Comments: 21
PyrrhaTitana21 [2013-06-24 00:18:25 +0000 UTC]
I love this outfit
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tawnya [2007-02-28 00:43:28 +0000 UTC]
Very nice... ~leopardlady and I met some fantastic "armorers" at a Renaissance fair 2 years ago, that did a phenominal work. My friend modeled a piece and I snapped a photo of her in their leather armor.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RaenSilim [2006-09-25 21:41:16 +0000 UTC]
I'm sorry, but as a female fighter (okay, I guess I can't call myself a real female fighter... amtgard isn't as intense as SCA) I can't stand pictures of women fighters in armor that isn't functional. Sure, guys find it arousing but IT'S NOT FUNCTIONAL! Women can look just as beautiful and MORE powerful when they are wearing funtional and semi-historically/culturally accurate armor.
Yes, yes, I know it's not mean to be funtional, it's just a form of entertainment.
I'm just cynical.
However, I commend you for taking the time to make the armor, even if I'm not a huge fan, it's much better than anything I can do.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RaenSilim [2006-09-25 21:41:13 +0000 UTC]
I'm sorry, but as a female fighter (okay, I guess I can't call myself a real female fighter... amtgard isn't as intense as SCA) I can't stand pictures of women fighters in armor that isn't functional. Sure, guys find it arousing but IT'S NOT FUNCTIONAL! Women can look just as beautiful and MORE powerful when they are wearing funtional and semi-historically/culturally accurate armor.
Yes, yes, I know it's not mean to be funtional, it's just a form of entertainment.
I'm just cynical.
However, I commend you for taking the time to make the armor, even if I'm not a huge fan, it's much better than anything I can do.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ObsidianDrag0n In reply to RaenSilim [2006-09-26 18:33:32 +0000 UTC]
We should most likley talk. Amusingly enough, this was originally created to be armor for an Amtgard off-shoot game.
There IS limited protection afforded by an outfit like this, however, the skirt is actually designed for the rough and tumble rigors while still protecting the wearer. So it's true, that aesthetics were a consideration. It IS only a single point of armor, though the joke is that it's +1 distractionary armor as she's less likely to be hit at all.
But the drag0n agrees completely with the assertion that fighting women geared 'appropriately' are quite stunning in all the right ways. Perhaps you'll come back to see the hard leather version of an outfit similar that's also high on functionality while balancing aesthetics...
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Leclerck [2006-05-27 13:59:49 +0000 UTC]
Wow! forget about Xena! The real Warrior Princess is here!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NecroMensRea [2005-07-10 10:30:20 +0000 UTC]
gread shoot, great idea .... very powerful model
cu NecroMensRea
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ObsidianDrag0n In reply to NecroMensRea [2005-07-10 14:39:00 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much! Will pass word along to the model.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ParasiteGod [2005-07-07 01:09:54 +0000 UTC]
good shot however the bellypiercing shouldnt be there
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ObsidianDrag0n In reply to ParasiteGod [2005-07-07 06:06:20 +0000 UTC]
Good observation. Was a detail we discussed and felt comfortable leaving, but it is definitely open to interpretation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ObsidianDrag0n In reply to Adrenaleen [2005-07-06 14:09:13 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! Love the emoticon there. lol Thanks!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GothiquePhoto [2005-07-06 12:18:36 +0000 UTC]
You captured the model and the character well. It appears we think along similar lines. Too much great fantasy art maybe?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ObsidianDrag0n In reply to GothiquePhoto [2005-07-06 14:15:27 +0000 UTC]
We do appear to have similar tastes. The drag0n will take that as complimentary, having been a fan of yours for some time.
Must disagree with you about there being too much great fantasy art. ; ) Smartass aside, it IS true though that there are only so many influences for certain things. The drag0n's point here would be about great minds thinking alike...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GothiquePhoto In reply to ObsidianDrag0n [2005-07-12 13:06:10 +0000 UTC]
It is a shame we live so far apart. We could make a great team.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ObsidianDrag0n In reply to GothiquePhoto [2005-07-12 22:04:25 +0000 UTC]
The drag0n's had the same though on more than on occasion. Might be worth discussing the sorts of things that can be accomplished at a distance.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jow---- [2005-07-06 06:43:27 +0000 UTC]
that chick could FUCK YOU UP!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ObsidianDrag0n In reply to Jow---- [2005-07-06 06:44:09 +0000 UTC]
She could indeed, but that's a different shoot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0