HOME | DD

mcnuggyy — twimac forever

Published: 2011-12-11 23:53:55 +0000 UTC; Views: 4366; Favourites: 101; Downloads: 183
Redirect to original
Description i kept it simple... so my computer wouldnt eat me... twimac yesssss... mabye if my sister begs me ill do some fluttermac...
Related content
Comments: 73

mcnuggyy In reply to ??? [2012-02-12 07:13:19 +0000 UTC]

huurrrhuurrr

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

zchick121 [2012-01-16 02:53:39 +0000 UTC]

YAY!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tanuki-kage [2011-12-29 05:10:49 +0000 UTC]

I don't get why fluttermac is so popular, I like twimac more. xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

writemaster93 In reply to tanuki-kage [2011-12-31 16:38:57 +0000 UTC]

Probably because Mac's the strong, silent guy and Fluttershy's the weak defenseless damsel. The whole thing reeks of stereotypes. There's nothing wrong if the strong guy has a lady who's smart and can take care of herself!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tanuki-kage In reply to writemaster93 [2011-12-31 21:56:09 +0000 UTC]

I was told that it was for a different reason; that there was fanon speculation that Big Mac was both shy and a gentleman and thus would be a good boyfriend for Fluttershy. Although I don't think this is the case at all, he doesn't seem nervous around other people (if anything, overly relaxed), and every good male pony could fit in the latter. >_o

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

writemaster93 In reply to tanuki-kage [2011-12-31 22:26:46 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I don't think Mac's shy. He just hasn't talked to anypony aside from Applejack and Twilight because he's a secondary character. And yes, any good male pony could be a gentleman for Fluttershy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tanuki-kage In reply to writemaster93 [2011-12-31 23:48:19 +0000 UTC]


I mean, people can ship what they want and for whatever reasons they want, but it seems fluttermac fans seem to believe that it's somehow more canon and it's acceptable to spam pics that have either character shipped with someone else, and that's when it gets upsetting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

writemaster93 In reply to tanuki-kage [2012-01-01 00:36:16 +0000 UTC]

Yeah. One person on a Twimac pic was like "Nooooo, Mac loves Fluttershy!" and I'm like, "Since when?"

Another thing, it seems like Applejack and Twilight seem to be the only ones of the mane six who know Mac exists. Applejack had mentioned him to Twilight twice in Season 1 (Ticket Master and Applebuck Season) and they were the only ones to talk to him (AJ, Applebuck Season and Winter Wrap Up; Twilight, Lesson Zero)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tanuki-kage In reply to writemaster93 [2012-01-01 02:07:26 +0000 UTC]

I swear I'm going to snap next time I see another comment like that, I've seen plenty of those x-x

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mcnuggyy In reply to tanuki-kage [2011-12-29 05:11:48 +0000 UTC]

same here.. dagnabit fluttershy and macintosh have never even talked to each other before T_T

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

writemaster93 In reply to mcnuggyy [2012-01-01 02:34:07 +0000 UTC]

Yeah. The only ones who have are Twilight and AJ.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to writemaster93 [2012-01-01 02:54:09 +0000 UTC]

eeeyup

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tanuki-kage In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-29 05:44:01 +0000 UTC]

I agree, plus there was the licking in s2e2, and him running away with Smartypants, and you know, actually talking to each other. Plus judging by Applebuck season and the fact that he was originally going to be the character who owned the farm, I figure he's also really smart like Twi, making them have something in common.
It isn't MUCH, but TwiMac still has a lot more going for it in canon than FlutterMac.

That, and there are a lot of really obnoxious fluttermac fans. I rarely see a TwiMac pic that doesn't have some sort of "OMG MAC IS CHEATING ON FLUTTERSHY!11 ohnoes" comment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to tanuki-kage [2011-12-29 05:46:48 +0000 UTC]

haahha XD yeah i get what you mean.. i know an annoying fluttermac fan.. my sister XD... she always getting mad at me for drawing twimac.. but i dont care anymore

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tanuki-kage In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-29 06:00:19 +0000 UTC]

Seriously, I mean I could understand if it was an actual canon or implied pairing, but it's a crack pairing, more so than TwiMac, so there's no use getting that involved with a crack pairing that isn't going to happen. >.<

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to tanuki-kage [2011-12-29 06:31:43 +0000 UTC]

Yup true true... besides fluttermac is just to easy.. it needs more background and tention.. or something..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tanuki-kage In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-29 06:37:10 +0000 UTC]

idk how twimac has much more of that than fluttermac, but ok? xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to tanuki-kage [2011-12-29 21:45:46 +0000 UTC]

i dont know that sounded better in my head

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tanuki-kage In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-29 23:15:17 +0000 UTC]

I think I get what you mean, and I agree. xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to tanuki-kage [2011-12-29 23:30:38 +0000 UTC]

hahah XD im glad

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PainterlyMarks [2011-12-29 03:37:03 +0000 UTC]

TwiMac = Best Pony Pairing

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to PainterlyMarks [2011-12-29 03:37:50 +0000 UTC]

eyyup

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PainterlyMarks In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-29 03:50:13 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to PainterlyMarks [2011-12-29 04:52:41 +0000 UTC]

huurrhurr

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PainterlyMarks In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-29 20:56:42 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to PainterlyMarks [2011-12-29 21:43:22 +0000 UTC]

hahah XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PainterlyMarks In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-30 20:43:45 +0000 UTC]

xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to PainterlyMarks [2011-12-31 00:05:01 +0000 UTC]

Heheh

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SwettieCzika [2011-12-27 09:23:17 +0000 UTC]

I love this couple

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to SwettieCzika [2011-12-27 19:56:43 +0000 UTC]

me too 83

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SwettieCzika In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-28 14:35:26 +0000 UTC]

Sooo cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to SwettieCzika [2011-12-28 17:57:18 +0000 UTC]

eyyup

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SwettieCzika In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-28 19:11:24 +0000 UTC]

XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to SwettieCzika [2011-12-29 02:48:37 +0000 UTC]

hurrr

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SwettieCzika In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-29 10:30:23 +0000 UTC]

durr

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to SwettieCzika [2011-12-29 21:51:47 +0000 UTC]

huurr

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SwettieCzika In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-29 22:45:39 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to SwettieCzika [2011-12-29 22:54:39 +0000 UTC]

heehee

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

SwettieCzika In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-29 23:18:16 +0000 UTC]

Wuuuuttt

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to SwettieCzika [2011-12-29 23:30:53 +0000 UTC]

8I

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SwettieCzika In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-30 12:29:53 +0000 UTC]

aaa ok <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SwettieCzika In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-29 23:08:27 +0000 UTC]

Cx

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to SwettieCzika [2011-12-29 23:09:22 +0000 UTC]

C8

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SwettieCzika In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-30 12:31:18 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to SwettieCzika [2011-12-30 19:36:14 +0000 UTC]

heheh XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SwettieCzika In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-30 19:37:33 +0000 UTC]

<3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to SwettieCzika [2011-12-30 19:40:58 +0000 UTC]

hehe

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SwettieCzika In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-30 20:00:23 +0000 UTC]

M3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mcnuggyy In reply to SwettieCzika [2011-12-30 20:03:17 +0000 UTC]

8O

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SwettieCzika In reply to mcnuggyy [2011-12-30 20:11:34 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>