HOME | DD

OkamiTakahashi β€” The Lady of Wellsworth and Suddery

Published: 2014-03-03 16:22:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 5019; Favourites: 39; Downloads: 15
Redirect to original
Description Remember how I said I was throwing around the idea of her being a W&S loco with her livery being somewhat similar to that of the W&S. Well, here's a shot of her with one on the S&M (since there are literally no W&S routes made by anyone really). A little bit of photoshopping to change her kinda pinkish-purple red to a darker crimson and viola- We have a new W&S loco.

Lady model by
Colin the W&S Peckett by
Related content
Comments: 65

OkamiTakahashi In reply to ??? [2021-08-18 03:36:14 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Fatlover68938 In reply to OkamiTakahashi [2023-12-03 13:19:32 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OkamiTakahashi In reply to Fatlover68938 [2024-01-13 00:28:40 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Fatlover68938 In reply to OkamiTakahashi [2023-12-02 22:26:16 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

patychavo In reply to Fatlover68938 [2024-02-04 23:21:12 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

OkamiTakahashi In reply to Fatlover68938 [2024-01-13 00:29:12 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fatlover68938 In reply to OkamiTakahashi [2024-01-13 00:29:34 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OkamiTakahashi In reply to Fatlover68938 [2024-01-13 00:30:51 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EuanM1 [2015-07-24 17:14:26 +0000 UTC]

You'd think that this was Lady's lie before her crash.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CreativeChick614 [2014-08-15 13:14:25 +0000 UTC]

I love Lady's maroon paintwork!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OkamiTakahashi In reply to CreativeChick614 [2014-08-15 18:44:45 +0000 UTC]

It's photoshopped but thanks, I tried to get it as good-looking as I could.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Fatlover68938 In reply to OkamiTakahashi [2023-12-08 12:28:35 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OkamiTakahashi In reply to Fatlover68938 [2024-01-13 00:45:38 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CreativeChick614 In reply to OkamiTakahashi [2014-08-15 20:06:35 +0000 UTC]

Well you did a good job!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-03-11 20:24:56 +0000 UTC]

Lady should really have a place to work on Sodor, instead of spreading gold dust on her magic railway!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

CreativeChick614 In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-08-22 04:46:10 +0000 UTC]

Lady can work in the mountains like she did in Calling All Engines.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to CreativeChick614 [2014-08-22 05:10:53 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, instead of working on a magic railway near an American mountain.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreativeChick614 In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-08-22 13:10:54 +0000 UTC]

Or instead of being called 'The Magical Railroad', it can be a lost railway.
That way I'll be more realistic,but that's just me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to CreativeChick614 [2014-08-22 15:28:27 +0000 UTC]

A BRITISH lost railway.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreativeChick614 In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-08-22 15:46:49 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, that way, Lady would have a much bigger role than she did in the movie.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to CreativeChick614 [2014-08-22 15:59:51 +0000 UTC]

And instead of Lady being a magical engine, she could have been a normal lost engine, but no. Britt Allcroft would have to go with Lady being magical. Whoever heard of a train that can do magic?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreativeChick614 In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-08-22 16:07:30 +0000 UTC]

I'm very fond of Lady, but her being a magical engine is something Disney would outta do.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to CreativeChick614 [2014-08-22 16:28:56 +0000 UTC]

Plus, if Lady had a true persona, she would have been the most interesting. But alas, she has been my least favourite alongside Splatter and Dodge, who are typical goofy Hollywood sidekicks. Diesel 10 on the other hand has improved in Season 17, watch The Missing Christmas Decorations.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreativeChick614 In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-08-22 17:49:49 +0000 UTC]

I understand about Lady being one your least favorites, not everyone has to like her if they don't want to, same with the other engines. Heck, there are some characters I don't evenΒ like because they either have no personality flaws and/or being a rip-off of another character that appeared before them.

If I were able to give Lady true personality traits,Β it will be these:

Loyal
A bit of sarcasm( I don't really know why but, we need a sarcastic engine.)
Stubborn( A personality flaw for her)
Caring

I saw "The Missing Christmas Decorations" and I was surprised to see Diesel 10 in an episode, considering to be only a movie character. All in all, the episode was very good, one of the best of Season 17.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to CreativeChick614 [2014-08-22 20:07:04 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, everyone loved Diesel 10's appearance in an episode.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreativeChick614 In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-08-22 20:27:00 +0000 UTC]

I know I did!
One of my favorite parts was when Diesel 10 called Sidney twinkle-toes.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to CreativeChick614 [2014-08-22 22:27:05 +0000 UTC]

And that's how Diesel 10 became the most favourite out of all the Magic Railroad characters.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreativeChick614 In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-08-22 23:15:45 +0000 UTC]

1st place: Diesel 10
2nd place: Lady
3rd place: Splatter and Dodge
4th place: The Human Characters

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to CreativeChick614 [2014-08-23 00:23:00 +0000 UTC]

You said it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreativeChick614 In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-08-23 01:07:35 +0000 UTC]

Β 
I haveΒ a question for you:

What is your opinion on the new TTTE characters?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to CreativeChick614 [2014-08-23 06:13:04 +0000 UTC]

Some have good character development, some are poorly developed. However, I choose Billy as my lest favourite instead ofΒ Bash, Dash and Ferdinand.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreativeChick614 In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-08-23 09:46:18 +0000 UTC]

I'm so relieved that you also think some of the characters are poorly developed.
Because I think none of them stands out and have little to no personality flaw(s).
I also agree with you about Billy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to CreativeChick614 [2014-08-23 12:15:25 +0000 UTC]

Yep.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreativeChick614 In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-08-23 12:58:25 +0000 UTC]

All of them are just friendly and hardworking.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to CreativeChick614 [2014-08-23 13:17:02 +0000 UTC]

Correct.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreativeChick614 In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-08-23 15:05:17 +0000 UTC]

It's boring and they're all bland because of it.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to CreativeChick614 [2014-08-23 20:40:53 +0000 UTC]

Very sad!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreativeChick614 In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-08-23 21:01:17 +0000 UTC]

It's awful!Β 
They all have zero flaws and it's badΒ because without flaws fans are gonna start hating them.Β 
HiT needs to spice up their characters before that happens.

I despise those with no flawsΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to CreativeChick614 [2014-08-23 21:04:03 +0000 UTC]

If I were a Thomas writer, I could fix the personas of the Logging Locos and turn their old personas with true ones.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreativeChick614 In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-08-23 21:12:55 +0000 UTC]

I'd do that same with other characters who didn't developed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to CreativeChick614 [2014-08-23 21:27:56 +0000 UTC]

Yeah.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreativeChick614 In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-08-23 21:29:16 +0000 UTC]

I enjoy reading your Thomas fanficsΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to CreativeChick614 [2014-08-24 00:16:49 +0000 UTC]

Really?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreativeChick614 In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-08-24 00:25:47 +0000 UTC]

Yes! They're really enjoyable to read!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to CreativeChick614 [2014-08-24 00:54:10 +0000 UTC]

Aww, thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OkamiTakahashi In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-10-11 17:54:42 +0000 UTC]

I never even knew about this in-depth conversation about Lady in my comments section. Not that I mind though!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to OkamiTakahashi [2014-10-11 20:30:30 +0000 UTC]

Really?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OkamiTakahashi In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-10-11 21:33:19 +0000 UTC]

Nope, I typically don't get notices about people having their own conversations on my work. I don't think anyone except said users get notifications for that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jonathan-Asiamah In reply to OkamiTakahashi [2014-10-11 22:22:21 +0000 UTC]

I see.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Iscreamer1 In reply to Jonathan-Asiamah [2014-07-30 17:41:27 +0000 UTC]

I could agree.Β Depicting her as an engineΒ on the W&S is more realistic than being a magical engine.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>