HOME | DD

MF99K β€” COM: You Can't Be Seen Here...

Published: 2014-08-05 06:05:56 +0000 UTC; Views: 12808; Favourites: 370; Downloads: 39
Redirect to original
Description commission request for

I didn't really believe in that Stanley theory until I drew this for some reason. Seems legit I guess.

Extremely obvious Bill is obvious
Related content
Comments: 95

TaxablePuma54 [2016-09-30 23:14:07 +0000 UTC]

Stanley: Listen you can't be seen here Ford.

Ford: Why?

Stanley: It's just best to have no reason.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

dragoeniex [2016-09-09 20:23:41 +0000 UTC]

O_o Spoilers below for anyone who hasn't finished this series, but...




Yikes, I can't fathom how so many people figured this out ahead of time. I was watching these after the series finished airing, without hiatuses to Pine for the show and speculate, but still. It's really impressive going through fan art and seeing works like this. Super fun, too. Haha, Bill peeping through and the fact that Ford has his hands behind his back here make this picture incredible in hindsight!

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

EstherKirkland [2016-02-24 22:53:29 +0000 UTC]

After the Legend of the Gnome Gemulets game and the comment about Shermy being such a square and always wearing a bow tie -- let's pretend this is Stan and Shermy and Shermy knew about the Stan-is-Ford-is-Stan muddle.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Araceku [2015-06-17 22:11:22 +0000 UTC]

Except now we know that Stanley's twin is WAY cooler that than!!!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Candcbreezy [2015-04-23 20:39:33 +0000 UTC]

legit... legit indeed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ravenquynh [2015-03-28 03:34:22 +0000 UTC]

Well, now the theory COME TRUE.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Gravities-Falling618 [2015-03-04 02:13:17 +0000 UTC]

//Listening to Take Me To Church by Hozier as I stare at this//
//Holy crap I have a fanfic idea//

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MF99K In reply to Gravities-Falling618 [2015-03-04 02:20:04 +0000 UTC]

XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gravities-Falling618 In reply to MF99K [2015-03-04 02:22:13 +0000 UTC]

//Now I need to write it//

//Idea: There's a cult dedicated to Bill, And Stanley was in it. After years, They let him out in favor of Dipper.

//Sounds weird.

//But than again.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

LoveAnimals8 [2015-01-15 17:58:24 +0000 UTC]

OMG, Bill! I got really surprised when I noticed him!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

keiko4568 [2015-01-10 03:36:03 +0000 UTC]

OMG

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

lightyearpig [2014-11-12 01:00:42 +0000 UTC]

Bill: Seen is right. (lightly snickers as he disappears into the forest) Hey bees, allow me to steal your hive!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sup-Gurl [2014-10-08 00:28:59 +0000 UTC]

aLwAyS wAtChInG.....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

peblezQ [2014-09-19 21:20:16 +0000 UTC]

Awesome drawing! It looks legit! I don't know what to think about this theory. I mean, Stan has to have a sibling because he's Dipper and Mabel's greatuncle, and maybe they never knew their grandfather or grandmother that's related to Stan? And also, twins seem to run in the family. But I guess we'll never really know until it's revealed that he has a sibling and who they are and why they're so 'secret'.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MF99K In reply to peblezQ [2014-09-20 02:29:14 +0000 UTC]

yea

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Bound-To-The-Ground [2014-09-17 20:30:50 +0000 UTC]

theory is fake, art is real

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

MF99K In reply to Bound-To-The-Ground [2015-03-10 01:47:55 +0000 UTC]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Β HA
THATS FUNNYΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MF99K In reply to Bound-To-The-Ground [2014-09-17 23:18:59 +0000 UTC]

Theories can't be fake by definition, but it may not be true. I don't really have an opinion either way

sry

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Bound-To-The-Ground In reply to MF99K [2014-09-20 02:44:11 +0000 UTC]

i just don't believe in the theories about stanly, and is stans real name stanford? than i don't know it seems far fetched to me

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MF99K In reply to Bound-To-The-Ground [2014-09-20 02:49:26 +0000 UTC]

Yeah his real name's Stanford. Honestly I've heard MUCH more farfetched theories than that but I don't really care either way

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ausoro [2014-09-11 11:34:37 +0000 UTC]

I do believe in the Stanley theory because I have seen proof of his existance in the episodes.
However, I'm wondering this: Was Stanley's name confirmed by Alex Hirsch? I'm wondering just because if it's not I have the right to tell people his name shouldn't and couldn't be Stanley...
I mean seriously what lunitics would name their sons Stanford and Stanley?!

This is an amazing piece. Favorited ~

Bill you sly devil ~

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PTAlex In reply to Ausoro [2015-01-03 02:57:25 +0000 UTC]

Stanford's car Said "STNLYMBL" which obviously stands for Stanley Mobile!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ausoro In reply to PTAlex [2015-01-03 05:58:53 +0000 UTC]

Which, in my opinion, proves nothing. Stanford could've easily changed his name to 'Stanford'. He could've been Stanley.
Β I simply don't quite fathom the fact that two people would be so lazy as to name their children "Stanford" and "Stanley"

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AtomicSoviet [2014-08-27 07:54:08 +0000 UTC]

2 sp00ky 4 me

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

randompasserbyer [2014-08-23 19:29:26 +0000 UTC]

hE IS alWayS wAtchInG

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xXLegendary-FuryXx [2014-08-20 13:54:39 +0000 UTC]

Very CuteΒ suchΒ asΒ how many pointsΒ are you doing?(sorry to my englishXD)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MF99K In reply to xXLegendary-FuryXx [2014-08-20 17:56:13 +0000 UTC]

That's alright. I'm probably gonna change my prices based on demand and schedule but I'd probably say at the moment a piece like this would be 50 points. at times when I'm less busy it would be closer to 20 points but prices vary

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xXLegendary-FuryXx In reply to MF99K [2014-08-20 17:58:15 +0000 UTC]

And how much it would cost point opportunities to draw Dipper, Bill and my cat Heron??

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MF99K In reply to xXLegendary-FuryXx [2014-08-20 18:39:31 +0000 UTC]

with or without background?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xXLegendary-FuryXx In reply to MF99K [2014-08-20 19:15:35 +0000 UTC]

No background^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MF99K In reply to xXLegendary-FuryXx [2014-08-21 00:11:34 +0000 UTC]

and you said Cipher, Dipper and your cat, yes?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xXLegendary-FuryXx In reply to MF99K [2014-08-21 07:59:51 +0000 UTC]

Yes^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MF99K In reply to xXLegendary-FuryXx [2014-08-21 19:19:19 +0000 UTC]

and just vector for each?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xXLegendary-FuryXx In reply to MF99K [2014-08-21 19:22:41 +0000 UTC]

?there is this one pictureXD(sorry to my english)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MF99K In reply to xXLegendary-FuryXx [2014-08-21 20:11:58 +0000 UTC]

so you want them all together then?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xXLegendary-FuryXx In reply to MF99K [2014-08-21 20:41:38 +0000 UTC]

Yes please

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MF99K In reply to xXLegendary-FuryXx [2014-08-21 21:04:30 +0000 UTC]

and what pose/ what interaction?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xXLegendary-FuryXx In reply to MF99K [2014-08-21 21:11:55 +0000 UTC]

interaction friendly/except as to the photo that stood side by side and smiling^^something more or less

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MF99K In reply to xXLegendary-FuryXx [2014-08-22 05:47:07 +0000 UTC]

not quite sure what you mean by that, can you elaborate?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xXLegendary-FuryXx In reply to MF99K [2014-08-22 10:47:00 +0000 UTC]

The photo scene ,Can think of something,I don't mindXD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MF99K In reply to xXLegendary-FuryXx [2014-08-22 20:54:00 +0000 UTC]

would it be alright if I just vector them separately and then figure it out from there. three character vectors would probably come to a total of 20 at the moment

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xXLegendary-FuryXx In reply to MF99K [2014-08-22 20:58:12 +0000 UTC]

good, do it how you want ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MF99K In reply to xXLegendary-FuryXx [2014-08-23 01:04:46 +0000 UTC]

alright, can you send the points?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xXLegendary-FuryXx In reply to MF99K [2014-08-23 10:47:35 +0000 UTC]

How much?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MF99K In reply to xXLegendary-FuryXx [2014-08-23 18:54:13 +0000 UTC]

about 20 total

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xXLegendary-FuryXx In reply to MF99K [2014-08-23 19:32:09 +0000 UTC]

Ok^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

digimonlover321 [2014-08-08 20:48:19 +0000 UTC]

This is so awesome that i have no words for it!!!!
P.S Bill is watching you when you sleep!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Rebecca-47 [2014-08-07 21:48:57 +0000 UTC]

Did you notice that Stan's wearing different glasses in season 2?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

randompasserbyer In reply to Rebecca-47 [2014-08-23 19:28:45 +0000 UTC]

HE IS?!?! -rewatches any episode from S2- OMG HE IS!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rebecca-47 In reply to randompasserbyer [2014-08-24 00:43:57 +0000 UTC]

Suspicios...unless they were his this whole time and he just lost them in that room.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>