Comments: 8
excalibur2008 [2014-08-25 19:32:43 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I'm not seeing the resemblance to an Apple Store. And I've been in one. Looks more like the Cage bridge if they had way more money and way better sfx tech..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
excalibur2008 In reply to PhoeChan [2014-08-26 16:49:59 +0000 UTC]
Lets see, whiteish and greyish color scheme, fancier looking set up then the TOS bridge (Yes, the cage bridge was fancier than the one that replaced it), and strange looking objects on the consoles (lamps in the Cage, the bar-code reader looking things in the 2009 film). Yeah can't help but see a resemblance.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PhoeChan In reply to excalibur2008 [2014-08-26 18:01:12 +0000 UTC]
The footage for every Star Trek Series/Movie was actual the navy. For that reason they kept every design simple like on navy ships. So every screen, light and console is functional and handy. Even in 2004 (Money and SFX was way better) this tradition was kept in Enterprise.
Jar Jar Abrams breaks with this style. Bright lights, lensflares, lifesignal-screens with a screenwide of one meter are not functional. The only reason for this bridge-design is to make the stupid mainstream happy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
excalibur2008 In reply to PhoeChan [2014-08-28 16:29:15 +0000 UTC]
Yes, becuase every trek movie before this was universally loved by the fans. Everyone loved TAS, then Everyone loved TMP, and then TWOK, and the TNG, and ect.
Sometimes trek fans can be worse then the Party from 1984.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PhoeChan In reply to doubleAantylles [2012-12-31 10:25:15 +0000 UTC]
Yeah... I do too... but only with this condition: The new Star Trek Franchise is a holoprogram in the old franchise in 2380.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1