HOME | DD
OrderOfTheNewWorld β Buisness As Usual
#america #christmas #fairies #fake #father #lies #monsters #propaganda #terror
Published: 2014-10-28 08:53:41 +0000 UTC; Views: 1181; Favourites: 23; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description
As children we believed in Father Christmas, horrible monsters and fairies. As adults, we still believe in horrible monsters because the media keeps us believing in them. All throughout history there has been a manufactured enemy, and these 'enemies' keep the paradigm protected. For the big banks and corporations, it's business as usual.www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfEBu⦠- All Wars Are Bankers' Wars - a great presentation on the history of banking-wars in America. I recommend having a good look.
Related content
Comments: 51
Making shit up about the US without any proof to deflect any blame from your Muslims masters.
π: 0 β©: 0
Oh god, now I'm gonna go rethink my entire perception/reflection on my home country.
No seriously, I'm just going to go do that.
π: 0 β©: 1
Glad to hear it!
π: 0 β©: 0
exactly the reason why we don't need another Bush in my country. we had two of them already!
π: 0 β©: 1
Indeed. But, as in all countries, each political puppet is replaced by a new one, to serve the interests of their elite paymasters.
π: 0 β©: 0
There need to be a war on world I guess... USA is making sure it is everywhere else than on their land.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
We are indoctrinated to believe in monsters and fairies, so the masses embrace the idea of war.
There is no threat to America from terrorists because if terrorists were that concerned about 'freedom' they would attack other countries that are just as free as America, if not more so.
The political puppets that work for the bankers have no loyalty to their people. They tell the people whatever they think they need to hear.
π: 0 β©: 0
But is it because of the fact that its in 75 conflicts that the USA doesn't appear threatened? Makes you wonder doesn't it
π: 0 β©: 1
I think it's all a farce. America wouldn't be under attack anyway.
I can't believe that 'terrorists' would be so concerned with America's freedoms to the point that they need to attack it. The story is ridiculous.
Why would anyone on the planet be concerned with America so much? There are many countries out there that are more free than America, and they don't get attacked.
I just can't believe that the war on terror is real - it's just a conspiracy theory, cooked up by the government and media on behalf of the financial masters that govern the planet.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well the USA is currently the only superpower in the world right now and is consider to be the face of the west, and considering how much the terrorist hate the West because of the fact the extremist can't handle our lifestyle I'm not surprise the terrorist want to attack us that badly
π: 0 β©: 1
I just can't believe that narrative though. If the 'terrorists' were so jealous of the freedom, why don't they just create their own?
Also, I would imagine that they would in reality think the west is a corporate joke and would want nothing to do with it's lifestyle. I just think it's too unbelievable to be honest.
I don't think there are any terrorist attacks on America, there are only false flags. Without a shred of proof for the existence of these 'monsters' I simply can't take any of it seriously.
Hitler did the same thing when he told the Germans that Poland was going to invade them.
Until I see some CCTV, or a few public witnesses revealing these terrorists in action, then they are no more real than fairies and goblins to me.
there still is NO CCTV on all these terrorists, yet in the UK especially, there are camera's everywhere, as there has been for about 50 to 20 years.
If there were terrorists in the west, there would be terror-events on a weekly basis, with hijackings, bombings etc etc. When the IRA were active, they bombed regularly, and admitted it.
When terrorists bomb the west, no one claims responsibility for it and no one ever see's them doing it.
We were told about Osama and the 19 terrorists on 9/11, but then the BBC reported that 7 of them are still alive and Dick Cheney admitted Osama wasn't responsible for 9/11 afteral. So, who WAS responsible? I know exactly who was responsible, as we all know about the high numbers of Israeli's that were arrested by the NY police in and arround the WTC on the morning of 9/11. That information was kept from the public and the Israeli's were simply sent home or released.
Dick Cheney quote and link below.
Dick Cheney - THE VICE PRESIDENT: That's correct. We had one report early on from another intelligence service that suggested that the lead hijacker, Mohamed Atta, had met with Iraqi intelligence officials in Prague, Czechoslovakia. And that reporting waxed and waned where the degree of confidence in it, and so forth, has been pretty well knocked down now at this stage, that that meeting ever took place. So we've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden [sic] was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming. But there -- that's a separate proposition from the question of whether or not there was some kind of a relationship between the Iraqi government, Iraqi intelligence services and the al Qaeda organization.
And here is the link on the whitehouse website - georgewbush-whitehouse.archiveβ¦
π: 0 β©: 1
but... they're not 'jealous' of freedom, they hate it because it contradicts their own ideals. and there is footage of 9/11, 7/7, the recent attacks on Canada, Paris, Sydney, and Copenhagen that all have members of the public as witnesses. Also, there are often instances when more than one terrorist group claim responsibility for an action never mind none at all. Admittedly the Israeli thing is a bit suspicious I suppose, but surely common sense suggests that the Jewish Israelis would not team up with Muslim extremists, especially not against America, their nuber one backer.
π: 0 β©: 1
There is a lot of evidence for the creation of terror by the west. False flag operations are the foundation of public manipulation.
The people (jews, germans, americans, atheists etc) are simply manipulated by propaganda. They fall in line because they believe these 'enemies' are real in the sense that they pop up from nowhere.
In reality, these enemies are manufactured and funded by the same global interests that use the 'problem, reaction, solution' technique.
Create the event, coerce the puplic reaction into wanting revenge, then implement the pre-planned goal - to wage war on another country.
False-flag terror is used by all governments around the world. Without 'enemies', they wouldn't have the excuse to wage wars and 'legally' invade countries that have appealing resources.
π: 0 β©: 1
I gotta admit that there is certainly the possibility of that. I think that happened to some extent in the middle east because of their oil reserves, but on the whole I still think terrorism is real and exists, though perhaps its exaggerated by the media or something... who knows? For all I know, the middle east might not even exist I've only seen it through the media, which is owned by a select few.
π: 0 β©: 0
not under threat at all.
but 75 conflicts? don't you know its just all one big war on terror.... and drugs... for freedom!!
π: 0 β©: 1
I believe it's all one big war for order...! The bigger picture is the only real picture. Since the allies have secured Afghanistan, drugs have become more available. Freedom is an illusion, a selling point for the excuse of war.
π: 0 β©: 1
yep, i was being sarcastic.
but do you have list of the 75 conflicts that sounds a bit high.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes, I thought so 
Indeed, there are that many. In fact, some believe there are more.
Remember, those conflicts are often small operations, such as in Central and South America, Africa, Eastern Europe etc. In fact, this link claims it is much higher, but I am not sure how accurate it is yet, so would be cautious with the info as usual. www.mintpressnews.com/us-now-iβ¦
π: 0 β©: 1
Well said.
π: 0 β©: 0
I hear you have oil, I think you need some freedom, MURICA!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
i always knew it was like thatΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
You are blessed with an open mind with the ability to look at things objectively. I knew something was wrong but it wasn't until 3 years ago that I actually took a look down the rabbit hole to make sense of it all.
π: 0 β©: 1
i know alot, they are just using false flags to start wars on innocent countries and brainwashed people will believe it. 9/11 was probably the first false flag to start war. the plan was to attack something and kill billions to make the whole american nation sad and make the solders pissed off and ready to fight. it worked. solders went to iraq and killed innocents who were framed for doing 9/11 when it was really the government the whole time. just planing to do a war. same thing with the new isis thing going on. Β with all the drones the americans have you really thing isis is any harm to us? their little tanks and men with AK-47s. just one f 16 fighter jet and a reaper drone would annihilate them.. maybe if they move isis down in america they will soon lock the state down with APCs and military patrolling the streets. all an act and hoax people would fall for. and a way for the state to be locked down by US government.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
That's correct, false flag terror is just business as usual to those in power. A means to an end.
π: 0 β©: 1
yeah, people had better chances in the beginning of the 19th century without high powered weaponsΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
You are probably right.
π: 0 β©: 1
im just saying, if you wanted to fight the government the early 19 century had the best chances. now if you try it a swat team along with mace and shotguns with bean bags will nail you down. not to mention APC tanks with hoses and riot gear.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
True - we have allowed the authorities to gain enough control to 'swat' us like flies if we rebel. And it is only going to get worse. As more time goes by, there is going be less chance of a global uprising, as you said.
π: 0 β©: 1
police could do whatever they wanted to us. i dont see why they dont just make us full time slaves now. maybe its the entertainment people make. thats probably the only thing thats holding them back. after they almost taken away the second amendment people walk around with no protection at all. it would be so easy to kidnap anyone off the street in america. they have no guns, no knife, no mace. people try to think that police will protect them. which is not the case. best to carry something than to be the victim. at lease mace of a switch blade. which they made illegal.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Indeed.
Maybe it's worth arming yourself with a box-cutter? Afteral, look how much damage was done on 9/11 with them.
Seriously though, I think it's all down to a massive dis-arming of the American public, so that when the global economic collapse comes, they will be easier to throw into jail or slave camps.
π: 0 β©: 1
easier? they got advance weapons like never before. even if a guy name billy has an assault rifle the military has APCs so theres no win. they can enslave us any time they want. no citizen would be able to stop it
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes, you are right. However, the resistance will be a lot easier to handle with an unarmed nation. Also, psychologically, the disarming of the people helps to 'weaken' the confidence of them. It is a 'show of force' by the government puppets. It's like saying "we have the power to do what we want, and we want YOUR guns" etc.
π: 0 β©: 1
yeah, seems like police brutality is only an american thing though. and i dont like the looks of it. even criminals will join the force to get a free murder pass. its god damn stupid. if anything happens to me by a police im moving to Europe or something
π: 0 β©: 1
I must admit, the police brutality thing is much worse in the US compared to the UK.
However, I have definitely noticed that the same patterns are emerging here. The police are definitely 'upping their game' now, with more cracking down on 'major criminals' such as protesters.
Protesters are at the brunt of it at the moment, with the media simply refusing to report on any protest events.
David Cameron has publicly announced that anyone who questions the government is a 'non-violent extremist'.
We have 2 choices - obey the corporate system or be punished.
π: 0 β©: 1
yeah, i knew that from the start. now they shoot to kill instead of trying to use physical force or at lease tazers.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
This might be worth watching - it's a short recent presentation by Benn Swan - www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsRV3y⦠- Truth in Media: The Root of Police Militarization
Ben asks what is behind the militarization. It's not just a case of weapons and armor but a case of tactics too.
π: 0 β©: 1
i watched it. i dont see how they can shoot people in their own homes. that just proves earth is earth.
π: 0 β©: 1
We are seeing a similar thing in the UK, but no where near as militarized...yet.
π: 0 β©: 1
i imagine it would be worst over there if they started to do that.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
It's stepping up globally, slowly but surely.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>