Comments: 21
Covelloraptor [2017-01-11 14:39:26 +0000 UTC]
I reckon he could use the hooked end of the beak to seperate bone from marrow.
π: 0 β©: 0
Covelloraptor [2017-01-11 00:42:54 +0000 UTC]
NoiceΒ
π: 0 β©: 0
TheHarpyEagle [2015-06-17 13:49:32 +0000 UTC]
Wonderfully thought out!
π: 0 β©: 0
Thanesdoom [2015-01-02 01:16:38 +0000 UTC]
Reminds me of psittacosaurus
π: 0 β©: 0
EnviroArtist [2011-12-30 17:51:04 +0000 UTC]
I like how you made it look bigger with the fur/feathers all over its body instead of just the arms.
π: 0 β©: 0
JakeParker [2011-02-18 12:43:34 +0000 UTC]
I'm on a dinosaur kick right now and I keep coming back to your dino designs, this guy in particular. Love her.
π: 0 β©: 1
povorot In reply to JakeParker [2011-02-21 16:35:03 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, man - I've been enjoying your work on flickr for a while now, and it's nice to know the feeling is mutual!
(Also, this is one of my favourite alternate-dino designs too.)
π: 0 β©: 0
indigomagpie [2010-06-12 14:18:22 +0000 UTC]
Well, tyrannosaur coprolites are full of crushed bone, and tyrannosaurs do have much sturdier skull constrictions than your generic carnivorous theropod. Maybe they were so successful because of better carcass utilisation? (Take everything I say about paleontology with a grain of salt, I'm a rank amateur.)
π: 0 β©: 1
povorot In reply to indigomagpie [2010-06-13 20:17:52 +0000 UTC]
Don't worry - I too am a rank amateur. That could well be a factor towards their success, though...
π: 0 β©: 0
Kazanlak10 [2010-06-02 00:45:55 +0000 UTC]
Thats a really cool idea. Never really thought of oviraptors being specialized bone crushers. I remember that Greg Paul's "Predatory Dinosaurs of the World" mentioned that therapods were less efficient at exploiting carcasses then mammalian carnivores due to a lack of bone crushing ability. I realize that your fictional oviraptorid is meant to be a highly derived member of that group, but has anyone done a study of the mesozoic oviraptor species to see if their skulls perhaps could have generated the forces required to crunch bones?
π: 0 β©: 1
povorot In reply to Kazanlak10 [2010-06-13 20:36:09 +0000 UTC]
I'd expect not - but it is a very cool possibility, eh? What if rinchenia wasn't cracking nuts or mussels at all, and instead was, in fact, a mesozoic hyena?
π: 0 β©: 0
rosutu [2010-02-05 00:16:31 +0000 UTC]
Interesting concept, making the normally piscivore or bivavevore oviraptors an analogue to a very carnivorous creature. Though how would that fare with their heavily derived jaws, and mostly-lack of cutting teeth?
π: 0 β©: 1
povorot In reply to rosutu [2010-02-25 15:48:44 +0000 UTC]
Well, the teeth-like structures are for bone-smashing, but they still sport a sharp, eagle-ish beak (like the terror birds). They'd eat with more of the pinch-tear hawk action then cutting teeth mammal action.
π: 0 β©: 1
rosutu In reply to povorot [2010-02-25 16:57:47 +0000 UTC]
I see.
π: 0 β©: 0
povorot In reply to Chimpeetah [2009-09-02 20:35:27 +0000 UTC]
Yeah - I've been thinking of small, suid-like roles for the oviraptorans, especially those in the tropics. S. America has plenty of it's own cool, weird critters to start with, though. Think of the unenlagiinae, for one - uniquely weird and adaptable dromaeosaurs.
I'll have more oviraptorans up soon, though.
π: 0 β©: 1
Chimpeetah In reply to povorot [2009-09-02 21:54:29 +0000 UTC]
Great, as for the unengaline dromeosaurs fishers are definately possibly, small vertabrate eaters known as Cockatrices, maybe even arboreal forms akin to small cats and primates (or raccoons). I can't wait to see the other oviraptorans in store as well ^_^
π: 0 β©: 0
Rayn-Hammer [2009-06-30 04:18:54 +0000 UTC]
Simply glorious
π: 0 β©: 0
Facist101 [2009-06-29 22:31:44 +0000 UTC]
An interesting concept, i also enjoy seeing reinterpretations of dinosaurs =].
π: 0 β©: 0
M0AI [2009-06-29 20:15:27 +0000 UTC]
Very nice concept. The rough tongue is a very plausible idea.
π: 0 β©: 0