Comments: 17
GreenSprite [2011-08-15 07:57:46 +0000 UTC]
Hah, cute.
I don't have any criticism: your style is spot-on for a cartoon. It's readable, pleasant to look at and even the colour scheme is realistic. There's no need to include "special effects" (such as the cloud or the shadow). They may even detract from the main point of the drawing if you overdo them, but I don't think that's the case here.
Sure, some people will tell you need to make smoother lines, always colour within the lines and stuff like that. But frankly, I don't think that's necessary. There's a place for messier styles of drawing and they sometimes feel more alive/interesting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
naught101 In reply to GreenSprite [2011-08-16 09:33:02 +0000 UTC]
Awesome, thanks for the that. Much appreciated.
I agree, I like a bit of mess, but I also think it's valuable to be able to do both messy and clean well. I will be trying more clean stuff (with less realistic effects) soon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jish-G [2011-01-03 22:59:18 +0000 UTC]
Haha, Brilliant. The colours are really nicely blended.
His right foot (our left) looks like it needs to be angled a little further away from the viewer, less front-on. It could also be a little bigger. Also the bear needs to be showing a bit more booty! The curve of the bum on the right hand side makes him seem a little off-balanced. I think it should be flatter on the bottom to give the bear a real sense of size and weight.
Other than what other people have mentioned it's all really good. The hands and the face are great!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
naught101 In reply to Jish-G [2011-01-03 23:36:39 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, they're two things that I also noticed, but I'd already coloured them, and couldn't be arsed fixing it. I think I'm seeing a pattern here.
Cheers
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wastelander7 [2011-01-03 18:50:08 +0000 UTC]
*chuckle* maybe he should come back down and ask for a rematch? hehehehehe
In reality no human can match the strength and ferocity of a polar bear, I don't care what your technique is.
Only two things I can see that need improvement, and they're not biggies. First the cloud seems to have a "halo" around the bottom edge. Could I suggest doing the sky as one layer and putting the cloud on another layer? Might save some trouble. Second, the ocean doesn't go to the bottom of the left hand of the page. Quick fix would be to smear it in.
Again, not biggies. Otherwise it's pretty dang good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
andowa [2011-01-03 18:07:59 +0000 UTC]
hey, I did a version of yours. It just came over me *grin*
hope you like it [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
naught101 In reply to andowa [2011-01-03 21:42:53 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, that was a bit of a toss up. Really I should have gone for a cross between the two, but I'm not really good at expressions yet.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1