watch

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CardinalOfPain [2009-04-10 10:21:53 +0000 UTC]

Sure it does and it will never seace to do so .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mao-Forevah In reply to CardinalOfPain [2009-04-10 10:55:28 +0000 UTC]

Thank you comrade! I am happy you think that way!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0