Comments: 28
vokuro-9 [2008-03-17 14:14:49 +0000 UTC]
Yeah excellent !!
I have nothing to say, you told it all in your comment ^_____________^!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vokuro-9 In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-18 14:57:29 +0000 UTC]
you're welcome ^_^ !!
And by the way, thak's for the +fav ! extremely appreciated +++
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ajmanosman In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-14 09:09:22 +0000 UTC]
The fish is on the left side on the top, the pig in the middle on the south
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
munds1984 In reply to Ajmanosman [2008-03-14 12:06:49 +0000 UTC]
hahahaha! Hmmm, I can picture them out. I might change the title as well...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
munds1984 In reply to Ajmanosman [2008-03-16 01:09:51 +0000 UTC]
or would you like to have a collaborative work with me? haha way too impossible as it seems.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ajmanosman In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-16 10:20:51 +0000 UTC]
I would like to do that. But how would we do it?
Digitally would be simple, but I am not very good at that or traditional, we could split a canvas a place it on to eachother digitally if it has the same size?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
munds1984 In reply to Ajmanosman [2008-03-18 10:45:40 +0000 UTC]
well having a collaborative artwork done digitally will be no problem unless we extend it into a somewhat personal collaboration like a commission work, I'll send you my artwork through registered mail then have you work on it then vice versa haha.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ajmanosman In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-18 13:16:50 +0000 UTC]
Yeah we could really do that. But we have to start on something new then. We have to have a size, put up then and have our haves, then we could make something fresh and cool!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
munds1984 In reply to Ajmanosman [2008-03-20 11:27:35 +0000 UTC]
Perhaps, an 8"x11" paper will be a good start.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
munds1984 In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-20 23:14:01 +0000 UTC]
In a more standard form. Yes, that's the one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
noc2 [2008-03-13 06:50:51 +0000 UTC]
i like!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Crowofthepast [2008-03-13 01:19:56 +0000 UTC]
This one is interesting for its movement. Maybe add a dense to sparse contrast to it next time. I has great unity, but lacks contrast some. Other than value contrast.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Crowofthepast In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-13 11:50:16 +0000 UTC]
Like go look at Robert Rauschenberg's, art piece- "Bed" from the 1950s. I think it will help u come up with ways to make this better. I would say look at Mark Rothko, most of his work is repeats... but he drives his point across. I, myself like to look at Richard Diebenkorn. His work is not texture based, but i find it interesting because he smart with composition and adapting to change.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
munds1984 In reply to Crowofthepast [2008-03-13 13:21:56 +0000 UTC]
AH! Rauschenberg, the artist who sent a telegram (not an actual painting) in response to an invitation given to him. I googled the 'Bed' and I found it a bit Dada'esque. Rothko on the other hand, is one of the artists I am currently looking up to. I may apply their styles and assimilate with my own (if I have any) in my future works.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Crowofthepast In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-13 15:45:31 +0000 UTC]
I would never want u to pick up their style of work. I only mentioned them. So u could see others that are similar to u; As well as by seeing one idea from these artist may lead to ur biggest idea in the future that doesn't even relate to ur work now or theirs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1