TerraRhapsody [2009-12-14 15:45:26 +0000 UTC]
So sweet and simple! very nice job
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NightmareTF In reply to TerraRhapsody [2009-12-14 17:31:12 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! The minimalism was intended, indeed .
TerraRhapsody In reply to NightmareTF [2009-12-15 10:17:04 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
boot-cheese-3000 [2009-12-09 06:44:52 +0000 UTC]
nice abstract fractal.
NightmareTF In reply to boot-cheese-3000 [2009-12-09 08:44:20 +0000 UTC]
Thanks!
GamerWorld14 [2009-12-08 05:07:56 +0000 UTC]
Does having an oversample of 2 really change it that much. I usually render at 1 for oversample. Should I change?? But then again, I am rendering at ~9000 quality. What are the best values to render at?I really like this piece, nice job!
NightmareTF In reply to GamerWorld14 [2009-12-08 09:02:02 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much!When you set the oversample higher, Apophysis renders it bigger than the actual resolution and then downsizes afterwards, meaning a better quality picture. Probably most useful for large prints.There is really no best render option, just preference.Going for 9000 quality and no oversample (1 is normal resolution) seems like a good option to me as well .
GamerWorld14 In reply to NightmareTF [2009-12-09 20:05:42 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for the tip, I will keep these in mind while doing my next render.
BellicoseBreakfast [2009-04-20 06:32:57 +0000 UTC]
Certainly has been a while.Pretty intriguing. Nice contrast of smooth and sharp.
NightmareTF In reply to BellicoseBreakfast [2009-04-20 10:36:50 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much