HOME | DD

Nanaga β€” Pokeddex7: Joltik

Published: 2011-12-13 05:07:14 +0000 UTC; Views: 4360; Favourites: 147; Downloads: 62
Redirect to original
Description Day 7 of POKEDDEX: Bug

Joltik is sooooooooooooo cute. X3 Watching its sprite animation is crack - so cute on so many levels. It was also an interesting type pairing: Bug/Electric, which made Joltik even more unique.
Related content
Comments: 16

katamariluv [2021-08-19 02:53:24 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kookaman25 [2019-11-18 03:54:49 +0000 UTC]

Lucas the spider as a PokΓ©mon

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CuttleDreams [2012-11-27 13:35:41 +0000 UTC]

I love the expression on its face!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nanaga In reply to CuttleDreams [2012-11-28 00:28:57 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CuttleDreams In reply to Nanaga [2012-11-29 02:18:01 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

rotten-orange [2012-10-09 19:13:58 +0000 UTC]

So cute!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nanaga In reply to rotten-orange [2012-10-09 19:28:16 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AngelOfBlood13 [2011-12-15 06:50:57 +0000 UTC]

can't....handle...the cuteness....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pro-roro [2011-12-13 22:44:08 +0000 UTC]

... I don't know how you did it, but you made Joltik so CUTE!!!!
AHH!!!! CUUUUUUTTTTEEEEE!!!

Is Joltik the only electric bug type?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nanaga In reply to Pro-roro [2011-12-14 01:48:27 +0000 UTC]

lol XD I'm glad you approve XD

I believe so, him and it's evolution.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Pro-roro In reply to Nanaga [2011-12-15 02:36:11 +0000 UTC]

Interesting. First bug electric of it's kind. Is it good?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nanaga In reply to Pro-roro [2011-12-15 02:42:30 +0000 UTC]

Eh, it's alright. Being a bug, it still has a lot of weaknesses. Then again I haven't used it enough to really know.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Pro-roro In reply to Nanaga [2011-12-15 21:11:31 +0000 UTC]

Ah ic.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Rukonex [2011-12-13 05:08:13 +0000 UTC]

Joltik and Galvantula are the best electric/bug pokemon ever!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nanaga In reply to Rukonex [2011-12-13 15:52:57 +0000 UTC]

The one and only! XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rukonex In reply to Nanaga [2011-12-13 23:32:04 +0000 UTC]

Yeah!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0