HOME | DD

photoport β€” Natali by-nc-nd [NSFW]

Published: 2014-11-05 17:14:33 +0000 UTC; Views: 49692; Favourites: 1265; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Related content
Comments: 33

Pino1015 [2015-09-03 07:02:47 +0000 UTC]

Very good , clean crisp its Β a perfect pictureΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

goddessbuilder [2015-06-12 04:09:08 +0000 UTC]

Natali keeps her breast development under wraps...till the right girl claims to be BETTER then and only then will she show off her latest build,

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

andreasD700 [2015-04-02 11:08:47 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful shape!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

User48 [2014-11-29 04:41:40 +0000 UTC]

She'll give Slawa a run for her curves and that says a whole lot! To the top, Natali.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NdrN [2014-11-14 01:56:19 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AlexanderSeaborn [2014-11-13 06:16:23 +0000 UTC]

Apart from the perfect body and flawless beauty of the model, the minimalistic setting with the white furniture background is ingenious, her pose is greatly and studiously natural, and her expression is wonderfully pure and luminous. What a photo!!!!

*slight objection, I would prefer her to be totally nude for this shot- I think the lingerie distracts from its pure beauty.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

User48 In reply to AlexanderSeaborn [2014-11-29 04:45:26 +0000 UTC]

I'd like to see her in a pair of Levi's that fit the way she curves, the top can stay too!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

quecksilber [2014-11-11 19:21:26 +0000 UTC]

what a wonderful photo, and what a beautiful lady β™₯

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sad6549775 [2014-11-08 05:54:28 +0000 UTC]

The "filter" you have been using in this series is amazing and gives a soft and innocent impression on the model's pose or action. Keep up the good work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

legolassx [2014-11-07 22:07:36 +0000 UTC]

preciosa

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Oberon00 [2014-11-07 17:57:00 +0000 UTC]

Sexy and abstract

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

S-O-G-A [2014-11-07 15:34:08 +0000 UTC]

Absolutely love this one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ace8883 [2014-11-07 14:30:43 +0000 UTC]

nice view

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

YesISaidIt [2014-11-07 05:36:45 +0000 UTC]

I wonder why a naked lady had to be in the picture. Why not just the objects? Oh ye, nobody would care if you did that. The objects are so abstract and it's up to the viewer to find a meaning in them (lazy pieces of artwork tbh). All in all, people got to see a vagina for free, that's all they care about.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AlexanderSeaborn In reply to YesISaidIt [2014-11-13 06:17:54 +0000 UTC]

Grow up or stop writing silly and childish comments on artworks and go back to your little bears and other toys

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

YesISaidIt In reply to AlexanderSeaborn [2014-11-15 00:41:50 +0000 UTC]

You wanna be my toy?Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AlexanderSeaborn In reply to YesISaidIt [2014-11-17 19:17:10 +0000 UTC]

Lol in what way ?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

stephane-f [2014-11-06 11:02:15 +0000 UTC]

angel face .... and devil's body

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

igarcia [2014-11-06 03:57:25 +0000 UTC]

Her shape is flawless and she blends in with the background perfectly. Β I'm not sure about the chairs.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BillMoisuk [2014-11-06 00:30:47 +0000 UTC]

Lonnnnng legggs and the gap

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FeiFongWong [2014-11-05 22:45:47 +0000 UTC]

Goddess!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ownlifeworks [2014-11-05 22:16:51 +0000 UTC]

Great!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BrentOGara [2014-11-05 22:05:55 +0000 UTC]

This is very interesting... all that white, and lace, and pale skin and silky blonde hair. My eyes keep searching for 'black' to offset it, but the only dark(ish) thing for my eye to 'fix' on is her... it's maddening and effective. The darkest point of the image is centered in a field of white... and that isosceles window of white in the darkness... I keep looking back, not for prurient reasons, but for visual relief.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DeusExDeviant [2014-11-05 21:47:54 +0000 UTC]

What a chassis !!! Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GrimX1 [2014-11-05 21:33:13 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful!

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sweetea [2014-11-05 18:49:31 +0000 UTC]

Did you not notice the light shines between the legs of all woman.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

photoport In reply to sweetea [2014-11-05 20:19:37 +0000 UTC]

it was white edge of beam)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Samarai In reply to photoport [2014-11-06 14:40:34 +0000 UTC]

There is no spoon...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Samarai In reply to sweetea [2014-11-05 19:07:39 +0000 UTC]

That would be 'aura'...Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Samarai [2014-11-05 17:49:01 +0000 UTC]

I have to ask.
Why is the area between her thighs white..?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

TBart In reply to Samarai [2014-11-05 20:33:07 +0000 UTC]

its an optic elusion. our brain automatically improves contrast.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checker_…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Samarai In reply to TBart [2014-11-05 22:19:55 +0000 UTC]

That's me.. an illusion.
Or was that delusion..?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Orinknight In reply to Samarai [2014-11-05 18:10:54 +0000 UTC]

oops

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0