Comments: 141
Alienette [2009-06-28 14:14:21 +0000 UTC]
You're featured in my news article INDIGO ART [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
palominodweezil In reply to Alienette [2009-06-30 12:23:24 +0000 UTC]
Wow thanks so much!! Love your avatar btw!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
0xkyleax0 [2009-06-19 02:52:11 +0000 UTC]
How could anyone think this was anything short of amazing?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
brentonbiggs [2009-06-19 02:50:09 +0000 UTC]
That is so so cool!!! Awesome shot!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jasmine-Jean [2009-06-19 01:53:12 +0000 UTC]
Man, that's breathtaking... wow
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HitmanGraphic [2009-06-18 23:24:57 +0000 UTC]
very nice
just put this on a blink and white Frame
it will be nicer than it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sarah-L-B [2009-06-18 21:24:11 +0000 UTC]
Did you use an additional lens for this?
I'm looking into the purchase of an Olympus E420 or the E500, and this shot is amazing! So I'm keen to know how you achieved such perfection.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
palominodweezil In reply to Sarah-L-B [2009-06-19 13:09:59 +0000 UTC]
I'm too poor to get a real macro lens so I cheat with a filter. They come in kits that range from +1 to +10 (not sure about the +1 but something like that) and I use the +10 all the time. It's like a magnifying lens you just screw on the end of your regular lens. It is limiting but until I can afford a real one it works.
Also you have to buy the ones that are the same diameter of your lens so they can screw on.
Hope that helps!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sarah-L-B In reply to palominodweezil [2009-06-19 14:55:24 +0000 UTC]
Thats a huge help, thanks!
So its basically like holding a magnifying glass over the lens?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sarah-L-B In reply to palominodweezil [2009-06-19 16:39:11 +0000 UTC]
wow!
£12 for a filter is certainly better than the £400 lens!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
palominodweezil In reply to Sarah-L-B [2009-06-20 15:03:19 +0000 UTC]
yeah but you have to work around the limitations
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Schreient [2009-06-18 18:18:49 +0000 UTC]
wonderful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>