HOME | DD
NPMahoney — William Wallace vs. Leonidas
Published: 2015-07-20 18:01:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 1372; Favourites: 10; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description
When tyrants take control of ones home, no hero is more inspirational and willing to fight than these two. However, which one would win a Death Battle? Note that although there is historical evidence that these two really did exist, this Death Battle will focus on the fictional portrayals presented in Braveheart and 300. The historical figures is more for Deadliest Warrior.Related content
Comments: 7
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Honestly in my opinion, I don't think they would want to fight each other. Because, both William, and Leonidas are fighting for the same thing; freedom. Freedom not only for themselves, but for their people, and countries.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
William Wallace versus Leonidas. We all know Wallace defeated Shaka Zulu in Deadliest Warrior, so this would be really intense. Both long range weapons are rather embarrassing. It's going to boil down to which armor holds up more. With that, I'm going with Leonidas. The Spartan's Bronze Age armor was enough to tank hits from Steel Age weapons. From both Ninja and Samurai.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Well, both were brilliant in the phalanx formation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wallace would kick Leonidas butt of the earth. Wallace is flawless. He unlike Leonidas can take the huge pain. Wallace won Freedom and helped Scotland win the War. Wallace himself took out castles and forts on his own. Yeah Yeah the Spartans had 300 men. If 1000 Spartans went against 100 Highlanders, Wallace would win easily. He gave his men war and freedom. Killing every man he seen as enemy. Wallace is one of the most Deadliest Warriors ever. Leonidas will struggle to reach Wallace's face. Wallace is the bad ass in this fight.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
While I like "Braveheart" a lot more than the "300", I'll have to vote for Leonidas here: Not because I'm Greek, but because he's presented as a much more brutal and more skilled warrior than Wallace.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0