Comments: 87
cullyferg2010 [2018-03-04 04:21:38 +0000 UTC]
Not a good thing to do. Now she has a target on her back. Or would that be the soles of her feet?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThatRedFox [2017-12-11 05:38:27 +0000 UTC]
Each and every panel is stunning in its own way, those close-ups are insanely good <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragonbite1992 [2017-10-24 20:06:50 +0000 UTC]
i love nightelves <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragonbite1992 In reply to PawFeather [2017-10-26 20:23:24 +0000 UTC]
too bad they arent real life would be soo much better XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jo-009 [2017-10-22 00:41:00 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful soles, my gossh~ ...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TicklishPixels [2017-10-18 14:23:11 +0000 UTC]
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
I thiiiiiiiink the commisioner wanted something very similar to this... xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Jengineerr In reply to TicklishPixels [2017-10-19 23:57:22 +0000 UTC]
It's the same comissioner, he comissioned the drawing from briel7 but didn't pay for it. Briel made a journal about it as well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PawFeather In reply to Sir-Bombers [2017-10-18 13:58:21 +0000 UTC]
Thanks a lot, bud. Yeah, he did a great job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PawFeather In reply to Sir-Bombers [2017-10-19 14:46:25 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, dude. Oh...how's Evil Within 2?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Palagame [2017-10-18 12:28:20 +0000 UTC]
Really good, I like it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Axel-the-firedancer [2017-10-18 09:43:07 +0000 UTC]
Briel7 did the exact same thing...kinda better than this one, sorry
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VG-MC [2017-10-18 07:05:09 +0000 UTC]
Why does blue skin with white soles work so well?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PawFeather In reply to VG-MC [2017-10-18 13:56:43 +0000 UTC]
They compliment each other nicely.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Maskedclown [2017-10-18 06:31:18 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, Ive certainly seen the same exact scenario by a different artist. How strange!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
wa55up In reply to Maskedclown [2017-10-18 08:37:38 +0000 UTC]
Briels version was lowkey better
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Maskedclown In reply to wa55up [2017-10-18 21:55:42 +0000 UTC]
I mean, that's a matter of opinion. I like both for different reasons.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wa55up In reply to Maskedclown [2017-10-18 21:59:57 +0000 UTC]
Of course it's an opinion..and just because I prefer briels on this specific doesn't mean I'm saying he's a superior artist..Paw drew make the Goth Girl laugh he's already a legend in this community of artists. Why is the Deviantart community so sensitive about creativity..I male music so I'm used to tough skin. The skin of these communities is overly moisturized to say the least.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Goofytickles In reply to wa55up [2017-10-18 23:27:08 +0000 UTC]
Uhh. What? You come in, tell him someone elses was better, he says "yeah I love Briels" in several other comments, and then you just follow up with "this guy is too sensitive! Artist are too sensitive!" You're kind of an asshole buddy
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wa55up In reply to Goofytickles [2017-10-18 23:29:54 +0000 UTC]
I'm not checking for his other comments, I only responded to the "that's your opinion" in reference to me and pointed out how every thing said about art is purely opinion because art is subjective. I also didn't say artists are sensitive, I said artist on DA are. And you are obviously exhibit A on this point. If what I'm saying is considered asshole behavior, life is gonna fuck you up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Maskedclown In reply to wa55up [2017-10-19 01:56:08 +0000 UTC]
You didn't state an opinion. You just came out and said one was better. In a matter of taste there is no real way to determine which is superior. I suppose my point is that its pretty bad form to go into an artist's comment section and kick their dog. Criticism is beneficial, comparison in matters of taste are so much jerking off.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
wa55up In reply to Maskedclown [2017-10-19 02:04:58 +0000 UTC]
And before I leave this conversation I feel like you didn't truly read my post but simply the parts that you wanted to based off of that "In a matter of taste there is no real way to determine which is superior." Comment. Right after I just said art is subjective to prove that I was stating an opinion before. That selective reading won't fair well in future arguements.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wa55up In reply to Maskedclown [2017-10-19 02:01:52 +0000 UTC]
If I have to fully state "This is my opinion" before every coment that is once again proving my point about sensitivity, and a lack of using common sense. You do not need someone to walk you through knowing that someone preferring one piece over the other is that individuals opinion. Critic is not necessary here because my criticisms were less on artistic style and form and more on the fact that Briels achieved a stronger emotional response from me. Are you all seriously that rattled by this? I remember now why I always chose to simply observe these communities instead of participate in them, and I think I'll return to that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Maskedclown In reply to wa55up [2017-10-19 02:23:10 +0000 UTC]
Neither will your spelling or grammar. My issue is not that you are stating your opinion. It's that your comment was pointless, and potentially insulting. There are ways of expressing your opinion without being insensitive to other people. I have finished with you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wa55up In reply to Maskedclown [2017-10-19 02:29:20 +0000 UTC]
Bringing up spelling and grammar when the information was adequately delivered to you..so the purpose of language precedes you..and now your issue is not me stating an opinion even though one post ago you were claiming I didn't have one and that was your source of critic. And my comment wasn't pointless, I was making the point that through my eyes it was not as good as Briels, and about it being insulting I couldn't care less. If someone with a catalogue and as many appreciators as Paws has chose to focus on my comment out of a million positive ones then Paws art shouldn't be posted publicly. I don't agree with your hand holding idealogy. You're very desperate to come across as smart though and that's pretty funny lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wa55up In reply to Goofytickles [2017-10-19 02:15:56 +0000 UTC]
...Yeah this is definitely on par with a youtube comment section lmao. You got it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lostonezero [2017-10-18 06:30:57 +0000 UTC]
wow *_*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Daluba [2017-10-18 04:49:44 +0000 UTC]
so sexy
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>