HOME | DD

Porcelain-Joe — Latex_Secretary_v2

Published: 2009-03-08 20:32:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 3705; Favourites: 34; Downloads: 126
Redirect to original
Description Ok...THIS TIME I got it right

Hee hee, it's not often a drawing bothers me enough to the point that I have to re-draw it to prove I can do it right to myself.

Here's the link to Sebastian's Drawing: [link]

And no, I didn't trace it

I hope you all like this one better, I know I do hee hee
Related content
Comments: 18

TCPolecat7 [2011-10-13 11:10:31 +0000 UTC]

Oh hey, I didn't see this. And I shoulda, since that's Tasha there. ^_^

Out of curiousity, what didn't you like so much you needed to fix? (There's aspects of each I like better than the other honestly... but then, more drawing of Tasha, I'm happy!)

- Polecat

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Porcelain-Joe In reply to TCPolecat7 [2011-10-13 15:39:22 +0000 UTC]

Oh! I had to re-read what I had in the description.

I was talking about my first attempt at drawing her. That drawing I removed from DA because I really didn't like how it came out

In my opinion it really looked bad and that was because I didn't know how to draw women at all. Plus I really over did it with the latex shine if I remember right. That and there was hardly any line variation. It was just all bad

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TCPolecat7 In reply to Porcelain-Joe [2011-10-13 21:34:17 +0000 UTC]

Ah, interesting. I thought something that Seb had done in his drawing didn't click well with you. Admittedly you did fix a few errors he had in it, but of course altering it took out a few of the things he did very well too.

And as with everything, drawing the female form takes practice. I usually have the opposite problem, I draw SO MANY femmes that I barely know how to draw the guys.

- Polecat

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Porcelain-Joe In reply to TCPolecat7 [2011-10-13 23:04:38 +0000 UTC]

Ya. To think, I drew this about two years ago I'm sure I'd do much better drawing Tasha now than then It would also look very different I think.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TCPolecat7 In reply to Porcelain-Joe [2011-10-13 23:45:23 +0000 UTC]

It also doesn't help I habitually redraw Tasha over and over again.... with as often as she changes hairstyles, I just finally dictated she was bald and uses wigs. >.<

- Polecat

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Porcelain-Joe In reply to TCPolecat7 [2011-10-13 23:48:11 +0000 UTC]

ha ha ha

Or you coulda said she has a rare genetic condition where her hair grows 10x faster than the average human's

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TCPolecat7 In reply to Porcelain-Joe [2011-10-13 23:50:32 +0000 UTC]

Heh. Actually I decided it was a side effect of her early Delta Latex experiements... the nanites uncontrollably ate ALL her body hair and destroyed the follicles to make it. So she's permanently "shaved" as it were. Besides, that means she can wear hoods more easily.

- Polecat

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Porcelain-Joe In reply to TCPolecat7 [2011-10-14 03:00:54 +0000 UTC]

Hey, I like that side effect! I would love to not have to shave anymore

I think I remember overhearing you explain that before in one of Sebastian's livestreams.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TCPolecat7 In reply to Porcelain-Joe [2011-10-14 04:42:52 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I like the idea myself, tho a lot of peopel found it a bit weird. Still, I'm sticking with it.

- Polecat

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Porcelain-Joe In reply to TCPolecat7 [2011-10-17 15:43:38 +0000 UTC]

It's not weird, it's creative. I like the idea. Now if only you could find a way to market that in real life, I'm sure you'd make a killing destroying people's unwanted hair follicles

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TCPolecat7 In reply to Porcelain-Joe [2011-10-17 21:17:33 +0000 UTC]

*LOL* I can't argue that. However it'd be hard to create that sort of nanite in reality. They're still a very early science, and of course there's always the "grey goo" concern in dealing with them.

- Polecat

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Porcelain-Joe In reply to TCPolecat7 [2011-10-18 19:16:12 +0000 UTC]

Ya, we really don't want those things devouring the entire planet. Though I'm sure someone would be able to think up a series of fail-safes that would eliminate the chance of that happening.

But then again, now since I think of it, it would make the perfect weapon. Kinda scary...the health benefits are tremendous yet all it takes is one lunatic to make it more dangerous than an atomic bomb. It's almost not worth developing for that reason.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TCPolecat7 In reply to Porcelain-Joe [2011-10-18 21:12:55 +0000 UTC]

From what I've heard of actual nanite scientists talking, the "grey Goo" is mostly impossible, simply because of the sheer power demands it would take to make anything of that size, and the fact that maintaining a "form" of any appreciable size would require more energy than it would gain from what it was eating. I don't understand the math tho...

- Polecat

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Uncle-Ben [2009-03-31 07:14:08 +0000 UTC]

All I see are minor differences like the chair legs.

What's the difference?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Porcelain-Joe In reply to Uncle-Ben [2009-03-31 07:15:53 +0000 UTC]

oh I don't have my first attempt posted on here anymore because I really really don't like the way it came out. If I had it on here, you'd see the difference

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Uncle-Ben In reply to Porcelain-Joe [2009-03-31 07:43:11 +0000 UTC]

Ok! Thanks. I was comparing to the link.

Good job. Are you going to color it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Porcelain-Joe In reply to Uncle-Ben [2009-03-31 07:50:52 +0000 UTC]

ha ha...its funny but I actually didn't even think of considering coloring this one but it would look good colored. I think I'll do that tomorrow

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Uncle-Ben In reply to Porcelain-Joe [2009-03-31 08:07:02 +0000 UTC]

ok.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0