Comments: 6
Zoomer1958 [2016-07-20 03:51:36 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Phostructor [2016-07-11 11:16:02 +0000 UTC]
This is a technical tour-de-force, and quite lovely. (I'll take your word that it is 'as shot', but it does look a significantly manipulated, or possibly assembled from stock. . .What is the source of the lighting on the foreground?)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
morglin In reply to Phostructor [2016-07-13 06:51:26 +0000 UTC]
Phostructor, it's not assembled from a stock. According with Hugin, the original stitched image covers 311x165 degrees (Mercator projection). The foreground light on the right comes from my head lamp bouncing on the rocks behind. If for "significantly manipulated" you intended color temperature, curves, contrast, dodge and burn so it is , otherwise NO (sky is original, as foreground - no additional layer from stock images or other sources).
In my scrapbook I uploaded an image made of the original jpegs from the camera (obviously I shoot RAW+JPEG, and I used the first for the image above!) as a preview of the final image:
:thumb621342836:
fav.me/da9xj78
Numbers under the thumbs indicate the shooting order.
I didn't use the n 16 in the final pano, that's why I wrote "8+7 vertical shots panorama". You can also see that the sky slightly changed during the sequence, because during twilight sky luminosity varies very fast.
Hope this answers all your questions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Phostructor In reply to morglin [2016-07-13 10:49:22 +0000 UTC]
As I said, a technical tour-de-force! (I hope I didn't imply otherwise.) It is a lovely photo that uses technique in the service of making a very compelling image, rather than for showing off technique.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MirMidPhotos [2016-07-10 02:32:01 +0000 UTC]
Amazing, I really like night shots.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DocMallard [2016-07-09 14:31:00 +0000 UTC]
Excellent!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0