Comments: 57
ChaosKillerGabriel In reply to ??? [2016-11-03 21:46:34 +0000 UTC]
The sdf1 called it wants it's cannons back
π: 0 β©: 1
NeoSilverThorn In reply to ChaosKillerGabriel [2016-11-04 00:22:35 +0000 UTC]
UN Spacy and SMS have built so many replicas of those cannons, y'know?Β This is probably a test type for a new variable bomber model.
π: 0 β©: 1
Koyote042 [2011-03-31 18:18:27 +0000 UTC]
Reminds me of a Koenig Monster from Macross. Which isn't a bad thing mind you. But thats the first thing I thought of.
π: 0 β©: 1
1Wyrmshadow1 In reply to Koyote042 [2012-07-10 07:20:56 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, if the Macross raped a Monster you'd get something like this.
π: 0 β©: 1
1Wyrmshadow1 In reply to MightyMEC [2012-08-06 09:25:36 +0000 UTC]
I don't think you're appreciating the size difference.
π: 0 β©: 1
MightyMEC In reply to 1Wyrmshadow1 [2012-08-06 10:50:05 +0000 UTC]
It would heart at first. But things stretch & then... ahhhhh. They'd make it work. For love man they'd make it work.
π: 0 β©: 0
DeathsheadX5 [2011-03-03 10:41:08 +0000 UTC]
Ver nice indeed, It's very VB-6 Konig Monster like, but that doesn't distract from it's inherant beauty.
π: 0 β©: 0
Morpheus2014 [2010-10-04 09:49:04 +0000 UTC]
Nice, reminds me of the SDF-1 in gerwalk mode lineart which I found on the web.
π: 0 β©: 0
gyro5 [2010-07-26 04:51:00 +0000 UTC]
It looks like Rabbit-1 or the Konigsmonster from Macross Frontier with the beam cannon set up from the Macross. Nice mix.
π: 0 β©: 0
Norsehound In reply to MorlanV [2010-07-16 11:03:18 +0000 UTC]
An hour or two? I never really time how long it takes. I start with a rough sketch, then clean up the lines before coloring and shading on a different layer. Someday I want to use 3D to enhance my drawings (for better proportions), but I'm not that good yet.
π: 0 β©: 1
MorlanV In reply to Norsehound [2010-07-16 13:57:27 +0000 UTC]
Same with me about the 3D part, when I started using Photoshop CS4, I set a goal for what I tried to do. I would try attempt it first, than do some other things to practice. Than i would get better and better, than I would be able to do my goal. I think you should try that.
Really, an hour? you should time yourself, see how long it takes you.
π: 0 β©: 0
Dairugger [2010-07-15 23:13:00 +0000 UTC]
Almost looks like a Monster with the main gun from the Macross.
π: 0 β©: 1
Norsehound In reply to Dairugger [2010-07-16 00:02:19 +0000 UTC]
Well, you can say inspiration comes from Macross yes... It wasn't a conscious 'rip off'. 'Sides, it's a one-off design that might not have even been built 'officially' in the universe *shrug*.
If you want to get technical though, the main guns of both the Macross and the M1 function differently with different visual effects. Wheras the Macross is one giant Wave Motion Tuning Fork (go look it up on TVtropes for examples), each of the barrage barrels here fires a bolt of light. Visually the charge would have been high blasts of steam/plasma/electricity coming out of the silvery vents, whereas the Macross fires lightning bolts between the prongs to charge. The M1 is also far more destructive than the Macross was, even at a smaller scale.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dairugger In reply to Norsehound [2010-07-16 00:25:16 +0000 UTC]
I wasn't implying that it was a rip off, I more merely making an observation of the similarities. But I can see the inspiration in the design.
π: 0 β©: 0
techstepman [2010-07-15 20:26:48 +0000 UTC]
it kind of reminds me of the monster desdroids from macross...and the big cannon over the torso remind me macross's forward main gun section...
big fella though!
π: 0 β©: 0
Kumpao [2010-07-15 15:58:00 +0000 UTC]
Would a scaled down version be possible in the setting? something 1.3 times bigger than a kelleg at most? If possible that might make a useful heavy weapons axel which is kind of ironic since technically any axel carrier super heavy weapons by common soldier standards.
π: 0 β©: 1
Norsehound In reply to Kumpao [2010-07-15 16:45:59 +0000 UTC]
The artillery cannons won't work at a smaller scale. All the machinery to generate the bolts, focus them, and fire them need to be that big. Ironically, even at this size it's dubious it would work. In-universe scientists propose that a much larger, self-powering platform would be a more ideal artillery weapon. As it is the M1 is still dependent on outside power sources to be 100% effective.
π: 0 β©: 1
Kumpao In reply to Norsehound [2010-07-16 20:56:57 +0000 UTC]
With that response I assume it is,to some degree, self sufficient. Should we expect fireworks from it in that state? Or is it barely capable of moving around without external help?
π: 0 β©: 1
Norsehound In reply to Kumpao [2010-07-16 21:29:27 +0000 UTC]
It can move on it's own. I didn't express it, but the design also has 'wheel feet' to let it roll along the ground without risking use of the legs- really these guns should have been on tank treads. But Axels have unparalleled mobility over conventional tanks, so the legs were put up instead. It can walk on it's own, but there's a reason why it also has an experimental balancing mechanism.
Fireworks in the state? Well, it wouldn't be met with international fanfare... the proposed plan was that it would just roam around anonymously through low-density areas. When it came to firing, power cables would be run out to it's position and hooked up.
The bottom line is that it can move (slowly) on its own, but to fire it needs an external power source. The plan drafters would have recommended a larger, heavier platform for complete self-sufficiency, possibly with the ability to go out to sea or to make it into space. Their proposal would have been a true Mobile Fortress, but such a thing was beyond the scope of what the UEPC had in mind at the time. They wanted a walking super-artillery gun, not a mobile field base (since they owned all of the earth).
π: 0 β©: 1
Kumpao In reply to Norsehound [2010-07-17 03:51:00 +0000 UTC]
I see.. Keep up I see you have a very solid universe in the making here!
π: 0 β©: 0
MechaWolfie [2010-07-15 13:04:31 +0000 UTC]
Ahem...
I WANT ONE!
No...
I WANT A DOZEN OF THEM!
Although it may be a bit excessive...
Either way, this thing is gigantic! Also awesome...
π: 0 β©: 0
TorisGrayPL [2010-07-15 12:17:45 +0000 UTC]
Cool.
This little green thingy below could say "Daddy?"
It's just looks like that!
π: 0 β©: 0
genredleader [2010-07-15 09:46:34 +0000 UTC]
Wow. That's... That's like the... "Kaiser" version of the Mark ][ Monster...!
π: 0 β©: 1
UrzuEhren In reply to Norsehound [2010-07-16 09:27:04 +0000 UTC]
More like Monster mk2 crossed with Quarter.. >]
I want one..
π: 0 β©: 0
AKIRAwrong [2010-07-15 09:33:23 +0000 UTC]
nice!
π: 0 β©: 0
tekanako-the-first [2010-07-15 09:26:30 +0000 UTC]
Awesome, I would hate to face that mecha in comnat, but I wouldn't directly because if I was coming from the moon it would just blast me to smegging oblivion. Your history is getting way more interesting!
π: 0 β©: 0
BlazingChaos [2010-07-15 03:32:04 +0000 UTC]
very big so big, cool design
π: 0 β©: 0
Chizek [2010-07-15 02:33:10 +0000 UTC]
WOOO!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
goat89 [2010-07-15 02:08:15 +0000 UTC]
VERY nice!
π: 0 β©: 0
Norsehound In reply to newtman001 [2010-07-15 02:23:45 +0000 UTC]
The UEPC operates defense satellites of their own- any rocks would be vaporized. The moon can't hope to stop projectiles of pure energy. This is of course assuming the weapon was possible.
π: 0 β©: 1
newtman001 In reply to Norsehound [2010-07-15 02:31:36 +0000 UTC]
Nice! Hopefully the defense sats can take down a really large incoming rock.
I have worked on a similar vehicle. I decided that it had to move fast and hard once it fired, the better to avoid high-kinetic-energy retaliatory fire. Better yet, targeting on-the-fly would be preferable, since it's harder to hit a moving target.
Your design is an excellent variant on the Monster. It would fit just as easily in the Macross/Robotech universe as a next-gen design! Great work!
π: 0 β©: 1
Norsehound In reply to newtman001 [2010-07-15 02:44:56 +0000 UTC]
Macross doesn't have anything remotely close to this I'd think. Though given the crazyness of some of the recent sequels (Uh... spirita energy?) I'd think my device isn't weird enough. :\
The moon doesn't really have much of a space presence- the UEPC operates a few inter-system frigates that can pretty much intercept anything shot out of the moon via railgun.
π: 0 β©: 1
newtman001 In reply to Norsehound [2010-07-15 20:01:38 +0000 UTC]
I'm glad Luna lacks much of a retaliatory force in your work. It's just that I'd be very nervous about anyone who had the capability of dropping a big (over 50 ft diameter) rock on me...
As far as Macross is concerned, my comment goes more to the machines' primary design. As you know, the Destroid Monster is a standard. That said, mounting a weapon equivalent to the Macross main cannon is NOT a standard.^_^ Such a design did rear its head in "Robotech - The Sentinels" with their "land-Macross" vehicle. Understand that my statement was not a slam against your work. The Monster is one of the greatest under-utilized designs I can think of, and I appreciate anyone who has the courage to use it as a springboard for original designs.
π: 0 β©: 1
Norsehound In reply to newtman001 [2010-07-15 21:04:36 +0000 UTC]
Things are kinda hard to do on the moon, what with no air and all. Even if the moon really wanted to pummel the earth with rail-launched asteroids, the UEPC would likely notice and have some kind of focused reaction to stop it. Really, LUNAR wants to be left alone. It's Earth that are making all the fuss of taking over the breakaway 'resistance' states. LUNAR is largely a defensive force since they have enough problems (of surviving in a vacuum) on their own.
Not sure if I'd call the Monster under-utilized, since it's the only Destroid to have repeated stardom beyond Macross (as the VB-6 Koing Monster). Still, I knew I wanted to mount this weapons system on an axel-like machine and this was more or less the result. Btw- where's this 'Land Macross' you speak of? Google wouldn't cough it up and now I'm curious. Was it ever illustrated? Or is it another pirated design like many of the mecha in Robotech are these days?
π: 0 β©: 1
newtman001 In reply to Norsehound [2010-07-15 22:45:09 +0000 UTC]
Let me see what I can do for you. If memory serves, it was published in "The Art of Robotech Vol. 2". I'll dig it out, scan it and post it here for you.
π: 0 β©: 1
newtman001 In reply to Norsehound [2010-07-15 23:57:45 +0000 UTC]
Don't worry - it's no problem at all. Besides, it might make excellent grist for your mental mill!
π: 0 β©: 0
PlasmaFire3000 [2010-07-15 01:49:53 +0000 UTC]
The SDF-1 would probably be jealous! Reminds me a bit of the various Soviet military hardware projects meant to redefine any thought of "excessively large" during and after WWII.
π: 0 β©: 1
Norsehound In reply to PlasmaFire3000 [2010-07-15 02:05:46 +0000 UTC]
Well, the inspiration vein of Macross can be traced going into this, though it's nowhere near as big or as armed.
Oddly, it's arguably more destructive since the Macross bow-cannon couldn't make craters the sizes as big.
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>