HOME | DD
phalalcrocorax β Trio
Published: 2012-04-02 15:37:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 15924; Favourites: 347; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
I showed you some pictures very similar to this one... but I thinks this is the best in the "Corvus corone over a fence"Thanks for watching
Related content
Comments: 42
This is wonderful!! Can I ask you which type of camera and lens do you have?
π: 0 β©: 1
Hello
thanks for your comment
On this one it has been done with a 5D2 and 300 2.8 combo (if I remember well). Now I use as many lenses as possible but my main trio is :
400 2.8, 200 1.8 and 85 1.2.
π: 0 β©: 0
Thanks a lot
What kind of book ?
π: 0 β©: 1
You're welcome!
I was thinking something gothic or paranormal.
It really is a great photo.
π: 0 β©: 0
My goodness, the atmosphere here is totally captivating 
π: 0 β©: 0
Absolutely beautiful. You are so talented!
π: 0 β©: 0
Wow, although the colors here are so beautiful, I would see this in black and white too, is very abstract!
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
Effectivement similaire Γ une prΓ©cΓ©dente, mais je continue de trouver la combo excellente !
Ca va effectivement très bien à ces 3 corneilles.
π: 0 β©: 0
wow this is really an awesome photo. Love it!
Love the focus on that one bird, with the blurred ones in the background. Really nice.
π: 0 β©: 0
wow that lens is AWESOME! look at the detail on the feathers
π: 0 β©: 0
Wonderful shot! They look like guards of a garden (LOL.)
π: 0 β©: 0
Fantastic, they are like sentries at watch. Really beautiful work!
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
Wow thats a great shot, looks like they are posing for this shot.
π: 0 β©: 0
i am absolutely in love with this image!! wonderful wonderful shot!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Shades of Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds! Love it.
π: 0 β©: 0
beautiful shot. wow, such a narrow field and from a distance. What lens did you use? I want it.
any photoshop involved?
π: 0 β©: 1
Ha ha ha... it is written in the bottom of this page 
In fact, it is not the lens that helped to make such a narrow depth of field... it is the 5D MkII. FF sensors are amazing for that
Thanks again for your answer
π: 0 β©: 1
thanks for answering and sharing.
The Camera Data, it have camera info but the lens info is the setting of the lens at time of shoot. So you could be using the 100-400mm lens, but than that lens can only go down to F4.
I have a cheap XTi. I'm going to invest in the 100-400mm lens.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes, you are right, that was why I told you it was written 300mm, 2.8 with a 5D mkII camera 
The XTi is a REALLY good camera, I used an even worse camera for years with a great joy. The 100-400mm is good too... but I think you should have a look to the 300 f4
Have a good evening
π: 0 β©: 1
Really the sigma can perform equal to a Canon L lens? I'm going to check into this sigma 120-400 OS. Thanks.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hi
In fact, the 120-400 and 100-400 are good lenses but most of them suffer with centering troubles. Unfortunately, you can find a really good sigma and a very poor canon, the other is true too... there is no rules about this
I checked again and it seems that most sigma are poor. I tried one that was pretty good so I don't really know if it is a good idea
I think you should consider the 300 F4 and perhaps you can add a converter
π: 0 β©: 1
I understand the L lens are mostly good and sigma is less. So I'm more likely to get a good Canon L lens than I would with sigma.
I know fix lens quality is better but I really need the zoom. At times I wish I can move closer to my subject, but like the Grand Canyon you can't move beyond the cliff.
π: 0 β©: 1
Good choice
I am sure you will make great pictures with the 100-400. I made a few and I was really happy with the result
π: 0 β©: 1