Comments: 68
Deborah-Valentine [2006-08-06 01:41:03 +0000 UTC]
I love this one! nice composition!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SalHunter [2006-07-07 18:54:19 +0000 UTC]
Love the gradient ... the subtle details and the whole flow ... fantastic flame!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Translucent-Image [2006-06-11 07:33:56 +0000 UTC]
Very smooth buddy !
I like what your doing in this
Your showing Good Power that can come from Apoph
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cmptrwhz [2006-06-11 02:24:35 +0000 UTC]
it looks so perfect. Well done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MichaelFaber In reply to cmptrwhz [2006-06-11 03:48:03 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the fav! i'm glad you like it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pictun [2006-06-10 22:28:35 +0000 UTC]
Looks like a painting! It's awesome!
Well, if you hop it, i guess i hate all of your work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Novastar2486 [2006-06-10 20:00:34 +0000 UTC]
Interesting piece. How do you create this kind of art? What program do you use?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MichaelFaber In reply to Novastar2486 [2006-06-11 03:54:36 +0000 UTC]
I use apophysis 2.04 beta. it is a free open source flame fractal program. you can get the latest version here [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Myemfar In reply to MichaelFaber [2006-06-11 09:35:00 +0000 UTC]
thanks for the advice, and yea, its hard to get away from stringy looking flames, but im working on it! it just seems that the amount of detail and flame that you get in your fractals is something i can never manage to get - is there some trick or setting that i havent discovered yet that changes the way all the fractals look?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MichaelFaber In reply to Myemfar [2006-06-11 20:21:39 +0000 UTC]
it is no setting, it is just knowing how to use the variations, and experience
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nemopaice [2006-06-10 15:33:48 +0000 UTC]
It 's a very nice one. good job. Maybe I'll try hating it tomorrow.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pajokar [2006-06-10 15:01:08 +0000 UTC]
Very cool flame and colors.
I think that you don't like the random design of the fine lines all over the flame. True?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MichaelFaber In reply to pajokar [2006-06-11 04:33:53 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Pakar! The 'doodle' part isn't super structured, like i usually do, but this was done on purpose. it gives it a soft textured look, which i thought went well. if you are interested, the 'doodle' part was created with one default (no translation, scaling, or skewing) transform with two variations. What i don't like is stringy whisps that look like the random generated flames.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KatamariMiracle [2006-06-10 14:15:23 +0000 UTC]
... You hope we hate it?... Wha?
I like it, so HA!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KatamariMiracle In reply to MichaelFaber [2006-06-11 15:22:36 +0000 UTC]
how could I not fav this?
A lot of this oddly reminds me of techno. X_x
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tdierikx [2006-06-10 08:24:38 +0000 UTC]
Wikkid!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MichaelFaber In reply to 2B2H [2006-06-11 04:47:44 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the fav Carl!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>