HOME | DD

PaulAgnew — Sonic Spotlight 1: Sally Acorn

Published: 2009-05-12 02:54:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 1645; Favourites: 13; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description BEHIND THE SCENES


Like most Deviations, this has a long and rigorous story between the original concept, and the final piece. However, the story in particular is a lot more difficult than usual:


For quite some time now, I wanted to draw a bit of fan art involving a character dusting their paws off muttering (coincidently the tile of the artwork) “All in a day’s work”. Time and ever-changing schedules meant that I couldn’t finish the idea, let alone choose a character to focus on.

Skip ahead a week, and with a free slot (at last), I could tell a quick story involving a character I’d usually not focus on. They had to be female, heroic, and cunning. Optional quotes at the end of their victory gave an extra side to them. I remembered the original concept of the hero dusting their paws, put two and two together, thus what were meant to be two artworks, became one!

Really, there was only one character that fitted the necessary cunning and guile attitude my story needed. The only choice (and indeed most logical) was Princess Sally Acorn.


Right, that’s the hero’s position covered. Now, what about the antagonist?

First and foremost, I wanted Nack. He already showed a strong hatred for Sally, so this story doubled as an encounter to settle old scores. Like life itself, things don’t go according to plan, and Nack had to be dropped due to a lack of resource material available to me at the time. Had I a reference to go by, the final product would have indeed been a fight for revenge.

With Nack out of the picture (and if you imagine Nack in the story, it really does make more sense), I needed a villain. Luckily, I still had a few rough sketches of Snively (what became the previous Deviation) on my person, so he was chosen instead.

The plot was re-amended to allocate his character. Rather than lure her out into the open to settle old business (which was the original idea with Nack), he lured her out into the open to easily capture and torture for information (the city’s structure of Nanites is questionable at best. Since they’re copied from A.D.A.M.’s collection, wouldn’t NICOLE upgrade any possible weaknesses that Eggman might have known?).
After re-reading the final product, I’m actually quite happy that Snively was chosen.

Researching fan art, I have noticed that some fans like to pair him and Sally into romantic (and extremely illogical) relationships. This is something of a reversed homage (although the second panel without words could be mistaken for the opposite) to the pairing.


And so, that’s how 2 original ideas were tossed and re-tossed into one.
Thanks for reading.
Related content
Comments: 70

PaulAgnew In reply to ??? [2009-05-12 23:13:40 +0000 UTC]

Kudos.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

saffronpanther [2009-05-12 02:56:12 +0000 UTC]

Nicely done.
Sally is so awesome here.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-12 05:54:52 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I've always viewed Sally as an awesome character and able to use her power of speech to get out of many tight situations. As seen above, is an example of her power.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-12 05:55:52 +0000 UTC]

She is an excellent character indeed. I always hate the Sally bashing when she is clearly skilled such as what you indicated.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-12 06:07:53 +0000 UTC]

Sally has many positive character traits that aren't explored enough. All that wasted potential. She's pretty much the very backbone of the Freedom Fighters. Without her, there'd be disarray (or Antonie as leader, but it's obvious where that would end up), giving Robotnik a prime opportunity to win the war.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-12 06:09:48 +0000 UTC]

She has so much potential as a character. Really you've said everything I could think of.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-12 23:07:44 +0000 UTC]

One day maybe, there will be more of Sally's characteristics and abilities explored. But until then, there's always fanwork.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 02:15:51 +0000 UTC]

Of course.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 02:20:55 +0000 UTC]

Although it's common for some fans to go overboard and do, well....I'd rather not discuss the results.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 02:21:52 +0000 UTC]

And I won't make you either.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 02:49:41 +0000 UTC]

Oh good. Some of the images I've seen are really, REALLY disturbing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 02:50:18 +0000 UTC]

I can image. I have seen some nasty stuff as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 02:58:54 +0000 UTC]

Shame is, not one character is immune from any universe.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 03:00:02 +0000 UTC]

So sadly true.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 03:03:59 +0000 UTC]

It's not just the characters, it's the pairings themselves. What part of the mind instructs them to draw that?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 03:06:27 +0000 UTC]

A great many things unfortunately. Defensive favoritism, character hatred, mythos loyalty (like to the comic or game), etc.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 03:25:21 +0000 UTC]

Ultimately, it's all Sonic, the Hedgehog we all know and love. Sure we have our opinions over these fictional characters, but are they really worth verbal wars over at the end of the day?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 03:28:34 +0000 UTC]

To some people, that constitutes their whole Internet lives.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 03:33:21 +0000 UTC]

Isn't there a thing out that window nearby called 'The Real World'? I wish some fans would notice it more often.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 03:36:05 +0000 UTC]

Maybe they don't want to. Or maybe The Real World is there where they are. People have funny definitions of what The Real World is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 03:45:14 +0000 UTC]

I mean everything outside a house. Parks, trains, stores, people.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 03:45:54 +0000 UTC]

I see what you mean. I was thinking more in the psychological sense.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 03:58:33 +0000 UTC]

Ah yes, that too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 03:59:38 +0000 UTC]

Yes, because you'll always have people denying this is the real world. Then again, after "The Matrix", some people aren't sure.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 04:11:20 +0000 UTC]

Don't foget the possibilities of alternate realities.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 04:12:53 +0000 UTC]

Of course. I believe in that possibility.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 04:16:11 +0000 UTC]

Who knows, it's always possible they exist.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 04:18:27 +0000 UTC]

I believe it. Big universe, big possibilities.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 04:20:42 +0000 UTC]

I'll buy it. Can't wait for evidence of their existance to emerge one day.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 04:21:47 +0000 UTC]

Unless it causes some problem in the interaction process.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 04:26:22 +0000 UTC]

And then we can all kiss this universe goodbye.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 04:27:40 +0000 UTC]

Or maybe a new universe would get created. Hooray for universal enlightenment!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 04:31:47 +0000 UTC]

You mean create a new universe where no-one remembers the original, like M25YL?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 04:33:29 +0000 UTC]

Or maybe just develops the universe with new forms.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 04:35:38 +0000 UTC]

Could do. You mean as in new forms of life?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 04:36:52 +0000 UTC]

New life.
New discoveries.
New philosophies.
New advancements to make the existence better...or at least suck less.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 04:42:07 +0000 UTC]

With the recession and diseases, the advancements are most deserved.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 04:45:18 +0000 UTC]

Of course. Then again, we find cures for cancer and AIDS and some new and possibly worse diseases come into existence.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 05:09:39 +0000 UTC]

Pretty much seems that way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 05:11:13 +0000 UTC]

Then again, as bad as it is, it's something that is required to continued advancing into the future.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-13 05:31:04 +0000 UTC]

As long as there are cures, there will always be diseases.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-13 05:33:46 +0000 UTC]

Of course. Then again, a lot of this stuff has been around for ages. They just weren't/haven't been discovered yet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-14 00:59:35 +0000 UTC]

Do you think most diseases would be discovered and/or cured eventually? There's no chance of ALL since there will always be new breeds. But take the majors, such as cancer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-14 01:00:54 +0000 UTC]

Most will and most won't. Depends on the variety such as cancer-it will be cured one day but new versions of it will come up

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-14 01:06:56 +0000 UTC]

Also the variations of Cancer play a part. One (such as prostate for example) could be cured, but no progress on others (i.e. breast cancer).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-14 01:11:48 +0000 UTC]

Or the variations could go further. Like say that some have specific conditions. I'm sure there are varied types of breast cancer like type 1 or 2 type thing.

I dunno really.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-14 01:16:59 +0000 UTC]

While knowing little of the subject, I'm sure there'd be more than one type. Like Diabetes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-14 01:17:45 +0000 UTC]

Good example.

Then you have psychological issues that could develop from the body and/or the mind.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulAgnew In reply to saffronpanther [2009-05-14 01:23:50 +0000 UTC]

Yes, since Cancers can be really life-changing (particularly for the worse), the knowledge that nothing will be the same again for the patient could take quite the emotional/mental toll.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saffronpanther In reply to PaulAgnew [2009-05-14 01:24:19 +0000 UTC]

Well understood and put.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>