HOME | DD

Mapper — USS KENNEDY

Published: 2012-12-28 16:52:44 +0000 UTC; Views: 1763; Favourites: 33; Downloads: 70
Redirect to original
Description I consider the Archer Class ship to be the PT boat of Star Fleet. And thus decided to name this particular ship the Kennedy. Reg # 2109.
The Skipper of this Vessel lives up to the ships namesake, in that he customizes her.
Like the PT 109 had a howetzer added, he added a few Phase Pulse cannons amoung other non approved Federation upgrades.

The nose art is a mosquito with a hand phaser.

Credit
Archer class scout mesh created by Mark Azevedo - www.3dmaz.com. Ship design by Masao Okazaki. OBJ conversion and enhancement by Ptrope w/ texture support by Arcass

Lots of Trek goodies here [link]
Related content
Comments: 18

LoneBrowncoat [2016-04-28 17:25:39 +0000 UTC]

PT73

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mapper In reply to LoneBrowncoat [2016-04-29 06:51:43 +0000 UTC]

They need a Commander McHale

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LoneBrowncoat In reply to Mapper [2016-05-16 02:56:05 +0000 UTC]

YEP!

What to do for a ncc number?
Maybe NCC-PL73?....You can't place it too high or too low, to avoid conflict with others that may be in the 10xx-
21xx range.  PL meaning Patrol-Local {or Patrol-Light}, which is what her namesake[s] did in WWII, since neither
could carry many torpedoes, say six maximum? IIUC, the 'T' in the original wet navy boats stood for torpedo.
{really dunno}

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mapper In reply to LoneBrowncoat [2016-05-16 15:21:02 +0000 UTC]

well it might be ok with something like1173 with a commander named McHale or Parker. Someone would make the connection. There are sooo many ships that are fan created that some numbers will conflict.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LoneBrowncoat In reply to Mapper [2016-05-18 05:40:51 +0000 UTC]

 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Maddog3060 [2013-02-27 05:04:14 +0000 UTC]

That looks very tiny.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mapper In reply to Maddog3060 [2013-02-27 14:12:02 +0000 UTC]

she is, according to the creators specs she carries a crew of only 14

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Maddog3060 In reply to Mapper [2013-02-27 15:49:17 +0000 UTC]

They must have to bunk like old WWII submarines then, because if that hatch on the side is any indication it's about the size of a Runabout.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mapper In reply to Maddog3060 [2013-02-28 04:09:54 +0000 UTC]

heres a scale scene. [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Maddog3060 In reply to Mapper [2013-02-28 07:07:04 +0000 UTC]

Saw that, didn't know it was the same ship.

Teeny tiny thing, and it suffers from the same problem a lot of Sic-Fi ships do: Where the frack is all the fuel/propellant?! O_o

Ah well, it's Star Trek so you get a pass. THIS time. But the Lords High Terra shall be watching.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bro-Harl [2013-01-06 15:34:48 +0000 UTC]

Reminds me of the USS BonHomme Richard The Frigater from my Star Trek RPG...It was decommissioned and used for training Engineering cadets,so when we got her,she had most of the weapon systems of a heavy cruiser haphazardly installed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mapper In reply to Bro-Harl [2013-01-07 04:04:35 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bro-Harl In reply to Mapper [2013-01-07 13:08:10 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lord-Crios [2012-12-29 07:57:51 +0000 UTC]

Really cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mapper In reply to Lord-Crios [2012-12-29 14:14:17 +0000 UTC]

thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lord-Crios In reply to Mapper [2013-01-02 07:59:29 +0000 UTC]

YW

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EarlMcClaw [2012-12-28 18:43:04 +0000 UTC]

And she got nicknamed "Spirit of the 109." (I once imagined a ship called the "Scorpion" -- it had an experimental "spinal mount" weapon.)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mapper In reply to EarlMcClaw [2012-12-29 04:04:30 +0000 UTC]

Figured I go all the way with name and number

👍: 0 ⏩: 0