Comments: 34
ouT-Phaze In reply to amberwind [2007-10-09 14:28:54 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, so much!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ouT-Phaze In reply to j14v6 [2007-02-08 21:41:05 +0000 UTC]
I got it =^.^= It's rendering at home as I type this message
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TaraRoys [2007-02-07 22:55:34 +0000 UTC]
Very neat!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
animebasset [2007-02-07 12:45:12 +0000 UTC]
wow...o_0 amazing.
if you don't mind meh asking, how do you get that watermark? i've been seeing some of meh work on sheezy art & i'd like to get some sort of copyright signature...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ouT-Phaze In reply to animebasset [2007-02-07 18:13:39 +0000 UTC]
There's an option when you submit it, the option is only available if you don't allow it to show the full version of the image, though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mobilelectro [2007-02-07 07:24:01 +0000 UTC]
That is definately a beauty!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RangRang [2007-02-07 03:23:26 +0000 UTC]
hmm.. i could send you the params of one i did the other day without a grain and you could compare the two? how bout it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ouT-Phaze In reply to RangRang [2007-02-07 03:27:00 +0000 UTC]
Note them to me =^_^= I've tried everything!!! The settings on this render were:
Quality: 4500
Filter Radius: 1
Oversample: 16 (Tried it at less than that, and the grain was soooooooooo much worse, but any higher doesn't matter unless I hit 32, and that's waaaaaay too much rendering time for me)
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Nestalgica In reply to ouT-Phaze [2007-02-08 08:01:15 +0000 UTC]
What's your gamma set at? Anything more than 1.5 makes a buttload of grain.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ouT-Phaze In reply to Nestalgica [2007-02-08 08:13:46 +0000 UTC]
it's at 5, actually, but anything lower you lose most of the detail...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ouT-Phaze In reply to Nestalgica [2007-02-08 21:40:39 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I fixed it, it looked the same with .2 linear on my transform with .2 curl instead of curl, but linear destroyed the grain. For some reason the gamma controlled how detailed it was, there is a lot going on in that picture, lol, so lowering the gamma takes out a lot of the detail.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RangRang In reply to ouT-Phaze [2007-02-07 13:27:05 +0000 UTC]
ok i will... expect to get them in about 9 hours because ive got school >.> i dont even play with oversample and filter radius anymore O.O
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ouT-Phaze In reply to RangRang [2007-02-07 18:15:50 +0000 UTC]
Alright, no prob. =^_^=
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ouT-Phaze In reply to RangRang [2007-02-08 05:12:52 +0000 UTC]
Not exactly what I was looking for, but I did get a pretty wicked tweak... It'll be up soon! =^.^=
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RangRang In reply to ouT-Phaze [2007-02-08 13:18:16 +0000 UTC]
sorry it didnt help much then
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ouT-Phaze In reply to RangRang [2007-02-08 21:42:05 +0000 UTC]
It's kool, as I said, I got a badass tweak out of it =^.^= It was a problem with the Curl. All fixed, though. I'll be upping my tweak when I get home =^_^=
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ouT-Phaze In reply to RangRang [2007-02-09 02:25:00 +0000 UTC]
I always do =^.^=
👍: 0 ⏩: 1