Comments: 35
SkyDuck [2015-01-18 07:00:51 +0000 UTC]
True dat
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KuchikiYorume [2011-07-21 08:36:41 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I made that mistake and got rick roll'd.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Teyto [2011-04-24 00:27:32 +0000 UTC]
Lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kirbypeep [2010-08-03 16:46:27 +0000 UTC]
so true!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Chaletica [2010-05-22 11:16:17 +0000 UTC]
Yes. Lots of my deviations looks really ugly and "jpg-ised" in their previews, but they look much better full-viewed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zaz14ispottermad [2010-04-22 06:42:54 +0000 UTC]
hi
your stamp has been featured in my news article which can be seen here [link]
please fave the article and check out the other stamps
and congrats on a great stamp
zara
ps sorry for the delay in this notification
the spam limit stopped me because I was sending so many messages
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
spring-sky [2010-01-18 22:15:29 +0000 UTC]
loved it.
i think I'll use it since I've got a membership now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
danineteen [2009-06-17 14:11:11 +0000 UTC]
I agree. That's why I write massively long descriptions in my artist's comments.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PixieEars [2009-06-11 10:22:35 +0000 UTC]
This is a great stamp! I so agree, full views are so important!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
piekid In reply to XiaoGui [2007-10-31 18:29:41 +0000 UTC]
Awesome, thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fraxa [2007-06-09 14:49:36 +0000 UTC]
Got to use this - I just wish everyone would look at the big picture!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
miccheru [2007-04-08 02:26:48 +0000 UTC]
I like pie.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
piekid In reply to miccheru [2007-04-09 23:45:15 +0000 UTC]
I bet it's not surprising to find out that I do too. LOL
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
miccheru In reply to piekid [2007-04-10 01:58:13 +0000 UTC]
Who doesn't like pie?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
miccheru In reply to piekid [2007-04-10 19:50:31 +0000 UTC]
Well that's good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I-is-I-be [2007-04-07 08:59:57 +0000 UTC]
PIE!!!
you are so right
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I-is-I-be In reply to piekid [2007-04-07 19:58:21 +0000 UTC]
yessums
👍: 0 ⏩: 0