HOME | DD

Mobiyuz — The Franco-British Union

#alternatehistory #britain #france #alternatehistorymap #francobritishunion
Published: 2020-05-07 11:39:21 +0000 UTC; Views: 10184; Favourites: 151; Downloads: 25
Redirect to original
Description The product of a world war and the result of teeth-clenched cooperation, the Franco-British Union is one of the most unusual thing to ever exist in world history. Not only does it represent the union of two nations that up until that point could charitably have been described as having "troubled" relations for most of their history, the beginning of World War II presented itself as the most desperate hour for both the French Republic and the United Kingdom. Facing a total collapse of the French government, Winston Churchill and leader of the French Forces in Exile Charles de Gaulle proposed a radical solution: to merge the two countries into a single entity, the Franco-British Union, ironically achieving the ancient claim of the United Kingdom to the throne of France. This new state would retain King George V as Head of State, with an elected President as Head of Government to oversee a joint parliament run by a Prime Minister. Cobbled together hastily and without any true regard for the aftermath, the Union came into being fully on 4 June 1940.

The war would drag on for many years, with defeat after defeat until the Nazi war machine drove itself to destruction at the hands of the Allied forces of Franco-Britannnia, the United States, and the Soviet Union. In that year of 1945, the Franco-British Union stood as the largest single empire in the history of mankind, an odd counterpoint to its rival superpowers of the USSR and the USA. One represented Communism, the other Capitalism, and now one represented Imperialism. And yet it was not to be. Within years, the Union was forced to relinquish its hold over India, and from there the Union's overseas territories began to fall out of their grasp. Offered union as equal partners in a supposed "United Commonwealth of Nations", none accepted and instead pushed for full independence, often backed by the USSR or the USA in their effort to dismantle the Union's empire to gain more bargaining chips and pawns for their grand worldwide game against each other.

While the loss of India crippled the Union, it would be Algeria that would finally cause it to collapse in its old form. Algeria, as what had been part of Metropolitan France, was considered an integral territory of the Union, and by consequence it was less of a colonial uprising and more of a full-scale civil war that drained the already teetering finances of the Union further, driving it into spiraling bankruptcy. Already humiliated by the loss of India, the loss of most of their colonies, and worst of all a complete political and military defeat in Egypt over the Suez Canal, the Union was forced to surrender when large-scale anti-imperialist protests broke out across the Union's core territories, collapsing the government of Charles de Gaulle and nearly threatening the downfall of the monarchy.

The dust only cleared when the United States, clearly angered at the utter failure of what should have been its most powerful ally, stepped in to help restore order with massive loans and grants on the promise that the Union restructure itself to allow it to even function at all. To this end the Treaty of Brussels was signed in 1965 that formally recognized the independence of Algeria and pledged an eventual withdrawal from all areas of their combined Empire that did not wish to be integrated into the metropolitan territories of the Union. Ironically during this time the French portion of the Union had begun to beg Queen Elizabeth II for her to step in as an absolute monarch, seeing the calm and measured presence of the Queen as a better leader than the weak and incompetent Presidents that the Union had suffered through.

The Queen naturally refused, but did remain as Head of State of a joint Franco-British Union. But serious internal restructuring was vital, necessary even for the Union to survive at all, be it as a political entity or even just financially. The Union was federated into several regions along the lines of the states of the United States, a new Union Parliament organized with representatives to elect a Prime Minister that would hold full political power while ditching the President of the Union. By only the narrowest margins did states like Northern Ireland and Scotland not vote to leave the Union entirely, and even afterwards many remain unconvinced that the Union is a good thing. The same could be said for many in what was France, who saw the Union as a domination of France by London even if Paris was one of the two official capitals. Only by the narrowest of margins has the Union survived at all, a minor miracle if nothing else. But with a new government, financial assistance from the United States, and a developing plan for decolonization, perhaps the Union can indeed be maintained at all.
Related content
Comments: 14

menapia [2023-03-05 16:03:22 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jeremythedragons [2020-12-13 11:07:37 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

RawFlowers [2020-10-03 12:11:49 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mobiyuz In reply to RawFlowers [2020-10-03 17:40:09 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RawFlowers In reply to Mobiyuz [2020-10-04 05:35:52 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mobiyuz In reply to RawFlowers [2020-10-04 05:38:00 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RawFlowers In reply to Mobiyuz [2020-10-04 05:44:14 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pajf [2020-07-23 18:53:45 +0000 UTC]

👍: 3 ⏩: 0

PersephoneEosopoulou [2020-05-08 23:49:30 +0000 UTC]

Oddly enough if it survives it's issue it might be very strong and influential on the world stage, with the parts of the Anglosphere that in otl are still close to the UK like NZ, Canada and Australia likely still close to it along with parts of the old French colonial empire that in otl are also on somewhat good terms with France and very influenced by it. If nothing else I can't see it's military getting to a point like that in the 80's where Argentina felt it could invade the Falklands.... and if they still did ohh boy will that be one huge kick in the juntas pants.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

cmg7501 [2020-05-07 14:36:36 +0000 UTC]

Honestly feels like they should've set up the capital at Calais or Cherbourg since it’s in between Britain and France. Handing two capitals really sets up a confusing system; they could also do a South Africa thing of having multiple capitals where the monarch resides in London, the parliament resides in Paris, and the Supreme Court goes somewhere in between.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DiscordForcedMe In reply to cmg7501 [2020-05-07 16:25:44 +0000 UTC]

Let's go with Rouen in Normandy as the Capital.

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

cmg7501 In reply to DiscordForcedMe [2020-05-08 00:36:29 +0000 UTC]

I was thinking of the symbolism since Calais was the last of British territory in France. It was the the last remnant of British claim to the throne of France (under Elizabeth I) and even had representatives in the English Parliament until the French reclamation.

Rouen would be a good middle-ground (like as opposed to Cherbourg) but I was thinking symbolism mainly. Like if a the Americas united under one democratic government San Juan (Puerto Rico) should be the Capital because it is an American territory (thus the US, Canada, Belize, and British territories would feel at home) yet a Spanish speaking country (thus Latin America would feel at home).

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

PrQuantum [2020-05-07 13:43:37 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Abbieisurqueen [2020-05-07 13:11:41 +0000 UTC]

Different approach to an Anglo-French/Franco-British union.

👍: 3 ⏩: 0