HOME | DD
phil-cho — Manhunter (Earth-27) commission
#cho #comics #commission #dc #dccomics #dcuniverse #kate #manhunter #phil #spencer #e27 #philchoart #roysovitch #earth27
Published: 2017-06-02 13:42:17 +0000 UTC; Views: 26209; Favourites: 588; Downloads: 439
Redirect to original
Description
"Manhunter" sponsored by an anonymous backer for Roysovitch 's Earth-27 project.
Concept/Design by Roy Westerman
Character Owned by DC Comics
FB page for Earth-27: www.facebook.com/Earth27Project
GoFundMe campaign for Earth-27: www.gofundme.com/earth27project
Related content
Comments: 85
Manhunter. As in, she's a woman and she hunts man. -facepalms- What feminist BS is this crap? Don't get me wrong, I like the costume, but the name rubs me off all the wrong ways.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
There have been men under the codename "Manhunter", was it misandrist then?
It literally means someone who hunts men, namely criminals, usually for a bounty.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I never said it was Misandrist. I've never been a fan of the Manhunter title, it sounds like a villain's name. Kind of like "The Punisher" sounds vigilante and wouldn't be attached to a character who is heroic like "Captain America". Martian Manhunter, for example, doesn't even sound logical. Is he just a Martian who hunts man? Or does he manhunt martians only? This was just a little nitpick I had that sounded like it was part of a 3rd Wave Feminism due to them "appropriating" quite a few words for their own manipulative gain.
I never meant for this to be "triggering" to anybody because I had a bloody opinion that didn't sit well with somebody who didn't even draw the damn picture, but just commissioned it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, anyone who bashes feminism gets an eyeroll from me.
If anyone is triggered here, it's you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh yes, because 3rd Wave Feminism has done so much for women. Tell me, what kind of oppressive lifestyle do women of today have? Name me one right or privilege that they don't have.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
You couldn't help yourself, could you? And yes, listen to USA Today, a Newspaper that has no Liberal Bias-ohwait!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, it has a liberal bias... as compared to something like Breitbart. But then again, your average racist in Mississippi has a liberal bias as well when compared to something of that magnitude.
USA Today is pretty much as bipartisan as it gets. But I couldn't help but notice you don't deny the facts, only the source of the infographic.
Where do you get your news? The Blaze? The Daily Caller? Alex Jones?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Pardon me, I couldn't help you name off people I don't give a damn about. And partisan my ass, every big newspaper is in bed with the Regressive Left. Why else would everyone say the exact same thing despite being legitimately wrong? The Whole of Media is a corrupt, cancerous thing which is why researching on your own is a bit more viable than relying on a statistic bar provided by a Propaganda Outlet like a Newspaper that helped propagate lies and deception for personal gain.
If you want to believe the lies of the Liberal Left, that is your business, but don't bud into an actual conversation that has more merit than what ours had.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Why else would everyone say the exact same thing despite being legitimately wrong?
BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT WRONG! THEY'RE CALLED FACTS!
The United States of America was FOUNDED on the idea of the press. It's in the FIRST Amendment. If you want to live somewhere without the press, then GTFO. And yes, I'm assuming you're American because it's the only place in the world free enough for you to be so stupid.
And butting in? Idjit, this is the same conversation we were having... and what did I tell you would happen if you made sexist remarks?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Just because you use all-caps doesn't make it any more true or false, it just makes you look childish.
And what I meant was the fact that everyone would say Hillary Clinton was going to win by a landslide victory and that Donald Trump stood no chance. Every single media outlet preached the same thing. USA Today, the partisan group, was not an exception. Every outlet, no matter what side you were on, was bought and sold on the idea that Clinton would win effortlessly. But what happened? They all looked pretty foolish when a landslide Electoral College vote win went to Trump. If you followed the election during its peak, you could see how confused and flabbergasted these poor people in their bubbles feeling their whole world turned upside down. And they immediately assumed the worst that all of Trump's voters were sexist, misogynistic racist Nazis (kind of like you assuming the worst of me.) Do you know what really turned around the vote? People who had voted for President Barrack Obama, multiple times. So yes, over half of the country was pretty much lambasted because reality didn't correlate with their lying narrative.
*That*, is fact.
The Alternative Media will replace the dying Mainstream Media, that is inevitable. I never said it should be removed entirely, just that the current system has to die due to its biases ruling out subjective thinking and journalistic investigation. You know, like the old days?
I wasn't being sexist, I was being factual. Or are the supposed 'facts' only reserved for your opinions?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Only one looking childish is you, buddy.
Landslide? 2.9 million more Americans who voted for Clinton would disagree with your definition of landslide.
I assume that about which you what you put forth. I'm sure you're a beautiful snowflake like everyone else if we only would look beyond the sexist crap spewing from your mouth.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I didn't stutter. I said Landslide Electoral College Vote, which actually increased when a bitter Clinton asked for a Recount. Rarely does a majority vote actually constitute an automatic win. It's why the Electoral College Vote is usually the deciding factor.
I'm a beautiful snowman, actually. Frosty 100% of the time, thanks to the cold shoulders I keep getting. But hey, that's what happens when I don't believe lies spoon fed me by the Regressive Propaganda, isn't it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I know how the electoral college works.
You keep saying progress and regress as if they are the same thing. It's really confusing...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You're being sexist. In fact, Roy is being way too nice to you. You're a misogynistic asshole and a moron who has bought way too into the deep right and the tangerine tyrant.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
-snickers- The Tangerine Tyrant? I'm almost expecting to see a fruit basket on the podium giving orders for the bananas and apples to carry out his whims. #AllHailTheTangerineTyrant
I'm actually fairly in the middle all things considered. And I don't think trying to use slants against my intelligence or accuse me of sexism (much like you are right now) is considered 'nice'. That seems to be the general modus operandi of Feminists is to lambast and criticize anyone who has an opinion not correlating with theirs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Your expressions clearly show your right bias. Don't claim to be middle-ground when you are anything but that. Like Roy said a few comments back, "if you're going to say shit, at least own it." If you want to be alt right, fine. Label yourself as such and move on. Yes, I am accusing you of sexism because you are sexist. I am not being nice. Right-wingers try to pretend like sexism and racism are dead, which is basically on par with Holocaust-deniers, but seeing as you're a fan of the rise of Nationalism across the world, I guess you're going to fit right in with another group of alt-right Nationalists.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Just leave him alone. He's too far gone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Ma'am, I am anything but the Alt-Right. The Alt-Right didn't even exist till Hilary Clinton validated a baited comment /pol/ created and then Milo Yianopollis (a man I have many issues with) adopted cause he wanted something to jumpstart his platform. I don't believe in racial superiority, I just believe in meritocracy. If you earned something, you deserve it. Being born male or female doesn't give you automatic points, your work ethic and drive to will yourself your American Dream is the important thing.
Racism and Sexism would be dead if you people didn't constantly BITCH about it. And please, 9/11 happened and people have all but dropped the subject. It happened over 10 years ago. Imagine how long it's been since the Holocaust and people are still trying to tip toe around it despite it happening to people decades long gone. It was a tragedy and shouldn't be mocked, but people shouldn't lynch people for saying something considered not "PC". It's their business being jerks, don't involve me in it.
I'm a fan of Capitalism, to which you're confusing me with a branch of Socialism which has never worked. Don't lop me in with those violent blokes cause I am anything BUT violent. You are entitled to your opinion and if you want to view me as such, there isn't much I can say other than you are wrong.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adolf Hitler would disagree with you. He was old school alt-right.
So meritocracy, huh? What have you done? Did you tell your parents not to spend a dime or nickel on you because you're going to get by with your work ethic? if not, you're a hypocrite.
It wouldn't be dead. It just wouldn't be talked about and would continue to fester and infect, like it any systemic problem will if left unchecked... and what did you tell me about using all caps?
9/11 happened almost sixteen years ago. The Holocaust happened seventy years ago and there are still survivors from it, asshole. Another thing that has happened in recent history is actual lynchings of people just for the color of their skin, so that's really not a smart thing to bring up in this discussion. It makes you appear even more insensitive to the suffering of others.
You claim you're not violent, but your deviations are filled with violence against women; but hey if you're anything but violent I'll believe you. I have not seen anything tangible to suggest you're violent. Sexist, Racist, Homophobic, Misogynistic, Deluded, and Ignorant? Yes. But violent? No.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh, so we're bringing Thought Crime into this equation now? Because Fictional characters are involved, it must mean I have internal sexism, racism, homophobia, misogyny, and have intent of violence based on screenshots. Yes, you truly are this age's Sherlock Holmes with that logic. Ever wonder signing up with CNN? I heard they get hard-ons for doxxing private citizens because a gif was made to "offend" them that they deemed was 'inciting violence'.
Murder is murder, and should be met out with justice in a court of law, not used as social leverage in your petty argument. And just because there are survivors of the Holocaust doesn't mean people should be attacked for possibly saying something as you put 'insensitive'. They shouldn't say it on the virtue of being a nice person, but not all people are nice. You can't force people to be nice, that's pretty hard authoritarian of you.
Meritocracy as in you should work hard to get things you want. That is the American Dream of Capitalism. Families can choose to help out each other because that's what family units do. Or don't, it's totally their decision. I'm talking about the outside world away from family protection; but of course you wouldn't see it that way, would you?
I don't think Hitler is alive to validate your claims.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Don't need the man. We have history and facts to back up that claim.
You are confusing meritocracy with tribalism. If meritocracy were how things were run, we'd have a much different president.
People don't have to be nice. I'm not the authoritarian here. People can be dicks if they so choose.
Again, you only took one element from what I said. I never called you violent or said that you must be violent based on your deviations. In fact, I said the opposite. Again, that ignorant aspect of your personality shines through as your most resilient trait.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
These have their own can of worms that you can't help but open, can you?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not sure what that means. You seem to have trouble communicating your ideas.
I think I can help you. Here you go:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh that's adorable! 
And if you don't understand what I mean, you probably just can't comprehend it. That's what happens when you live in a Echo Chamber your whole life
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I live in the real world. You should try it sometime.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Tell me fine sir who lives in this "real world" what are you doing against this oppressive system that actively attacks women, cheats women out of their rightful pay, and rapes them at wartime level? Oh right you're telling some dude online he's sexist for not believing you because he doesn't like the term martian man-hunter you labeled your fictional cartoon.
WHITEKNIGHT AWAY GOOD SIR!
SAVE DEM HELPLESS WOMENS FROM DA EVIL KAPITALISTS RAPISTS!
P.S The pay gap is a myth like rape culture because both are illegal and if you had proof outside highly biased graphs drawn by a dying industry starved for attention then you could send those responsible to jail.
fee.org/articles/truth-and-myt…
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBAVnX…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wow... and ignorance reaches a new low on sooo many levels.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I took the Red Pill years ago. You should try it sometime.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Funny... I just saw a comment where you said you were in the middle-ground. Which is it then?
I did take the red pill once. I grew up in the deep red. It took me 20+ years to see the error of upbringing and get educated. I hope you will do the same once you grow up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh, that's rich. You can't help but tell people who aren't on your side to be "educated"; an assumption I'm sure that everyone who is against you HAS to be idiots, right? What other reason would you give than trying to tell me to "grow up" or "get educated"?
And I side with the people who are making good on their promises. People who follow up their words with actions. That is whose side I'm on. Take that for what you will.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You told me to grow up some comments ago... so maybe my reason is to use the same words you do in hopes you'll actually understand them?
You have failed to make good on several of your promises. For one, I'm still waiting for you to stop replying and go away.
But since you brought up your man's promise-keeping streak, let's check in on that:
How's that wall treating you? Did the swamp drain enough for you?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
-sighs- What did I say about using Regressive Left Media sources? Just because you pull this off a site doesn't make it gospel truth. Slanders and lies are the bread and butter of the Regressive Left after all.
And I didn't break my promise, you just decided to butt in cause you're stubborn.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What did I say about saying ignorant shit? Denial of facts and aggression against the fourth estate are the moldy bread of the Alt-Right.
Again, didn't butt in. This all part of the same comment thread.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Right in many states to have a say over their own bodies and have an abortion
Equal Pay
To have their rapists penalized
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rapists should ALWAYS be penalized, without exception. That is an actual crime and has nothing to do with Human Rights. In of itself, that is an issue with law enforcement that is particular to any given area and shouldn't be so widely assumed it's commonplace that every state is like Germany or Sweden where rape is left unchecked and carried out by mobs.
Abortion is legal if I recall, it's a matter of if the Government will PAY for it in abundance or make people who want an abortion for a more expensive cost. That is a whole can of worms that deserves its own discussion and one that isn't related to "Women's Rights" as a whole.
The "Equal Pay" argument is a Socialist ideology that everyone has to be treated financially equally. There's a reason that women don't get paid as much as men, and it's usually because women don't work in as strenuous physical jobs as men who make more money than more physically relaxed vocations. That's really it in a nutshell. I'm aware of the snippets of 'examples' people bring up from company to corporation, but those are fringe examples; some of which are criminal allegations and need their own merited exploration. If everyone had the same pay, then no one would strive to work harder to earn more than the other person. That is the beauty of Capitalism; unless you're not a fan of capitalism either, which then I've got nothing else to say on that matter -shrugs-
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Knowledge Bomb: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhunte…
Also, is the Martian Manhunter considered xeonphobic BS to you?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not even going to touch that one and I KNOW there's been other characters called "Manhunter". Again, it rubs off on me the wrong way when a woman has "Manhunter" attached to their superhero identity. It's bordering on the precipice of being a villain; much like the robot Manhunters were to the Green Lanterns.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You need to learn the definition of the word.
manhunter
noun
(plural manhunters)
It can also be used for someone who is looking for men for sex. Neither of these are feminist terms. I find it a much less offensive term than the widely used and accepted "ladykiller" to refer to a guy who gets a lot of action.
Manhunter has been a term used to describe law enforcement for decades. The 1986 movie Manhunter (which was later remade in 2002 as Red Dragon, part of the Hannibal Lecter series of films) is an example of this word being used to describe someone who participates in a manhunt. When you also consider the fact that she's a prosecuting attorney, it further enhances that this name is in reference to that and not some examples of misandry or a woman out to target the opposite sex.
Kate Spencer is a professional woman, out to do the right thing, despite the struggles of her hectic personal life and the difficulties of raising a child. I have never seen an example of her being some man-hating feminazi.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Didn't mean to trigger you, man. I was just saying what the title was to me. I like her costume and I like what you told me about her, but in today's culture of Oppressive Feminism it's hard for me to NOT question when something seems bias.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oppressive feminism? You're kidding me. Women have it so much worse than they have in a long time, especially American women.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
...wow, someone swallowed the blue pill.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
So you're one of those MRA twits?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If you don't know what I'm talking about, then I won't bother explaining it, Normie.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You're just a woman hating pig who thinks he's special because he's following a forum that calls for rape and disrespecting women.
Take your Trilby and go.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I think you just won a prize for that comment. Congratulations!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
... or I'm a human being with a modicum amount of decency and empathy. But hey, if you think you need a pill to behave that way, maybe you should see a doctor.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I've got nothing to say to you, and I don't need your validation to tell me if I have empathy or decency.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Never said you did need my validation. I hope you find it somewhere. Happy hunting, man! I wish you the best.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>