HOME | DD

munds1984 — Osmosis by-nc-nd

Published: 2008-03-13 00:52:54 +0000 UTC; Views: 424; Favourites: 12; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description ...like a process of absorbing ideas.

Enamel and Acrylic on Eggshell paper

9x12.
Related content
Comments: 28

vokuro-9 [2008-03-17 14:14:49 +0000 UTC]

Yeah excellent !!
I have nothing to say, you told it all in your comment ^_____________^!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munds1984 In reply to vokuro-9 [2008-03-18 10:47:19 +0000 UTC]

thanks, bud

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

vokuro-9 In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-18 14:57:29 +0000 UTC]

you're welcome ^_^ !!
And by the way, thak's for the +fav ! extremely appreciated +++

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munds1984 In reply to vokuro-9 [2008-03-19 00:17:44 +0000 UTC]

You're very much welcome, bud. You deserve a praise

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ajmanosman [2008-03-13 17:53:06 +0000 UTC]

I see a Big pig and a little fish in it !

Like it, but it has a sad undertone, I feel.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munds1984 In reply to Ajmanosman [2008-03-14 00:08:03 +0000 UTC]

WOW there you go again, and your imagination. Now tell me which one is the pig, and the fish?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ajmanosman In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-14 09:09:22 +0000 UTC]

The fish is on the left side on the top, the pig in the middle on the south

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munds1984 In reply to Ajmanosman [2008-03-14 12:06:49 +0000 UTC]

hahahaha! Hmmm, I can picture them out. I might change the title as well...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ajmanosman In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-14 12:26:17 +0000 UTC]

Hahahaha, I'm impessed if you could do that. Is that a challenge my Brotha

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munds1984 In reply to Ajmanosman [2008-03-15 02:04:58 +0000 UTC]

I'll think about it. Would likely be a cool idea!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ajmanosman In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-15 15:32:57 +0000 UTC]

I would be surprised

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munds1984 In reply to Ajmanosman [2008-03-16 01:09:51 +0000 UTC]

or would you like to have a collaborative work with me? haha way too impossible as it seems.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ajmanosman In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-16 10:20:51 +0000 UTC]

I would like to do that. But how would we do it?

Digitally would be simple, but I am not very good at that or traditional, we could split a canvas a place it on to eachother digitally if it has the same size?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munds1984 In reply to Ajmanosman [2008-03-18 10:45:40 +0000 UTC]

well having a collaborative artwork done digitally will be no problem unless we extend it into a somewhat personal collaboration like a commission work, I'll send you my artwork through registered mail then have you work on it then vice versa haha.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ajmanosman In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-18 13:16:50 +0000 UTC]

Yeah we could really do that. But we have to start on something new then. We have to have a size, put up then and have our haves, then we could make something fresh and cool!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munds1984 In reply to Ajmanosman [2008-03-19 00:21:43 +0000 UTC]

working on small sized-canvas/paper would be a good start

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ajmanosman In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-19 21:53:48 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, name a size?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munds1984 In reply to Ajmanosman [2008-03-20 11:27:35 +0000 UTC]

Perhaps, an 8"x11" paper will be a good start.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

munds1984 In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-20 23:14:01 +0000 UTC]

In a more standard form. Yes, that's the one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ajmanosman In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-20 13:03:04 +0000 UTC]

Is that A4?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

noc2 [2008-03-13 06:50:51 +0000 UTC]

i like!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munds1984 In reply to noc2 [2008-03-13 12:57:06 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Crowofthepast [2008-03-13 01:19:56 +0000 UTC]

This one is interesting for its movement. Maybe add a dense to sparse contrast to it next time. I has great unity, but lacks contrast some. Other than value contrast.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munds1984 In reply to Crowofthepast [2008-03-13 05:49:16 +0000 UTC]

That's it! The contrast in the background, the mixture ended up dull ... was I right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Crowofthepast In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-13 11:50:16 +0000 UTC]

Like go look at Robert Rauschenberg's, art piece- "Bed" from the 1950s. I think it will help u come up with ways to make this better. I would say look at Mark Rothko, most of his work is repeats... but he drives his point across. I, myself like to look at Richard Diebenkorn. His work is not texture based, but i find it interesting because he smart with composition and adapting to change.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munds1984 In reply to Crowofthepast [2008-03-13 13:21:56 +0000 UTC]

AH! Rauschenberg, the artist who sent a telegram (not an actual painting) in response to an invitation given to him. I googled the 'Bed' and I found it a bit Dada'esque. Rothko on the other hand, is one of the artists I am currently looking up to. I may apply their styles and assimilate with my own (if I have any) in my future works.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Crowofthepast In reply to munds1984 [2008-03-13 15:45:31 +0000 UTC]

I would never want u to pick up their style of work. I only mentioned them. So u could see others that are similar to u; As well as by seeing one idea from these artist may lead to ur biggest idea in the future that doesn't even relate to ur work now or theirs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

munds1984 In reply to Crowofthepast [2008-03-14 00:05:23 +0000 UTC]

well I'm not going to mimic their style, it's not in my mind. I look up on these people mainly as 'source' of inspiration to what I'm doing. And since I'm not a trained 'artist' (am not even one since I lack proper training and stuff you know) basically it's all self-taught thing and their works simply give me ideas

👍: 0 ⏩: 0