HOME | DD
mjranum — Box IX
[NSFW]
Published: 2009-10-12 04:01:33 +0000 UTC; Views: 19891; Favourites: 784; Downloads: 2240
Redirect to original
Description
Model is RCThis was lit with 2 large softboxes, stacked one on top of the other to form a light-beam about 10 feet tall.
Related content
Comments: 58
very nice pose and light!
used on photoshopcontest> [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
This is NOT a stock image and you are NOT welcome to just load my art into photoshop and alter it. Please delete any use you've made of my imagery and read this if you have further questions:
[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oh, sry i was so tired that night and havent noticed that i'v found it in your gallery and not in stock... i deleted it!
sorry again... cheers!
p.s you are a great artist!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Delightful lighting, intriguing pose, beautiful model, and just fantastic overall. Love it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Great work!Perfect for sculpting reference...Awesome lightning and beautyful model
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nice work fly guy, and she's got the cutest booty ever!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Beauty!!!
so the date on the camera data reads July 2009... does this mean that Rael C is back modelling for you?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I did shoot with her in July, yeah. We haven't shot very often lately.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
that is the best news I've hard all week! maybe more in the future
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Your work is always impressive, and Rael is always amazing... you work with some great models overall actually. Great work, sir.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
there are moments in my life when i fail to see something worth to save on this planet...
but then there are pictures like this that remind be of beauty and grace of human body..
this picture should be in dictionary right next to the word "graceful"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's a very nice thing to say. 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Maybe I'm wrong, but monochrome shots just seem to pull out texture and features so much more than color. My eyes were immediately drawn to the soles of her feet--such intricate, incredible detail! Just an incredible contrast to the relatively smooth surfaces of Rael's rear, transitioning then into her shoulders, head and hair, then into the "triangles." Thanks for sharing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I agree but I don't know why. Is it just because our brains/eyes are attuned to shadow more than color?
I stopped asking and now I just enjoy it. It is fascinating that monochrome photography, which was really just a side-effect of the processes we understood at the time, is still popular. There is something eye-catching about it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Probably some effect left over from when we were naked primitives being chased by dinosaurs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I do not get a tonal difference from switching from the small to large view of this piece.
Rael knocked it out of the park with the pose.
Why did you chose to emphasize lighting her hands.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't either. But I'm not going to try to tell someone "it's all in your mind" either.
Glad you like the shot. I was pretty happy with it, too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You have to love Rael's poses don't you? Great lighting too Marcus!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, she's pretty easy to get great photos of: point her at a puddle of light and let her go
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Definitely I love they way you play with light. This photo is awesome in it's shape contrast and lighting. Of course you have beautiful models to help a bit 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This is beautiful.
I am not saying the following thing to be rude-- I'm just curious:
Did you photoshop the image at all? Not that it really looks like it, just that her body is so perfect I was wondering.
In any case--nice photograph. I most especially like her hands.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
When I postwork an image I go over every pixel. I generally do minor skin clean-up - if you look you'll notice there isn't a single pimple, mole, or scar on her - and I fairly carefully remove smudges that might distract from background, floor, and props. In this case, there were screw-heads on the box that I removed - you can see where I was a bit sloppy with one on the upper left. So - yeah, I "photoshopped the hell out of it" in one sense. But I didn't change the model's shape or anything like that. Mostly because she was perfect as she was.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ok, thanks.
That's pretty cool.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
you are a master of lighting - in all of your efforts.
this is exceptionally nice ... almost a perfect image ... a beautiful model, her pose reflecting the delicate nature of the human female ... shoulders, wrists, hands ... truly a beautiful shot.
that being said, i wondered if the box she rests on was intentional? by that, i mean the visibility of the texture of the wood ... was it a conscious decision to 'reveal' the wood grain rather than paint it a flat color? ... seems that it would have blended better with the background. just curious...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I sort of like the texture of the wood compared to the model's own texture. That was what I was thinking...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
When I change to full screen view, the toning seems to change, turning into a sepia. Is this just because of the crappy monitor at work? It never happened before...
Anyway, nice shot, I like the non-revealing pose. The lighting is flawless, adding great effect to the gentleness of the photograph.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I have no idea why the tone would shift; unless it's that there's a difference in the reduced-size version that's created by DA's uploader.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Although I don't notice so much on this piece. I notice it most in my own work, b/c I'm, of course, scrutinizing the shit out of it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I hope there isn't any shit in it! I tried to photoshop all that stuff out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>