HOME | DD
Muratkivrak β fon ynr II
Published: 2006-09-26 22:53:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 19206; Favourites: 813; Downloads: 205
Redirect to original
Description
this shoot was for Maison Francaise bride. if you want you can see backstage photos here [link]Related content
Comments: 105
wow feel like it's wripped from a horror movie
such an amazing pic!
π: 0 β©: 0
well, if my boyfriend picks me up in his car, I wonΒ΄t be able to enter with this!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
I love the soft expression of her face and the paleness of her skin. it's really fragile looking and beautiful. great hair, too. it's what first caught my eye.
π: 0 β©: 0
Wo, This is really nicee!
But did you blur it in Photoshop or something, or is it just the focus, !
but really pretty (: .
π: 0 β©: 0
wow!! 
Love it!
π: 0 β©: 0
Sixhundredseventieth favourite. 
Congratulations to a fantastic and successful piece!
π: 0 β©: 0
beautiful and inspiring..
am wondering if i can use it for a school project of a magazine cover that i will post here later and give you full credit for the picture?
and if you mind..just tel me so that i dont use it.
thanks
π: 0 β©: 0
i like her facial expression and how bare she looks in contrast to her hair
π: 0 β©: 0
i really like the mood and the model looks sooo nice for this shot...
π: 0 β©: 0
what a strange focus ... have you modify it with PS ?
π: 0 β©: 0
Oh wow...
..this is very beautiful!
π: 0 β©: 0
She looks like a little princess ^^ cute
π: 0 β©: 0
i like this image as far as the lighting, composition and her expression go.. but the blurring is just too much for me. I can appreciate an exaggerated blur, but this seems like you just went a bit too far.
Maybe you were going for an effect that didn't look realtistic, but to me, if the eyes are in focus, other parts of her face that are the same distance away from the lens would also need to be in focus. If you had made, for instance, the base of her nose even just a little more in focus, it wouldn't have bothered me so much.
I'm also confused as to why you left just part of her hair in focus. I'm really interested to know your thoughts on this so I hope you reply!
I still think it's a beautiful image, I would just have liked to see less blurring
π: 0 β©: 1
thanks for your comment
π: 0 β©: 1
sorry, I didn't really understand what you said about the technique camera. Are you saying that the blurring here was caused by the kind of camera you used and not something you added in photoshop?
I know you're from Turkey so English probably isn't your first language, but if you could explain it more clearly that'd be great
π: 0 β©: 1
i did with photoshop but i can do with technique camera
π: 0 β©: 2
take it easy for your discovery
π: 0 β©: 0
i guess i'll have to look up technique cameras bc I have no idea how this would be realistic. I've never heard of it before now.
π: 0 β©: 1
What he did was use Gaussian Blur in photoshop. It was poorly done, and that is why you see a lack of continuity in distances and such.
The effect of a tilt shit lens can give specific focus to an area during a portrait, but they are very hard to use and would yield results unlike the image you see here.
π: 0 β©: 2
I woudln't agree with it being poorly done, the effect from this is so unique and surreal, that's why i like this so much, jsut my opinon.
π: 0 β©: 1
...obviously it's your opinion, as you just stated it. Sorta rhetorical.
It's poorly done because one can see through the technique. Just as a writer who used weak logic to connect two points would be seen as stretching his method thin, and therefor revealing a poor technique.
In any event, it's all a matter of experience and understanding.
π: 0 β©: 1
In any event, it's all a matter of experience and understanding. how do you mean?
π: 0 β©: 1
To the masses, a black & white photograph of a bride where only her roses are in color seems like art to them, most seasoned wedding photographers would agree (at least the few I know) that it's shite and cliche.
Similarly, to the masses, a angled portrait may seem like art to a student graduating, but most seasoned fashion photographers would agree (at least the few I know) that it's shite and cliche.
Addtionally, to the masses, a Guassian blur on a portrait may seem like art to a landscape photographer or dA kiddie, but most seasoned photographers would agree (at least the few I know) that it's shite and cliche.
All about experience, mate.
π: 0 β©: 1
expiereince shouldn't come into art or art appreciation, "All about experience, mate." i presuem you are implying i am not expirienced and you are? not liking your tone my friend, lets leave there shall we.
π: 0 β©: 1
Your skills at deduction are not quite as high as I hoped.
I didn't say "art appreciation", although you could look at it that way, sure. Detecting weak technique, or obvious effects, or cliche techniques, is easier with experience. Simple as that.
Sure, let's leave it there. I couldn't give a shit.
π: 0 β©: 0
Yeah yeah. You're welcome.
π: 0 β©: 0
beautiful picture! very soft and tender..
and what a face!
π: 0 β©: 0
very nice
looks like it should be in a fashion magazine
π: 0 β©: 0
This is absuolutely beautiful! I love everything about it!
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>