HOME | DD

NightSheep — Post Processing IR Photo's

Published: 2008-06-30 15:03:31 +0000 UTC; Views: 44925; Favourites: 355; Downloads: 1441
Redirect to original
Description Since I have been telling (about) the same story to other people, I decided to make this very quick tutorial as a quick reference guide of how your photo should look like after each steps.

--- edit
I can't believe this Quick & Dirty tutorial receives more hits then any of my other photo's in this gallery. I guess I write better then I take photo's -_-.

Anyway, it made me to decide to expand this tutorial a bit. Let me know how you like the result.


--- 2nd edit
Added the Post Processing Section...


--- Nota bene!!
The example photo's were NOT taken with an IR filter. Instead, I have modified my camera so that I can use lower shutter times. If you are using an IR filter, you need to use longer shutter times up to seconds!!

The colors you get and the post processing steps should be the same though!

Good luck!
Related content
Comments: 148

NML-Photography [2012-09-25 17:00:48 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the info.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to NML-Photography [2012-09-26 08:47:01 +0000 UTC]

I have browsed your gallery, and I highly doubt you need this info. But you are ofcourse very welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NML-Photography In reply to NightSheep [2012-09-26 16:35:31 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, I always like to brush up on my photography knowledge, and learn from anywhere I can. Thanks again.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MaliciousMarine [2012-06-26 16:55:44 +0000 UTC]

Great tut..thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Randomguyisme [2011-08-03 17:23:03 +0000 UTC]

This tutotial is very helpful however I can't get the white balance to work properly all changeing it seems to do is change the colour of the tint Is there anyway of makeing the tinted image look good during post processing?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to Randomguyisme [2011-08-04 09:59:24 +0000 UTC]

"White balance" is not the same as changing the tint. It's more like: "Tell me which point should be white, and I will recalculate all colors so it matches the differences between 'white', and the point that should be white". Yes, it is sometimes hard to get it correct due to various reasons.

But like you said, "all it seems to do is the change of the colours of the tint". With other words, you could change the tint of your image to get better results in post processing!

Let's say you find your image too red, then you can simply lower the red's in your photo (by adding a Color Balance layer over your photo).

See if that helps?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Randomguyisme In reply to NightSheep [2011-08-04 22:26:33 +0000 UTC]

Adding a color balance layer in Photoshop doesn't really help, all I am able to do with it is to change the colour of the tint some more.

[link] this is what changing the white balance did. it didn't seem to make any of the photos anymore white just changed the tint.

I was just wondering if there was anyway of editing these images to make them look like other IR images I have seen, like your example, but all I can do with these images is to make them black and white like this [link]

I will keep experimenting with the white balance to see if I can get the photos to comeout how i want, but if it doesnt work I will just have to make do with makeing them black and white

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to Randomguyisme [2011-08-06 20:57:45 +0000 UTC]

Ah... i have found that in Photoshop, the correct way to set the white balance is using the "Curve" layer. (Sorry, I have been working with lightroom for a few years now, so I forgot most of the photoshop things already I did).

Anyway, add a "Curves" layer so you can adjust the curve. On the left (Photoshop CS5) you will see 3 color pickers. The last one is the one for setting the so called white point. That is what you need.

Now select this picker and selects in the picture the leave which is the most white. When clicking on it, Photoshop will try to recalculate the curve to make the selected point really white. If you accidentally clicked on something really dark, you will see that your photo will turn over lighted.

To answer your second answer: Yes, I have seen scripts for photoshop and lightroom for this. But I have never used it since I was not really convinced of the result.

Good luck!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Randomguyisme In reply to NightSheep [2011-08-07 01:24:04 +0000 UTC]

ahh thanks I have never used curves before and had no idea what it did. I did a quick test and I was able to make something sort of alright, but I think will have to take some better IR pictures to experiment with.

Thanks for the help

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to Randomguyisme [2011-08-07 16:55:49 +0000 UTC]

Good to hear. Good luck from here!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

girl-from-Gaia [2011-07-29 20:25:01 +0000 UTC]

Thanx for the tutorial, it helps a lot!

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kattyz90 [2011-05-28 10:39:55 +0000 UTC]

thanks heaps for this! just bought my first IR filter, totally wanna learn how to use it. this type of photography is amazing!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to kattyz90 [2011-05-28 11:51:37 +0000 UTC]

You are very very welcome. Good luck!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JadedShard [2011-01-04 04:41:34 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much for creating this! I just got an IR filter and was trying to find something online to explain how to use it properly but could find nothing. Thankfully I checked on DA and saw this. IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW. Thank you again for creating this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to JadedShard [2011-01-04 10:31:24 +0000 UTC]

You are very welcome. Glad to hear it makes sense now. Send me a note once you have some wonderful IR to show?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

taorio [2010-12-28 16:59:00 +0000 UTC]

thanks for this info!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DemonOfThorns [2010-12-15 23:36:53 +0000 UTC]

How did you modify your camera for IR?
and do you have some comparison photos of IR photos taken with the filter and IR photos with modified camera?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

parochena [2010-10-15 14:57:15 +0000 UTC]

Mr Nightsheep! You've inspired me to do this for my second project on my course! ;D I just need to figure it out etc.. hhaaha!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to parochena [2010-10-15 15:30:02 +0000 UTC]

Miss Paulie... why are you calling me "Mr"? I feel so old now . . .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parochena In reply to NightSheep [2010-10-15 15:33:01 +0000 UTC]

Oh I'm sorryyyy!! It's habit hehe! ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to parochena [2010-10-15 16:05:29 +0000 UTC]

Your habit is making people feeling old? Wow!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parochena In reply to NightSheep [2010-10-15 18:34:08 +0000 UTC]

Noooooo!!! calling people mister

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to parochena [2010-10-16 06:22:15 +0000 UTC]

So... what course are you enrolled to?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parochena In reply to NightSheep [2010-10-16 06:24:07 +0000 UTC]

Photography hehe! I'm doing black and white portraits for my first project and then I was thinking about IR landscapes for my second...(coz they look so damn cool!)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to parochena [2010-10-16 06:27:56 +0000 UTC]

Oooh! Why do you live so far away? I would have loved to join your course!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parochena In reply to NightSheep [2010-10-16 16:42:41 +0000 UTC]

Hehe! I'm sure they do them! I chose to do portraits and IR photography

Most are doing emotions or something....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to parochena [2010-10-16 18:56:54 +0000 UTC]

IR photography is not easy actually. And you need special gear. (IR filter at least).

Teenagers and emotions... that will just result in a lot of emo-styled shots...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parochena In reply to NightSheep [2010-10-16 23:50:16 +0000 UTC]

Exactly.. I wanted to push myself

Apart from an IR filter and setting the white balance.. tripod... is there anything else you need?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to parochena [2010-10-17 00:06:42 +0000 UTC]

patience, niece view and bit of sunlight. A remote would be nice, but not mandatory. You could use the camera timer as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parochena In reply to NightSheep [2010-10-17 15:48:33 +0000 UTC]

Oooh why remote/camera timer??

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to parochena [2010-10-17 16:21:25 +0000 UTC]

to minimize the chance of movement blur. If you have to touch the camera to activate the shutter, you might move the camera a bit which causes blur.

In my personal opinion, if the exposure time is above 5 seconds (or something like that) it doesn't really matter. The first 5 seconds won't expose the sensor enough to register any movement.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parochena In reply to NightSheep [2010-10-19 01:36:08 +0000 UTC]

Oooh makes sense! Good job I have a remote then! ;D
I need to figure it all out... scared of changing my camera settings though! Arghhhhh!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to parochena [2010-10-19 01:59:15 +0000 UTC]

If it is the custom white balance you are referring to, that can always be discarded by setting it back to auto white balance.

The rest is business as usual.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parochena In reply to NightSheep [2010-10-19 02:09:45 +0000 UTC]

Oh okay! I thought it was more??!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to parochena [2010-10-19 02:11:23 +0000 UTC]

Euhm... the long exposure setting? Manual Focus?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parochena In reply to NightSheep [2010-10-19 02:48:51 +0000 UTC]

Yaarrr

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to parochena [2010-10-19 08:36:11 +0000 UTC]

You will manage.... you know how to ice skate. Someone who knows how to do that knows how to do everything!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parochena In reply to NightSheep [2010-10-19 21:39:16 +0000 UTC]

Hahaha!! Aww thanks! But.. this is very untrue

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

leetut [2010-08-20 21:39:56 +0000 UTC]

awesome guide image that bro, now im looking for an IR filter!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

safeye [2010-08-08 07:50:21 +0000 UTC]

I'm on the slippery road to more IR awe all because of your tutorial. Wouldn't have been able to figure out the post-processing otherwise. Much love!

Test shot:
[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to safeye [2010-08-08 09:42:20 +0000 UTC]

Ha, nice to know that even Flickr people found my tutorial. Unfortunately, your photo was too private to view (at least, that was what flickr told me). But i am sure it looked beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nefarious069 [2010-08-07 16:19:45 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much for this tutorial. I just got my IR filter and now I have the"know how" to use it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to Nefarious069 [2010-08-07 16:24:45 +0000 UTC]

Now you only need to gain experience. Happy shooting

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nefarious069 In reply to NightSheep [2010-08-07 17:32:36 +0000 UTC]

I will be working on that. Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

reksakawula [2010-07-17 14:24:54 +0000 UTC]

thanks for the tutorial, i've got question, when i take a grass picture for the custom WB, do i need to use the filter on, or just take a normal shot? thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to reksakawula [2010-07-17 14:26:54 +0000 UTC]

You will need to do that WITH the filter on. Because you would want the camera to whitebalance the ir image... not the normal image without the filter.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

reksakawula In reply to NightSheep [2010-07-17 14:31:10 +0000 UTC]

thank you , i'll try it tommorow, i just got my filter, this week, and failed to take a white tree,that's from the wrong WB i guess ? hehe, thank you so much for the info

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to reksakawula [2010-07-17 14:42:40 +0000 UTC]

yep... that's is the reason. And if you are using a regular camera where a regular UV filter is installed IN the camera, you can only do long exposure photography with IR. Because:

1.) Yes, your IR filter let only IR through
2.) But, your UV filter blocks most of the IR.

See the contradiction here?

But if you open the shutter long enough, then your sensor will be exposed enough for a beautiful photo

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

reksakawula In reply to NightSheep [2010-07-18 13:20:23 +0000 UTC]

thank you so much for the advice
i've taken some shot using the filter today, and the WB works
btw, is it true by using IR filter shot long exposure will damage the sensor?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NightSheep In reply to reksakawula [2010-07-18 14:15:58 +0000 UTC]

Actually, taking long exposure night photo's would "damage" it more then since all light is let through (incl. IR). While when using IR filter, only IR is let through.

I even dare to say that given the same amount of exposure time, when shooting the sun (don't do it... really don't) without IR filter it would fry your sensor and with IR filter your sensor might survive

So it's nonsense -_-

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>