HOME | DD
OmnicidalClown1992 — Sandman vs. Clayface
Published: 2016-01-13 16:21:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 2574; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 4
Redirect to original
Description
Marvel vs. DC. Sand and Clay will collide as two malleable villains stretch, shift and give it their all in a fight to the death.I do not own either characters.
Related content
Comments: 8
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Not really. There's nothing either can do to the other to put the other down.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sandman can't work with wet sand, clayface would swallow and absorb him
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Except I don't see how Clayface could make Sandman wet in the first place. And it's not like Sandman can't just avoid Clayface's attacks, or alter his form so that he's smaller and harder to hit (and Sandman's been doing that since his first appearance). Not only that, but Batman has evaded Clayface's attacks, so I don't see why Sandman via shapeshifting can't. I still don't see how either of them could hurt the other enough to win.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
... Are u fucking stupid CLAY IS WET clayface would just expand and engulf him sand man has never faced an opponent like clayface where as there have been like 3 different clay faces so he would have no idea he would be absorbed by clayface with little fight at all
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
....
Congratulations on being the 21st person I block on this site for having no debating ability whatsoever. But, for the sake of it, to counter your points one last time...
1. That may be, but I doubt the wetness of the clay would be enough to completely undo Sandman's form, especially when (again) Sandman can dodge attacks. And once he realizes his opponent is wet to an extent, that will give him incentive to keep playing evasive. There's also how he can harden his sand form to make himself more durable.
2. For all your claiming that, it's never allowed him to beat Batman and the other street-level heroes he's fought, so I don't see it stopping Sandman, who isn't just going to stand there and let Clayface swallow him whole. He's going to try and move.
3. Number of Clayfaces doesn't mean a bloody thing in this discussion. This is one Clayface against Sandman. So I don't know what you hoped to accomplish with this.
4. Despite your claims to the contrary, Sandman HAS fought someone like Clayface before; Hydroman. Who, being water-based, would be wetter than Clayface, and Sandman still held his own before the fight ended with them turning into Mud-Man. But that was a draw. Hydro-Man didn't "win", meaning Sandman has already shown he can hold his own against someone who is wet. Now, were I like you, this is the part where I'd resort to the kind of crass, profane, venom you used above, but fortunately, I'm not like you. Not at all.
God, I'm getting tired of debating people with on this site.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0