HOME | DD

MazeNL77 In reply to gfxman [2008-10-18 17:00:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks a lot, I really appreciate your comments. C:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MazeNL77 In reply to gfxman [2008-08-24 08:00:07 +0000 UTC]

Whoops, sorry all Denmarkish people.
Icon sets were removed due to copyright stuff, I gave everyone permission to use my icons everywhere but didn't think about the fact that not everyone knows some icons have copyrighted logo's in them, such as the Microsoft Windows logo. *sob*
Icons sets can probably still be found on other icon sites.
I have 20 icons for NX11 done so far. But it's going slowly... It feels more as a job than as a simple hobby. D:

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gfxman In reply to MazeNL77 [2008-08-25 23:16:22 +0000 UTC]

Thats sad dude. I got around 21 gig of top icon sets-dating back to when copaland & Dot Icons was the 2 top sites. And i got the sets i liked of yours (from 4 and up).
If NX11 feels like a job then put it away for a while, and wait for the "mojo" to come back
Later MazeNL from GFXman

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MazeNL77 In reply to gfxman [2008-08-26 07:19:28 +0000 UTC]

*gasp* 21 gigs. :0
I did put the icon making away for a while, but now that the icons are getting better and more detailed I really have to pay close attention to not messing them up. This makes me want to rush iconmaking because I know I'm gonna be tired of it in a few days again. Even the relatively simple folder icon was a pain to make. D:
Oh well, I think I thought the same thing when making NX10 so new icons are probably (read: hopefully (read: maybe)) coming before the end of the year.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MazeNL77 In reply to ssx [2008-03-30 09:29:56 +0000 UTC]

It is done... I think I'll just make 2 versions of this globe in my next icon set, one with the sand and seethrough water, and one without all that.
Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MazeNL77 In reply to ncus [2008-03-13 08:43:30 +0000 UTC]

Oops... By highlight, do you mean the large glossy effect, or the tiny shiny effect?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MazeNL77 In reply to ncus [2008-03-13 08:22:30 +0000 UTC]

The highlight at the bottom is supposed to look like the water of the globe is reflective, and it's reflecting the floor it's standing on. But you're right, maybe I should also place a highlight at the top of the globe (right below the ice layer), and / or make the bottom highlight less bright. I'll experiment a bit with it to see what looks better and realistic.
I don't really see what you mean with the shadows on the surface, do you mean the tiny dark green dots? Or the dark blue stuff on the water? Because the dark blue stuff is the other side of the globe, it's a bit see-through.
Thanks a lot for the advice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ncus In reply to MazeNL77 [2008-03-13 09:31:09 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MazeNL77 In reply to Benjigarner [2008-03-11 20:30:23 +0000 UTC]

I tried that, but I can't seem to get it to look good.
But thanks for the suggestion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Benjigarner In reply to MazeNL77 [2008-03-12 12:31:34 +0000 UTC]

OK
Good job still

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MazeNL77 In reply to banabeal [2008-03-11 16:17:49 +0000 UTC]

It's supposed to be sand and mountains
(Probably not very accurate though)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0