Comments: 75
Tyrsyth [2007-09-07 10:05:33 +0000 UTC]
Salutations! I've actually had my eye on one of the images in this pack for some time now, and finally found something to use it for. Thank you so much for providing such awesome images which made this possible Forgotten Ways
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
debequpe [2007-03-17 20:06:31 +0000 UTC]
I used it here... [link] thanks so much for the stock! ^^
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Mel2DaIssa In reply to constantuncertanty [2007-01-11 14:30:06 +0000 UTC]
ok ok... so from experience if you go to ireland all photos come out looking like postcards no matter what kinda camera you use, is that to say i didn't take them... um no...
SOOO obviously this person is jealous... very very jealous and probably carving your name into his goth arm to pass time... or as said above "vomiting purple bunnies" from the eyes, SO all of a sudden it is a bad thing to do GREAT work for artists that need GREAT stock photos... so you better do some crappy ones... so we can make crappy artwork like this fellow... or else!!! *shakes finger*
psh... keep it up!!! your photos are great! we intelligent da members back you up 100%! don't let jealous fools get you down. keep up your passion cuz we stock hungry artists, like myself, need you!!!
thanks for your photos!!!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
NessaPalmer In reply to constantuncertanty [2007-01-09 23:53:47 +0000 UTC]
WTF! Okay, I have looked at her stuff I have used them, and I have watch her for awhile now. I can tell if something was from a book or if it was actually taken. There would be something left from the scanning duh! (obviously you didn't know that) None of her pictures should any signs of being scanned. Which means she took them! Seriously either your that jealous or have no time on your hands. *shakes head shamefully*
I can't believe people like you exist, but sadly you have to. But still to wrong accuse someone of such is really low.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
flordelys In reply to constantuncertanty [2007-01-09 21:16:53 +0000 UTC]
you must be a lonely, miserable person, but I guess you deserve it.
Enjoy your 15 minutes of DA fame then go back to the shadows, you're so unimportant
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
constantuncertanty In reply to flordelys [2007-01-09 21:43:58 +0000 UTC]
I've emailed several online stock communities and sent them this link. We'll see if she owns this stock or not. And I am not on DA I've requested that my account be closed.
I mean, look at her images. How could she have made all of them? And someone replied that there were all those camera data like lenses and such and I say that is data available at places like gettisimages and other online stock image places.
It doesn't matter if she has been online since 2004 or that you like her or that you used her stock and don't want to believe that it wasn't hers.
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
Eileithyia In reply to constantuncertanty [2007-01-10 21:49:31 +0000 UTC]
I was with her several times while she took a lot of the photos she submits as stock. I believe in what my eyes see and I did see her taking these photos! If they have an outstanding quality, you should praise her instead of finding reasons to discredit her work. You should be ashamed of yourself for raising such an accusation without any proof.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
flordelys In reply to constantuncertanty [2007-01-09 22:18:15 +0000 UTC]
She IS a professional photographer. Why would you question her work?
I find it ridiculous. I have hundreds of shots that I have taken in my journeys. If I happened to shoot the Acropolis from the same angle as the next person who posts it on younameitstock.com, does it mean that the shot is not mine?
You cannot go around making wild accusations like this on a professional, public site.
It's so not cool.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Taboon1 In reply to constantuncertanty [2007-01-09 18:06:21 +0000 UTC]
for gawdssake...
if you wanna find people using others' photos, art... surely you could go find the numerous, and frankly obvious, dumbasses at DA, and other places.
What a lame attempt.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Renilicious In reply to constantuncertanty [2007-01-09 07:33:36 +0000 UTC]
What a sad, unpleasant little snot you are. Suddenly it's a crime for a person to post consistently good quality photographs? WHAT THE HELL DO PEOPLE LIKE YOU WANT? Quality or crap? You complain when you get noisy, unfocused images, yet someone posts GOOD stock suddenly it can't be their own work. Grow up.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Gracies-Stock In reply to constantuncertanty [2007-01-09 06:08:00 +0000 UTC]
Hmmm this is not right. You dare you publicly shame someone for something they have not done. How dare you!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Taurina In reply to constantuncertanty [2007-01-09 01:25:32 +0000 UTC]
Hey man, post a link or something to prove it before writing something as lame as this.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Synchrestra In reply to constantuncertanty [2007-01-09 00:50:36 +0000 UTC]
I know =Mehrunnisa-stock for many time now. I can assure you that she didn't stole anything anywhere and it is all her work. If you don't believe it, it is your right to do so. But don't be rude and state things you can't even prove! Don't accuse people of theft when you don't have a single proof of it. And specially based in someone else actions. We are not all equal. Fortunately.
For someone that write that you don't wanna be cruel and mean no offense, you really did a good job doing the opposite. Think twice before you write such words again to someone.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Elandria In reply to constantuncertanty [2007-01-08 23:26:43 +0000 UTC]
As a stock provider and a good friend of Mehrunnisa's I can assure you that her photographs are not stolen from architecture books. Quite frankly there is no physical way of rescanning images from a book to such a consistantly high standard so I really don't get what your point is. Saying that you do not want to sound cruel or cause offense is hypocritical when you accuse her of stealing in a public space without privately asking her to verify the authenticity of her photographs - not that they need to be authenticated. With all due respect if you had actually taken note of the details DA takes from the photograph IE date, make and model of the camera you would have seen instantly that these are all original photographs and NOT scanned. This information is embedded into the EXIF data of each individual photograph as it it taken by the digital camera - and can not be changed etc.
On the other hand I'm sure once Nia gets over the heartbreaking and cruel accusation that you lay on her door I'm sure she will be pleased to note that you thought her photographs were "a bit professional" and good enough to be used for your artwork.
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
Neo00 In reply to constantuncertanty [2007-01-10 23:38:44 +0000 UTC]
"I won't say anything again." The only sentence worth mentioning in your comment...
keep your word and you will make the world a better place
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
constantuncertanty In reply to Neo00 [2007-01-11 00:13:08 +0000 UTC]
The only thing that would make the world a better place if all humans would die. The human race is a cancer.
I despise you.
All this attention is not shaming me it is only making me angry and more hateful.
I suppose that is why I don't care that I hurt this persons feelings or not.
๐: 0 โฉ: 3
Neo00 In reply to constantuncertanty [2007-01-11 18:01:26 +0000 UTC]
You are right ... so do the right thing, be the first to change the world and erradicate yourself from earth and make it healthier.
All that hate is bad for your health....you should go to a psychologist... like =Mehrunnisa-stock xDxD
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
cjade In reply to constantuncertanty [2007-01-11 02:32:15 +0000 UTC]
So that justifies you making accusations, despite the fact you don't have any evidence to back up your claims?
It's no ones fault but your own that you made yourself look like a fool.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Elandria In reply to constantuncertanty [2007-01-09 02:24:00 +0000 UTC]
Still no reason to judge anybody else by the same qualities for lies this other person had :/ The way DA is set up with the availability of the EXIF data makes it impossible for people to lie about whether the photographs are original or not. I guess you live and learn.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
| Next =>