Comments: 61
ahmetyusuf [2022-07-30 15:18:04 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 1
LETMESEEBEUTY [2018-02-10 16:13:43 +0000 UTC]
Very beautiful ππ ππ
π: 0 β©: 0
Kal-el4 [2017-10-26 09:43:25 +0000 UTC]
HOTT!
π: 0 β©: 0
RayRupnow [2015-07-26 18:52:00 +0000 UTC]
How incredibly beautiful! Beautiful model ...wonderful natural pose, light and shadows!
π: 0 β©: 0
LeonMello [2015-04-07 13:48:34 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful picture.
π: 0 β©: 0
andreasD700 [2015-04-02 11:07:31 +0000 UTC]
Very sexy pose!!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Galinas-Claim [2014-09-24 08:38:26 +0000 UTC]
What a lovely, beautiful composition!
π: 0 β©: 0
jesse00769 [2014-07-29 11:12:24 +0000 UTC]
perfection.......
π: 0 β©: 0
JoergJohannMueller [2014-07-26 20:56:43 +0000 UTC]
You show a wonderful photograph again. Nataly is such a beautiful lovely model. A dream!
π: 0 β©: 0
OcioProduction [2014-07-26 20:29:18 +0000 UTC]
such Β a Β beauty!
π: 0 β©: 0
lumberjacck [2014-07-24 21:00:07 +0000 UTC]
Nice lights and pose!Β Β
π: 0 β©: 0
ianni67 [2014-07-24 15:56:17 +0000 UTC]
undoubtedly one of the best pictures of this artist, though not the best.
The geometrical background is very well composed and studied, and the lightning is almost perfect.
The model is another example of the very high standard of Pavel.
The pose might have been more natural, thought. I've had a higher emotional impact impact due to other pictures of the same artist.
π: 0 β©: 0
IsaiahParker [2014-07-24 12:50:24 +0000 UTC]
Perfect model perfect capture.
π: 0 β©: 0
Tallon-1 [2014-07-24 12:12:06 +0000 UTC]
O//////////////////////O wow nice
π: 0 β©: 0
Octavian-the-Great [2014-07-24 11:39:15 +0000 UTC]
does not look alive. too artificial and overprocessed
π: 0 β©: 1
angelus-novus [2014-07-24 11:20:49 +0000 UTC]
oh my god, wonderful composition
π: 0 β©: 0
MAGNYFI [2014-07-24 10:13:14 +0000 UTC]
so well captured and the softness is very good
π: 0 β©: 0
S-O-G-A [2014-07-24 09:56:05 +0000 UTC]
Absolutely love this one.
π: 0 β©: 0
BS-ADOPTS [2014-07-24 09:27:17 +0000 UTC]
NIPPLE
π: 0 β©: 0
RedHoodNight [2014-07-24 08:57:45 +0000 UTC]
I like the thoughtful mood of this piece and that mood is sold by the amount of nudity shown. It's clear that this was intentional and it makes the woman seem to be either conflicted or thinking about something.
π: 0 β©: 0
yefta03 [2014-07-24 06:31:24 +0000 UTC]
oh hello
π: 0 β©: 0
bobbytomorow [2014-07-24 04:18:56 +0000 UTC]
This is a pervy observation but that breast looks so perfect that it doesn't look real, even the nipple is perfectly sized and shaped. Not saying it looks surgically enhanced more so that it looks like it was engineered to perfection from I don't know what
π: 0 β©: 0
n-l-e [2014-07-24 03:24:36 +0000 UTC]
wow!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Lekaiel [2014-07-24 03:18:01 +0000 UTC]
She looks a bit like Amber Heard~
π: 0 β©: 0
Zedrick775 [2014-07-23 23:59:33 +0000 UTC]
Very nice!
π: 0 β©: 0
Victreebong [2014-07-23 23:46:26 +0000 UTC]
This isn't dizziness, this is just a stray nipple! Lies!!
π: 0 β©: 0
PAULLONDEN [2014-07-23 23:44:14 +0000 UTC]
And thankfully no tattoo in sight....lovely !
π: 0 β©: 0
flyers1 [2014-07-23 22:20:11 +0000 UTC]
Excellent!
π: 0 β©: 0
DeusExDeviant [2014-07-23 21:11:25 +0000 UTC]
I really like this picture! Β
π: 0 β©: 0
tcooke48 [2014-07-23 20:55:30 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful
π: 0 β©: 0
Dragnmastralex [2014-07-23 19:59:00 +0000 UTC]
she looks like she has a headache
π: 0 β©: 1
RockLou [2014-07-23 19:53:39 +0000 UTC]
Must be dizzy being so beautiful.
π: 0 β©: 0
NdrN [2014-07-23 19:50:15 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful!
π: 0 β©: 0
cesar3dg [2014-07-23 18:43:17 +0000 UTC]
belly button ressembles a keyhole
π: 0 β©: 0
DannyAndYoko [2014-07-23 16:49:43 +0000 UTC]
A total hotty! ^^
π: 0 β©: 0
Darrian-Ashoka [2014-07-23 16:02:59 +0000 UTC]
I really like the curves in this shot, and I would pay for the download, but I see you set your camera at high 800 ISO and a low f/2.8, so this image would not be very clear at full resolution. Shame. Natural light is great, but you could still get this shot in full quality. It just would take a long exposure on a tripod and her to hold real still. I have found you need to shoot at f/10 or above to get a decently sharp image. Just some friendly advice. I mean no offense.
π: 0 β©: 1
photoport In reply to Darrian-Ashoka [2014-07-23 16:20:56 +0000 UTC]
I do not love short shutter speed and diaphragming strong. They kill the picture. And I do not like grain-free images. They remind to me plastic
π: 0 β©: 1
Darrian-Ashoka In reply to photoport [2014-07-23 18:08:43 +0000 UTC]
Yes, all 3 things on a camera to make a better image require more light to accomplish. It's funny you think a clear image looks plastic. I know when people use the despeckling tool to clear up the camera noise it definitely makes the model look surreal and plastic. Being able to clearly see every mole and hair follicle is not what I would call a plastic look, but quite the opposite; making them look all the more real. It is important for us to capture the original image as well as we can, since any alteration we do after that in post production eats away at the image quality.
My main point here is if you want to sell downloads the image needs to look better than if I were to just bump up the size from the smaller screen size shown for free. I have bought way too many downloads that were no better in full resolution than the smaller image, so I felt cheated. I like to patronize other artist this way, but I would like something for that fee. I am not looking to do anything with this image like print it out. just get a better look see. The agreement we have to click on does not allow us to use your images for anything other than personal use.
I tried to sell downloads myself for a very cheap price of less than 50 points, but as far as I know there were only a handful of takers, so I stopped trying to get something for the downloads. I was not even hoping to make any $ from it. I just was hoping I could get some points to give to other artists for their download, instead of out of pocket. Oh well. I make a good living with my custom copper work, so I don't mind just sharing my photography hobby with the world.
π: 0 β©: 2
photoport In reply to Darrian-Ashoka [2014-08-09 12:06:42 +0000 UTC]
I show only those images, which I like. Your ideas about image quality, I understand, but they do not interest me.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>