HOME | DD

omerksx — Skyscraper Unfinished

Published: 2010-04-18 11:34:22 +0000 UTC; Views: 891; Favourites: 4; Downloads: 39
Redirect to original
Description This is my unfinished work ! it won't finish soon because i'm fed up with my computer's sloooooooooooooooow CPU!!!
Related content
Comments: 16

shutterlight [2010-07-04 18:28:17 +0000 UTC]

Hi there, nice work! This type of model consumes indeed a lot of CPU and Graphic Card capacity. I hope you created this model as a CATProduct, not as CATPart. In this case you can use CASH visualization mode with .CGR files and Catia will move a lot better.

Good luck!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omerksx In reply to shutterlight [2010-07-04 20:33:15 +0000 UTC]

iknow that but i rendered it in solidworks and saving as a CATProduct as a step file may cause errors in solidworks. Cos of that im making them as CATPart.. and making such a polygon MONSTER building as a catpart... guess how many minutes i must wait for just ROTATE the model

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shutterlight In reply to omerksx [2010-07-06 18:13:24 +0000 UTC]

Ok,then you should try to switch to a lower quality visualization, with less details, while working. It helps a bit. A CAD-dedicated graphic card also helps a lot
But why you prefer to render it in SW and not in Catia?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omerksx In reply to shutterlight [2010-07-07 09:40:21 +0000 UTC]

CATIA's render engine looks so complicated.. and you can adjust a lot of things.However i tried full+full render quality in CATIA and result was pretty bad.. I think CATIA's render engine cannot acceptable as SW's render engine.,
By the way in CATIA v6 there is a change in render engine .It uses MentalRay which has a quality of 3dsmax Vray ,but i cant use v6 properly because it causes a vast amount of RAM load. I suggest u not to use V6 without a really "STRONG" graphics card....!!!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nhan-SnakeX [2010-04-28 09:54:16 +0000 UTC]

oh woa woa~~ you made it ? soooo wonderful... look forward to the finish work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omerksx In reply to Nhan-SnakeX [2010-04-28 21:11:17 +0000 UTC]

thx!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Armadaxster [2010-04-26 09:55:12 +0000 UTC]

Hacıt, havada uçuyor gibi durmuş. Arka plana uymuyor çok fazla düzgün olmuş. PS de biraz boz onu, geçen fotoğraftan parazit kaldırıp temiz görüntü elde etmeyi öğrendim, ama görüntü bozmayı bilmiyom. Onu yaparsan 10 numero olur.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omerksx In reply to Armadaxster [2010-04-28 21:12:07 +0000 UTC]

bu en dü?ük kalite render ,
ayyyyr?ca i?im bu modelle daha bitmedi !

Öldüm ulan u?ra?maktan!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jylhis [2010-04-18 11:45:15 +0000 UTC]

My computer is also too slow and can't handle my newest projects... what program are you using?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omerksx In reply to jylhis [2010-04-19 12:31:28 +0000 UTC]

i use a heavy one CATIA (it's only for engineering but i think im the only one who uses CATIA for different purposes

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

koparal In reply to omerksx [2011-11-28 00:24:32 +0000 UTC]

no . you arent alone. i can use catia for another purpose too. Bu arada imagine and shape modülünü ayrıntılı olarak nasıl öğrendiğini ve renderlerını nasıl aldığını sorabilir miyim?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omerksx In reply to koparal [2011-11-28 07:41:03 +0000 UTC]

imagine and shape modülünü deneyerek kendim öğrendiğimi de söleyebilirim, elimde tutorial yok, imagine&shape modülünü öğreten tutorial'i olan çok site de yok, bu render'i solidworks 'e STEP olarak export ettim, photoview360 la aldım. catianın render'i maalesef yeterli değil.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

koparal In reply to omerksx [2011-11-28 19:07:24 +0000 UTC]

evet katılıyorum. kesinlikle yeterli bir render yeteneği yok. araçların yarısını çizip sonra aynalıyor musun yoksa bir bütün olarak mı çiziyorsun? yaklaşık ne kadar zamanını alıyor ayrıntılı bir araç tasarımı? merak ediyorum çünkü catianın imagine&shape modülü bir 3dmax kadar var bence

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omerksx In reply to koparal [2011-12-01 23:51:12 +0000 UTC]

imagine and shape de otomatik symmetry var. işi kolaylaştıran o

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Armadaxster In reply to omerksx [2010-04-26 09:53:53 +0000 UTC]

Only One

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jylhis In reply to omerksx [2010-04-19 14:20:11 +0000 UTC]

Ok then I don't know how to help u

👍: 0 ⏩: 0