Comments: 11
Channeleven [2013-12-31 22:08:52 +0000 UTC]
CGI for transformation and bodybuilder for the rest.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CecakKobeng [2010-12-23 03:27:19 +0000 UTC]
I prefer combination of both real actress and CGI. Most important thing is that no matter whether use CGI or real one, the shirt ripping should be looked real and classic like Louis Letterier's 2008 The Incredible Hulk and classic 80's Incredible Hulk series.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Benin6man [2010-12-08 21:59:05 +0000 UTC]
I relatively built attractive actress with a bit of CGI editing.
CGI is massively overrated!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CarzyGoose [2010-12-07 22:32:09 +0000 UTC]
:3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nazaru [2010-12-06 03:45:08 +0000 UTC]
She Hulk has a sweet ass!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
shehulkrips [2010-12-06 01:34:39 +0000 UTC]
AWESOME!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
frontios [2010-12-05 21:39:42 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic! It had been far to long since your last She-Hulk pic! It should be you providing the art for that new title.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ProphetTenebrae [2010-12-05 17:55:45 +0000 UTC]
Not an easy question to answer. As a rule, I favour practical effects but I'm pretty sure there aren't many body building actresses... so, I'd say maybe go for the CGI. I mean, finding a woman who is 7' tall AND built AND who can act? You might as well start buying lottery tickets.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BrianThomasX [2010-12-05 13:40:12 +0000 UTC]
It depends. A FBB would be cheaper to do, like in the original Hulk TV series and if the series was grounded in "the real world". But FBB are generally not actresses nor are they considered 'pretty'. If they want to do more fantastic stories, then a CGI She-Hulk might work better. Then they could make her as big as they want and still keep her attractive... the problem then would be that she could look too cartoony... which was still a problem in the Hulk movies.
BTX
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dooomba [2010-12-05 08:07:56 +0000 UTC]
awww the hulk had kids ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0