HOME | DD

Nickala — Kakei -Tower Ref-

#alien #etea #kakei #oct #refsheet #nalei #towertournament
Published: 2012-05-25 01:55:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 948; Favourites: 5; Downloads: 23
Redirect to original
Description (Just copy-pasted my stuff without looking it over... almost can guarantee she's changed.)

Start Comic Here
Here's Kakei's ref for the Tower.


(Random Fact If I were to assign her a theme song, it would be this one: www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oLqP6… which would also be Tiaidi's theme... that'd be Kakei's country, BTW.)

She is, hands-down, my favorite character right now... No pressure or anything. I know how hard it is to get other people's characters right, so I wrote this wall of text to help out.

I typed this all in one sitting, so forgive me if I left anything off or am incomprehensible in bits...

Kakei’s personality and bio:
Kakei is a spirited little alien. She won’t go down without a fight. You can kill her. Just keep in mind that she’ll do her best to cause your char grief while they’re trying to murder her. It’s not in her nature to give up.
Kakei isn’t a killing machine. She’ll kill if she has to, but she’s not an evil, messed up nutcase. Sure, she’s not currently in her right mind but grief and injury can do that to a person. So she is available to tag along that is, if you want.
Kakei is prone to be somewhat more silent than usual. But she’ll still talk a lot. Mostly sarcastic remarks, movie references (she loves movies from Earth, but will watch any alien film), and talk about guns.
Kakei is a mechanic. She specializes in making guns, but given her current circumstances, she’s really good at quick fixes and cannibalizing broken things for parts.
Kakei has a Napoleon complex. She HATES being called short and will get instantly grouchy if someone calls her shorty. Similarly, she doesn’t like being called ‘cute,’ ‘adorable,’ or any other variation.
And on that note… Kakei has a bit of a temper.
Kakei is a rebel… no, not the kind that dyes their hair and wears punk clothing to rebel against her parents. The kind that fights for her planet’s freedom from an alien species –the Si’ne. Her mother, Neli, has trained her in combat… Kakei can fight like a pro.
On that line of thought, Kakei prefers sneaky/intelligent battle tactics. She won’t run in yelling and hollering. She’ll take you out from the shadows.
Kakei’s mom, Neli, is a scary woman. Highly xenophobic and believes very strongly in ‘tough love.’ Just figured I’d put that out there.
Kakei’s dad, Keno, is dead. She got to spend some of her early childhood with him, but not much. He died of a degenerative genetic disease called Mide. Kakei is at risk, but there is no way it would affect her in the Tower. Much less kill her.
Kakei ADORES fish. That is, the taste of fish. She’ll eat them whole, raw, cooked, sautéed, grilled, fried, or any other way.
Kakei is fighting to bring back loved ones, basically. She’s desperate to fix what she’d caused. She’d even take a Matrix-like illusion of everything being okay than the real deal… or living with her mistake.
Kakei is not likely to talk about her past. It’s just a big no-no for her.
Kakei lost her original lung recently so she got a transplant. Thanks to Etea medicine, she will make a full recovery. She’s near the tail end of the recovery, but she’s still weakened. The pills are to help with that, but nothing substitutes for full health.
Kakei is afraid of needles. Even more of surgery. And worse of death. Kakei is willing to die for a very select few things and people. Right now, she’s willing to die to fix her mistake.

Etea bio:
Eteai (plural form of Etea) hear through special nerve endings in their skin. This means that different sounds have certain feels. Loud sounds don’t hurt, but unpleasant sounds do. Their hearing is excellent; however, if the material the sound is coming through isn’t sound-conductive, it does affect them, so keep that in mind. Sand would be an example of a non-conductive material. *wink*
Eteai have a second set of jaws that hold sharp shark-like teeth. These pop out when an Etea is eating or pissed.
Etea saliva contains a toxin that causes burning with the initial bite and illness later (meaning a few hours to a day later). It’s harmless as long as it doesn’t get in the eyes or in an open cut.
Eteai have one two chamber lung that can partially process water. There is a limit to how long they can process water, so drowning Kakei might take a little while.
Think of Kakei like a bird. Her metabolism is fast, she’s a little high-strung, and she’s small and light. That, and her vocal chords produce bird-like sounds. Her translator will make her sound like a human or whatever else she might be talking to, though.
Eteai sleep hanging upside-down.
That hair isn’t hair. They’re smaller versions of those two big antennae, so yes, they can move. They also do a good job at picking up changes in air pressure which helps in flight. Also, they don’t grow back and they’re highly sensitive. Messing with those would cause a lot of pain.
Similarly, the two big antennae sticking out of her head are nerve-rich and sensitive. They’re mostly packed with the hearing nerve endings, but also the normal variety.
Those two wings can fold up inside wing pockets just under Kakei’s skin. They are supported by cartilage, muscle, and special pockets that hold compressed air. Eteai inflate these with the breathing holes on their back. These holes also connect to the second chamber of the lung.
Eteai eyes are encased in a hard, clear covering. The deep grey part is a motion-sensitive ‘goo.’ This works in low lighting, but it doesn’t work well. Eteai are diurnal. The eyeball works more or less like your average eye. Inside, the white eyeball can move around fairly freely via muscles. Sorta like how a slug moves it’s eyes.
Etea memory is very vivid and very clear. Kakei can remember details well. This also makes painful memories that much more painful.
Female Eteai implant larvae in plants with their tail. Therefore, it’s hollow.

Notes about the ref:
She is not wearing any armor. This is because armor is vital for her rebel group in the war, and she doesn’t want to take any.
An Aeoi is a memory storage device. No, not computer files, actual memories.
The scribbles next to her name at the top are Moala for ‘Kakei.’ So her name’s on there twice.
Well, thrice counting the bottom bit. That’s what her name means.
All the colors in the palette aren’t fully labeled. I trust you can figure out which thing is colored what, though. I recycled the clothing colors for the weapons as well.
Related content
Comments: 23

GreaseRoach [2013-10-10 04:26:34 +0000 UTC]

This is a well-thought out species and all, but there is one thing which is really bothering me. Forgive me if this sounds nit-picky/anal, but there is a huge, huge implausibility with egg-laying sapient creatures (and I mean HUGE; it is well outside of the realm of reason). The description of this satire piece of mine explains why: exodrake.deviantart.com/art/Th…

(I apologize for the passive-aggressive tone of that description; it is not in any way directed towards you. I made that rant because of criticism of my Exodrake species a while back which has dissipated after I posted those rebuttals)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nickala In reply to GreaseRoach [2013-10-10 05:52:52 +0000 UTC]

Oh, I didn't fully explain how that works.  The embryo develops over the winter months (somewhat slowly) inside the mother before they're put into the plants, so that could be when the brain develops, I guess.  I can't say I knew that was a problem before now, though.  No chance a brain can develop after hatching?  I mean, we are talking about what could or could not be possible in life that may or may not have developed outside of Earth norms.  Ah well, I'm going for pseudoscience anyway, because how likely are any of my designs, really?


And you've stumbled upon a somewhat old reference.  The species has changed a bit since then, but I haven't posted anything recent thanks to college studio hours.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

GreaseRoach In reply to Nickala [2013-10-10 18:59:09 +0000 UTC]

I have an idea which retains the general idea but eliminates the egg factor. The eggs just have to go because they are restrictive prisons which work for blue-collar animals and birds, but not creatures of or above our complexity.

How about they develop internally until their brain is functional enough (I'm thinking winter to winter, to keep the seasonal thing), then give birth to a larval offspring inside of a plant where it feeds and develops limbs? Because their birthing apparatus is so narrow, it could explain the need to develop limbs externally, but the brain has to be set up before it becomes conscious because if it's not, there's no need to ever develop that higher complexity later because the organism is more than smart enough to survive as-is. Does any of this make sense or am I just rambling?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nickala In reply to GreaseRoach [2013-10-10 22:08:50 +0000 UTC]

Actually, that was the original idea, but... it's just easier to say "lays an egg."  I guess the original idea got lost somewhere along the way.  I need to pick your brain more often, you know what you're talking about.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GreaseRoach In reply to Nickala [2013-10-11 00:28:33 +0000 UTC]

Why not just say they plant a larva? That's easy too

I am always standing by to give advice with making realistic sapient races.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nickala In reply to GreaseRoach [2013-10-11 01:05:21 +0000 UTC]

I are not gud with words.


I will keep that in mind!  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GreaseRoach In reply to Nickala [2013-10-11 01:13:21 +0000 UTC]

Yay, my infodumping accomplished something!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nickala In reply to GreaseRoach [2013-10-11 01:20:12 +0000 UTC]

Yaaay!    I'd prolly write a big infodump journal you can refer people to... or... several.  Hoo boy, that one thing you linked to was scathing!  Did someone get really pissy with your Exodrake design?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GreaseRoach In reply to Nickala [2013-10-11 01:35:18 +0000 UTC]

No, I'm just an aspie and as it happens, one of my greatest pressure points is implausible species designs and being picked on because I base my species on truth, not ideals. I can't stand the hypocrisy of someone who makes rainbow-colored amphibian people telling me my Exodrakes would never exist because they are too human-like. Humans are the only known sapient creatures, which makes them the only sapient creature design confirmed to work. Forgive me if I choose to stand on the shoulders of giants.

Although I did have a select few people act all condescending and presumptuous, calling the females "traps" and refusing to stop calling them by male pronouns. That got irritating.

Also I've had art of them turned down by clubs centered around dragon/human romance. In one case the admin kept telling me they are human/dragon hybrids. NO THEY ARE NOT. But she wouldn't listen. She was adamant they are hybrids just because they don't have a "goat-like muzzle". Oh, but the toothless/hiccup art spam is A-OK. Because Toothless has a goat-like muzzle.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nickala In reply to GreaseRoach [2013-10-11 02:05:54 +0000 UTC]

Fellow aspie!  I'm not as much about the biology as the design, but I'm an artist first, so forgive me if all of my stuff is riddled with inaccuracies.  XD  I just find I need at least a bit of biology because there is a great deal of cultural stuff linked to basic (or not so basic) biology.  I am more about how possible cultures might come from certain types of creatures and worlds, plausible or not, so I do have other actual sentient egg-layers among my babies, whoops.  Ah well, I like the science-is-magic branch of science fiction, anyway.  I can go a bit crazier with everything which suits me.  I admire people who design critters like you do!  I'd have trouble with it, and I don't even pretend to lecture people on xenobiology.


It is irritating when groups keep turning down your work for no good reason... and it is also irritating when people get on your case about stuff when it makes no sense that they should (what you did was infodumping, not getting on my case, and you obviously know your shit ).


And the worst part of all, people being condescending...  It's like a kick in the teeth.  :C

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GreaseRoach In reply to Nickala [2013-10-11 06:34:09 +0000 UTC]

I don't mind pure fantasy as it often has a retroactive effect on suspension of disbelief - it causes a phenomenon where it doesn't even try to begin with so it's just a fun fantastic ride. Science fiction all too often peeves me since it tends to ditch the "science" aspect. I can accept One Piece more than I can Halo, for instance. Ugh the eggabooism in that series. Get it out of my face before I erupt.

I have a lot of pet peeves with fantasy egg-laying species because nobody ever takes into account the limitations of egg-laying. There's always a tradeoff. You can't have therian mammal complexity with oviparity.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nickala In reply to GreaseRoach [2013-10-11 15:29:55 +0000 UTC]

Well,either way you slice it, we're both creating species that do not and will not exist. There is more than one way to write science fiction, and if I took your approach, I would no longer have fun with it. Please do not tell me how I should practice one of my favorite hobbies. There are more branches of science you can include in science fiction than biology.

I'm sorry you seem to take offense to the way I do it. I'm also sorry people are being idiots with you. I am not one of those people and I would appreciate it if you not attack people who go at the genre of science fiction in a similar manner to me while speaking with me. It's very similar to what the idiots are doing to you and I can assure you, it feels just about as nice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GreaseRoach In reply to Nickala [2013-10-11 19:19:34 +0000 UTC]

Ich, I'm sorry if I got a little snippy there. If that's how you enjoy doing things then by all means continue. I was just venting a general pet peeve because it seems you're willing to hear me out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nickala In reply to GreaseRoach [2013-10-11 20:15:59 +0000 UTC]

That's okay! I totally understand where you're coming from, except I catch a lot of flak from the guys trying to be accurate (same problem, opposite sides). People get crazy about certain things in science fiction sometimes. I was just feeling a little attacked, but it was a misunderstanding! I'm sorry for snapping. C:

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GreaseRoach In reply to Nickala [2013-10-11 20:22:55 +0000 UTC]

No it's okay. I need a dose of your perspective because I get so overzealous and anal with realism sometimes. I just want to say that I don't mind a lot of science fiction ideas, like speedy space travel. I very specifically have a pet peeve for the oviparous race thing, and female aliens being given human secondary sex characteristics verbatim, especially when they are given faux "boobs". Most other sci-fi I can live with. Fantasy technology is fine by me because, hell, the iPhone I typed this message on was science fiction in the 80's. I like seeing diverse alien races as long as they have the advantages we have which are needed for intelligence, or analogues to them. There are many ways this can work so for me, it still leaves lots of room to be creative.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nickala In reply to GreaseRoach [2013-10-11 22:07:43 +0000 UTC]

And I could always use a dose of yours, as well!  I can tell you're very passionate about this.  XD


Speedy space travel is convenient for plot devices and such.  While I have seen some excellent stories with more realistic space travel times (i.e. slower than light), there are so many things with that method of travel that lend themselves more to psychological exploration than space exploration.  After all, that is essentially a one-way trip depending on how far out the spacecraft is going, so you can kiss your loved ones, your home, and a normal life goodbye.


Science fiction writers do tend to go overboard with "these aliens lay eggs!!"  I'll bet it's a trope by now.  That and reproduction via cloning (which has some serious genetic variation repercussions unless they factor in variation).  Oh man, I had a friend that really got on me about "why doesn't she have boobs?!" it gets really annoying explaining over and over that they don't lactate, they're not mammals, etc etc etc...


I guess I'll be keeping that egg thing in mind from now on!  It's amazing what you keep learning from making made-up alien species...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GreaseRoach In reply to Nickala [2013-10-12 18:40:03 +0000 UTC]

Lately I've begun to accept the idea of yin and yang. One clause suggests that truth and ideals, while different, are both equally right. I personally like to keep them separate, though. For instance, the conventions I use for designing (semi) original Fandomon versus Pesticide ad Hominem cast members are eons apart. In my opinion (I know others feel differently), realism and idealism are like bleach and toilet bowl cleaner. They're great on their own when used properly and neither is really better than the other, but mixing them produces toxic results. This is just my obviously unpopular opinion though. I can see why people enjoy moderate doses of both in their fiction.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nickala In reply to GreaseRoach [2013-10-12 19:18:35 +0000 UTC]

I'm obviously of a differing opinion, but if everyone mixed "toilet bowl cleaner" and "bleach" it'd be boring as hell.  Same as if everyone only strictly used each separately.  I've seen fantastic stories that used elements of idealism and realism.  Sure, there are parts that make you cringe because you know the science is wacky, but that shouldn't ruin the story.  And I've seen both elements mixed beautifully.  Ever read the Young Wizard series?  It's heavy on the fantasy, but it mixes elements of science fiction and I love it to pieces.  Again, I am more about building worlds and exploring them and less about being in a realistic setting.  I read and write and create to take a break from the real world because sometimes the real world sucks (but it has it's moments).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GreaseRoach In reply to Nickala [2013-10-12 20:48:46 +0000 UTC]

Yeah sometimes it is executed well. Pokemon is a fine example. Sure they aren't realistic, but the pseudoscience makes them acceptable enough. Sometines I can let an implausibility here or there go because one bad apple can't spoil the whole orchard right? I don't mind using pseudoscience to add believability because I do that a lot in Fandomon. I present the creatures as being entirely engineered by man as a scheme to get obscenely rich. How else can I explain someone tossing a Rob Swire out of a Pokeball? The best way is to say it's just an artificially engineered monster which looks like Rob Swire. It's a lot more acceptable than leaving it without explanation like Touhoumon

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nickala In reply to GreaseRoach [2013-10-14 19:00:10 +0000 UTC]

Interesting.  o.o

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GreaseRoach In reply to Nickala [2013-10-14 22:17:33 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I don't know how to explain it, it's this weird sort of double standard which has everything to do with presentation. It's like shipping; I don't mind people slashing what they please, as long as they don't try presenting it as fact. If they acknowledge it's just fantasy I'm cool with it hut when they try validating their implausible slash pairing, it sets off a red flag in my brain. I think this is the same psychological basis for my views on fantasy creatures. Dunno it's weird, and tbh I feel guilty because I wish I could just carelessly enjoy fantasy creatures like most people :/

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GreaseRoach In reply to Nickala [2013-10-10 18:44:49 +0000 UTC]

Actually, no it's not because the early prenatal developmental phases are essential for setting up the extremely complex structure. This is an issue of physics, which apply everywhere in the universe. Being aliens doesn't resolve the impossibility.

Also what is the point of laying eggs after a period of internal development? It accomplishes nothing except greatly reducing the survival rate. Also since eggs are limited in size by physics, they physically cannot hold the large brain and the large amount of energy which would still be needed. No matter how you spin it, it's impossible. At best, it is extremely impractical, which equates to impossible in terms of evolution because the most practical designs always win.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nickala In reply to GreaseRoach [2013-10-10 22:06:19 +0000 UTC]

 Worth asking.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0