Comments: 47
ChristineWildeArt [2008-04-14 19:37:37 +0000 UTC]
Hey, looks like we found the same image of the Lambo! Nice work! Loving the background artwork too! Keep it up!
π: 0 β©: 1
Pharr0xx In reply to ChristineWildeArt [2008-04-15 13:00:19 +0000 UTC]
yes you're right! it's an awesome car isn't it? i also really like your version of it!
π: 0 β©: 0
bumo [2008-01-18 13:55:03 +0000 UTC]
love the background
π: 0 β©: 0
s42 [2008-01-16 23:45:25 +0000 UTC]
Nice, I like the background, abstract stuff like that is pretty cool. And the car is well done to. I should probably try to draw a car some time myself. Untill then, fav on this one!
π: 0 β©: 1
Pharr0xx In reply to s42 [2008-01-18 13:07:47 +0000 UTC]
allright thank you!
π: 0 β©: 0
Rastavari [2008-01-13 01:09:23 +0000 UTC]
das find ich auch sehr schΓΆn...wΓΌrde nur unten rechts unterm auto auch noch son bissel crackle-zeuch reinhauen ansonsten schΓΆn schΓΆn!
π: 0 β©: 0
Trayser [2008-01-10 23:45:23 +0000 UTC]
Oh nice vectors, lovely artwork!
π: 0 β©: 0
AestheticDevil [2008-01-07 08:48:45 +0000 UTC]
Nice work!
For a first I'd say it's pretty darn great. ^^
π: 0 β©: 0
miss-mustang [2007-12-31 07:42:56 +0000 UTC]
The background looks very cool, I also think you did a great job on the vectoring, especially for your first
π: 0 β©: 0
Savros [2007-12-31 06:15:42 +0000 UTC]
Slick work here, I like the silhouettes of the buildings in the BG. Good work.
π: 0 β©: 0
RadStude [2007-12-31 01:07:05 +0000 UTC]
Really cool representation, I like it.
π: 0 β©: 0
Jimboob [2007-12-28 14:33:50 +0000 UTC]
Reminds me of some artist, but can't recall his name.
π: 0 β©: 0
Aukon [2007-12-26 15:39:59 +0000 UTC]
Smooth, nice, and great imagination for the images in the background.
π: 0 β©: 0
ShastaMiriander [2007-12-19 04:04:47 +0000 UTC]
This is really eye-catching without distracting from the car. The colors are great and I like the chainlink pattern. In the words of my sister "that makes me want to buy that car!!"
Out of curiosity, what is the white/black stick on the left side? I cannot tell.
π: 0 β©: 2
ShastaMiriander In reply to ShastaMiriander [2007-12-19 21:07:20 +0000 UTC]
America. We use orange striped ones that are very rectangular.
Also, it just seems so three dimensional, I thought it was a photo of one and not a vector.
π: 0 β©: 0
pyangpyang [2007-12-19 01:44:51 +0000 UTC]
That's awesome for a first-time vector image
π: 0 β©: 0
IDKMYBFFJONAS [2007-12-18 23:29:54 +0000 UTC]
what does vector actually mean? is it the type of pictures that have symbols and abstract colors behind them? jw, but i love this picture anyways
π: 0 β©: 1
Pharr0xx In reply to IDKMYBFFJONAS [2007-12-19 11:52:31 +0000 UTC]
vectorart is if u take a picture of something and... well... just take some colores and try to "re-draw" the pic. u know... you try to make your picture as real-looking as possible. (but there are also vectors just in black and white- so than its not meant to look very real...)
π: 0 β©: 1
carlosnr1 [2007-12-15 12:02:15 +0000 UTC]
Cool image!
π: 0 β©: 0
VeilofMystery [2007-12-14 23:56:47 +0000 UTC]
Wow, first? It's great for the first one! Love the background colours.
π: 0 β©: 0
DanMed [2007-12-13 20:08:57 +0000 UTC]
thats an awsome layout man
vectors give you such a sleek look
π: 0 β©: 0
rdelw [2007-12-13 20:08:37 +0000 UTC]
i love the design though the blurriness indicates that this was done in a raster program like photoshop and not true vector
there is a category called "vexel" for things that are done in the STYLE of vector but not using vectors.
you can also raise the resolution and pay more attention to the quality of your source material.
π: 0 β©: 1
Pharr0xx In reply to rdelw [2007-12-13 20:19:37 +0000 UTC]
yes i used photoshop... and i dont know the difference between vexel and vector... could u explain me plz? ^^ and yes i should have picked a source material with a better quality ^^
π: 0 β©: 1
rdelw In reply to Pharr0xx [2007-12-13 21:41:24 +0000 UTC]
a true vector is a line. whenever you resize that line, the ENTIRE line is redrawn so there is no quality loss. You can resize a true vector image to any infinite size and there will be no quality loss. You need to use a vector program like Illustrator to achieve this.
Although photoshop has capable vector tools now, it is still a raster program. Meaning everything is changed into pixels on planes (geometry term) and will not resize the same. Since it is not a true vector and but is still in the style of vector art, then you have a vexel image. check out vexelove , there is nothing WRONG with vexel's, its just important to know the difference if you plan to be making them
π: 0 β©: 2
rdelw In reply to jangoeshollywood [2007-12-17 21:26:13 +0000 UTC]
i think you missed the point. it is vectoring but in photoshop (being a raster program) what it creates is only the STYLE of vector but not true vectors, therefore it is called vexels
see the wiki article on vexel: [link]
and see vexels.net
π: 0 β©: 1
jangoeshollywood In reply to rdelw [2007-12-18 17:53:53 +0000 UTC]
okok
i know what you mean but i mean ps i expensive enough xD
π: 0 β©: 0
Pharr0xx In reply to rdelw [2007-12-14 13:43:52 +0000 UTC]
gr8 thanks for the answer^^!
π: 0 β©: 0
philho [2007-12-13 19:45:44 +0000 UTC]
Good, clean work, not overdone but good looking. The work on the background is a good idea too.
π: 0 β©: 1
Pharr0xx [2007-12-10 20:06:07 +0000 UTC]
thx ^^
π: 0 β©: 1