HOME | DD

Annon-E-Moose In reply to DrInsanatomy [2018-12-06 12:03:12 +0000 UTC]

You expressed my own feelings, and then some.

It's time for me to join MuscleFan again for a month.  The art there is so awesome I wish I could afford a monthly membership, just to show my appreciation and support.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DrInsanatomy In reply to Annon-E-Moose [2018-12-06 13:08:30 +0000 UTC]

She hulk issuch a hot fantasy, and these are some incredibly skilled artists! That negligee, those breasts....I'm tempted, but I have a problem. Heh, with as extreme as my fantasies get (what can I say, if you look at my own art I draw women with biceps bigger than they are) I'm afraid I'd be disappointed with how "small" their muscles are compared to my fantasies - I always want FMG artists to shock me with their extremity, and very few do. Extreme female hypermuscle is hard to pull off, but I keep hoping. Heh, if their She hulk actually did hulk out again and flex up biceps that were many times taller than her entire body overflowed the bed with breast flesh, I'd probably plunk down the change in the hopes of seeing more like that, and even more extreme, but rarely do FMG artist push biceps even a foot higher than their heads (most never so half that), nor do they often do larger than jumbo beach balls for their boobs. Heh, I'm admittedly crazy, but I can't help it - this is such a sexy fantasy for me though, Jen has so much erotic possibility here!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Annon-E-Moose In reply to DrInsanatomy [2018-12-11 00:49:22 +0000 UTC]

I agree with every word, and then some.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DrInsanatomy In reply to Annon-E-Moose [2018-12-25 23:48:26 +0000 UTC]

Hah, so you know my feeling looking at these beautifully drawn ladies and saying - shit, those muscles look too small to shock me!  I hope to get them to push themselves to madness someday and flex those muscles to such ludicrous sizes that we would have to park vehicles and dinosaurs next to them just to get an idea of how many multiples times those bulging bicep peaks surpass them!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Annon-E-Moose In reply to DrInsanatomy [2018-12-26 18:20:05 +0000 UTC]

Yup.

My only requirement is that the muscles be proportional and hypothetically plausible. So I just assume the underlying skeletal and bodily tissues could support the sort of stress put upon them by monstrous muscles.  But everything must look somewhat balanced.  That would tend to rule out extraneous muscle which would serve no purpose, such as biceps sticking out several feet, for example.  (So I do insist upon some limits, after all.)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DrInsanatomy In reply to Annon-E-Moose [2018-12-27 06:45:19 +0000 UTC]

I WISH my limits were that constrained (although I DO have them despite what some people may think, they are just pretty far beyond the norm) it would make finding gems of ludicrous muscular insanity so much easier!

I do kinda hate the giantess look - I prefer the hands and feet to remain relatively small and dainty and the bones to not get stretched TOO much - my fetish for insane muscular size doesn't work as well for me if the body is huge as well - the muscles can't seem as gloriously insane if they aren't ludicrously out of proportion to the frame of the woman - so proportion is important to me as well, but in kind of a strange way by some standards.  I'd rather have a short girl with relatively normal bone structure just loaded down with so much muscle that she'd be grabbing objects between her bulging muscle fibers because they'd reach things before her hands could.

I figure if fantasy worlds can have superheroes that can move planets, as long as it LOOKS like it could somehow be possible, it's enough for me - particularly if the details suggest actual muscle fibers, flexion etc.

The excitement really STARTS for me when a woman's hand can't even reach half way to the top of her own bicep - I guess it has to get to that point before it truly shocks me, which makes it really hard to find!  I think my limit is when all the individual muscle groups (and of course her juicy boobs) get too many times the size of the rest of the woman.  Well, with the muscles when they are flexed (I like to imagine a pretty absurd amount of expansion on flexing, so what looks good to me as normal working proportions for a woman, while still pretty ludicrously huge - my drawing of Cammy is a good example - is nowhere near what I'd like to see from those muscles flexed).  I think too big for me starts to happen when the muscles are over three times larger than her height head to toe, that's the point, at least in my own drawings, where things start to become less of a turn on and more just abstract art.

Notice I say that's when it starts to happen - I have a hazy range that I could theoretically be turned on by, but often won't be because it's just too hard to pull off in a way that still allows me to appreciate the female body those muscles and boobs are attached too! I know without a doubt that once you can no longer find the woman, or she's pretty much just a dot in her muscles it doesn't do anything for me - I also can't get behind the infinite masses of undifferentiated muscle I see from some artists -while I follow him, SAXXON is an example of what I would consider too much. Among my own work, I think Neo-urd is probably nearing my limit.

Heh, so i love too big, just not TOO too big!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SaulJinzler In reply to Artmaster6778757 [2019-01-02 03:45:36 +0000 UTC]

please do!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0