HOME | DD

oO-Rein-Oo β€” Suicide Pollution

Published: 2012-10-25 19:10:43 +0000 UTC; Views: 9373; Favourites: 482; Downloads: 249
Redirect to original
Description Killing the planet.

**no fish were harmed in the making of these photos.



Feel free to follow my work on , just "like" My Photography Page !
Related content
Comments: 53

PTDaHood [2012-12-25 02:05:46 +0000 UTC]

That is really some color there.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Maxikq [2012-12-01 23:15:36 +0000 UTC]

I really love this photo! Colors, ambience, concept and everything is amazing!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

coreyconway [2012-11-12 21:05:16 +0000 UTC]

Poor fish first photo on DA that got me angry & upset. Nice going

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jasjuliet [2012-10-30 16:27:24 +0000 UTC]

Apparently some of the younger users here have never heard of Photoshop. Great shot.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Veiled-Bride [2012-10-30 02:49:50 +0000 UTC]

Nice photo! But is the fish dead? D: Shouldn't be handling a fish too often, they get stressed and can die

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dawnflower8 In reply to Veiled-Bride [2013-07-31 02:08:59 +0000 UTC]

No, its still alive

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PullItApart [2012-10-29 00:04:28 +0000 UTC]

fishy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

naomicchi-desu [2012-10-27 23:48:00 +0000 UTC]

Γ© um choque, mas a foto Γ© incrΓ­vel...
Que o peixinho descanse em paz ;^;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

merve565 [2012-10-27 18:53:41 +0000 UTC]

what were you do?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CazyBunny [2012-10-27 12:45:52 +0000 UTC]

he's dead.. isn't he?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dawnflower8 In reply to CazyBunny [2013-07-31 02:09:22 +0000 UTC]

No

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CazyBunny In reply to dawnflower8 [2013-08-18 17:45:15 +0000 UTC]

really? oh I'm glad!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

lappalie [2012-10-27 10:33:08 +0000 UTC]

Ok the fact that you take photos of a dead fish is kind of disturbing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

z0pocalypse In reply to lappalie [2012-10-31 00:21:56 +0000 UTC]

Its photoshop. She took a picture of a fish and flipped it upside down using photoshop. If it was dead it would be floating.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lappalie In reply to z0pocalypse [2012-10-31 13:27:52 +0000 UTC]

ok. less disturbing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GreyCatFelis [2012-10-26 20:03:56 +0000 UTC]

Π‘ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ½Π°, ΡƒΠ±ΠΈΠ» Ρ€Ρ‹Π±ΠΊΡƒ Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΈ сраного Ρ„ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎ

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

spookykitty123 [2012-10-26 17:29:38 +0000 UTC]

Brilliant photo as always - and such a thoughtful yet sad concept.
I hope the fish died naturally. If so, then that's fine. He's pretty famous with all these photos of him!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CauterizeSetsFire [2012-10-26 16:51:20 +0000 UTC]

Great concept!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

taintenjoy [2012-10-26 16:00:35 +0000 UTC]

did you kill the fish? Cause this one doesn't say no fish were harmed...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SkyLandWarrior In reply to taintenjoy [2012-12-19 06:30:56 +0000 UTC]

You can flip things in Photoshop.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

orangehamster [2012-10-26 13:41:17 +0000 UTC]

que tenso meo XD, massa!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

f-a-i-t-h-l-e-s-s [2012-10-26 09:38:47 +0000 UTC]

ugh! Stop crying about the dead fish! Look at how small he is in the first photos and then how big he is in this photo! Obviously, the fish lived a long happy life that just came to a natural end. Just because someone took a picture of a dead thing doesn't mean they killed it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Scylux [2012-10-26 03:19:34 +0000 UTC]

Merp... the Fish. If it was just effects = AMAZING JOB! If it is really dead = Ah.... NUUUUUUU!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Morgan1380 [2012-10-26 03:13:49 +0000 UTC]

I know lots of people are asking but is the fish dead? Good shot by the way

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LucasInGreen [2012-10-26 02:37:02 +0000 UTC]

Is the fish dead....?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Cordeiliah [2012-10-26 01:18:03 +0000 UTC]

aw fishie
D:>
u didnt kill him for purpose of this picture did u?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SkyLandWarrior In reply to Cordeiliah [2012-12-19 06:31:29 +0000 UTC]

You can flip images in Photoshop xD The fish is probably fine. They said no fish were harmed for this.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Cordeiliah In reply to SkyLandWarrior [2012-12-20 03:32:30 +0000 UTC]

good cuz i care for fishies ^.^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SkyLandWarrior In reply to Cordeiliah [2012-12-20 03:47:12 +0000 UTC]

Same C:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Xrooven [2012-10-26 01:01:55 +0000 UTC]

Is it dead?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PrinzNero [2012-10-26 00:00:02 +0000 UTC]

fishy, noooooooo ;__;

great shot btw q_q

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kai-ni [2012-10-25 23:12:56 +0000 UTC]

Um... you know it's natural for a lake to look like that right?

The alge plays a huge part in keeping the water oxygenated. If the green alge was removed THEN everything in the lake would die.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 4

XxSilverMoonFoxX In reply to Kai-ni [2012-10-26 16:19:18 +0000 UTC]

Actually I wouldn't necessarily say that's natural. Lakes should not be a green color or covered with thick algae mats. It's true that algae can help contribute to dissolved oxygen in water but it can also greatly deplete it too via algae blooms. Excessive algae blocks out the sun for aquatic grasses as well as exerting an increased biochemical oxygen demand when being decomposed, which can cause dead zones.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

f-a-i-t-h-l-e-s-s In reply to Kai-ni [2012-10-26 09:30:15 +0000 UTC]

That isn't just algae tho. Don't you see the oil swirls?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Dancing-Jebus In reply to Kai-ni [2012-10-26 01:45:35 +0000 UTC]

true, however a lot of our water has a large oil filament on top due to natural pollution, but mainly due to humans polluting the world.
Maybe the main idea isnt about what the water has in it, rather that if you were a fish - would you enjoy swimming in water that dirty?
As a human, would you swim in water that dirty?


Or maybe the idea is that we coddle our pets so much with cleanliness, that we kill them, and they'd just rather live in their natural habitat or algae filled lakes and ponds.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kai-ni In reply to Dancing-Jebus [2012-10-26 01:59:39 +0000 UTC]

I'm just pointing out what is PICTURED is not pollution at all, it's natural. So the title and supposed meaning is quite silly to me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Cordeiliah In reply to Kai-ni [2012-10-26 01:18:54 +0000 UTC]

ur cool dude :3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Snaffeine In reply to Cordeiliah [2012-10-26 01:26:24 +0000 UTC]

If you actually study the picture you can see that it isn't being held over a lake. It seems to me to be a hard surface, seeing as it isn't reflected as it would be in actual water (I believe it's a shadow), nor does it have very convincing liquid like properties.

Anyway, great piece of art

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

IkariK In reply to Snaffeine [2012-10-26 03:18:41 +0000 UTC]

it's still water, it does the same thing when it's not moving, and if it's slightly shading, only close things would get reflected

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

IkariK In reply to IkariK [2012-10-26 03:20:28 +0000 UTC]

shady*
the slight reflection makes it look like a shadow cause the light isn't really reflecting it, you're just blocking even more light so it's darker there, you can see sticks poking out with the water sitting around it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Demonessie In reply to Snaffeine [2012-10-26 01:37:24 +0000 UTC]

I think that IS water ovo

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Snaffeine In reply to Demonessie [2012-10-26 01:54:31 +0000 UTC]

Who knows, hahah

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

0ddFoxx [2012-10-25 23:02:27 +0000 UTC]

I really hope that fishie isn't dead, but other than that I really like the photo, the concept of it is pretty cool and I love how the veins in your hand pop out!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ariamisu [2012-10-25 22:40:26 +0000 UTC]

I-it doesn't say no fish were harmed in the making of these photos like the others ;u;
Is it dead? ;v;
Very nice shot, t-though

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Smotsmanta [2012-10-25 21:24:15 +0000 UTC]

How did the fish die?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GsnArt [2012-10-25 21:05:49 +0000 UTC]

U Really Killed That Fish ? ¬¬
if you dont nice shot...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

davincipoppalag [2012-10-25 20:30:39 +0000 UTC]

very effective

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EveOops [2012-10-25 20:29:51 +0000 UTC]

don't tell me you killed an innocent fish to make this photo? ??? ???!?!?!? T^T

;-;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

forestchild776 [2012-10-25 19:50:19 +0000 UTC]

*A*!!!!! so big

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BlackNightingGale [2012-10-25 19:48:23 +0000 UTC]

Carlos, you fish murderer!! (Just kidding, of course.) Fabulous colors!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>