HOME | DD

MDC-Photography — Horse Hooves

Published: 2009-12-28 02:36:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 835; Favourites: 18; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Practice
Related content
Comments: 9

Tomatogrower [2010-01-04 03:17:01 +0000 UTC]

You Have Been Featured Here: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MDC-Photography In reply to Tomatogrower [2010-01-04 03:21:11 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Appreciate it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wzrdofozfan [2010-01-01 15:09:02 +0000 UTC]

You've been featured here .
Happy New Year!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MDC-Photography In reply to wzrdofozfan [2010-01-01 19:00:25 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much and happy new year to you too

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BassOvercast [2009-12-29 07:35:51 +0000 UTC]

This one, is closer to being minimalistic than "Lost Love" but still has to much split focus. The second "foot" (hoof? lol) further in the background creates a dual focus making one look back and forth between the two. It also creates a strange and even queer, negative shape that creates quite an interesting image. What would have worked really well with this image is if you'd been able either capture the foot in the foreground while the horse had raised the background foot/hoof(?) or if you could find a way to edit out the background one.
BUT! There's another way this could have been managed REALLY well. And I must admit, I do it quite often. You can crop the image so that the part of the image with the rear foot is no longer in the image. This will clear up qualms with the negative space. It also means far less tricky business on your behalf in regards to working with the animal to suit your needs, or editing to create something that wasn't there in the first place. And furthermore it would work really well with this image as the edge of the foreground foot would enter at roughly the middle of the photograph creating a really nice ballanced feel, object on the left, texture (texture being the grass) on the right.
Remember:
Not every good photo needs to be everything that was captured by the camera.
When you see something you want to take a photo of... and it inspired an incredible emotive aspect and you want to capture it on camera, do you really need all the surrounding features? Or would you prefer to just contain what it was you wanted to work with?
Of course, I understand in this case you may have wanted both hooves. Which in that case, this then works for you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MDC-Photography In reply to BassOvercast [2009-12-29 14:45:48 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I was pretty sure these two wouldn't work but I figured I could try anyway. I'll see what I can do with this one. I might actually have a picture of just one hoof somewhere.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BassOvercast In reply to MDC-Photography [2010-01-06 23:38:59 +0000 UTC]


Good job.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xJasmine [2009-12-28 03:58:23 +0000 UTC]

Wow, it's magical. ;O I would write a critique if I had a premium membership, but I even if I did there probably isn't much I could write here. I am usually a picky person when it comes to photos, but this one just has no faults as far as I'm concerned.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MDC-Photography In reply to xJasmine [2009-12-28 04:00:39 +0000 UTC]

Thanks and thanks for the fav

👍: 0 ⏩: 0