HOME | DD

Preg-fur β€” Pregnant roo

Published: 2011-10-12 16:41:28 +0000 UTC; Views: 27303; Favourites: 336; Downloads: 393
Redirect to original
Description __ __

Original sketch by and with permission colored by me.

Original: [link]

Description from original: This was a little present I gave to a good friend. He had an idea of a genetically altered Roo that was born with a uterus. Oh her pouch is empty.

Geckos' note: Yes I know this picture is not biologically accurate, bite me. That's not her tongue, it's a black marking on her snout like that of a cougar.

Also, as the title clearly states, this picture IS NOT VORE! Anyone who comments below and calls it vore gives their permission to be called names such as; retard and dumb@$$

Original sketch and character is (C) of ~leovictor
Colored version is (C) of both of us
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you yourself have any anthro/furry lineart or sketches that you think would look good in color just drop me a note and I’ll look into it.
Related content
Comments: 32

pirometrix [2021-08-03 03:29:14 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EmmetEarwax [2020-02-01 10:56:38 +0000 UTC]

Ignores the fact that the joey is born as a dimunitive embryo even before the previous joey is ready to leave the pouch for good. The newborn is hardly noticeable, uness searched for.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

thebananasp1its [2019-10-12 04:19:57 +0000 UTC]

super hot

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BloodhoundPreston [2016-09-17 22:46:44 +0000 UTC]

That sure is cute. I really like kangaroos.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TimonSuricata [2015-06-24 05:42:19 +0000 UTC]

uhm, where does the baby come out from? can't see no roo cloaca! uh oh!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RGB64 [2015-05-07 03:00:33 +0000 UTC]

I thought she was overdue for a moment.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ZinaDinosaur [2015-03-03 02:05:13 +0000 UTC]

I think that Kangaroo is Not an Anthro, I think that Kangaroo is Likely a Feral, Natural-Type one.

Great Job on that drawing, I like it! As you mean by that the Kangaroo is born with a Uterus, I think you mean that Kangaroo is genetically altered to have a Complete Uterus (With "True" Placenta, like a Placental Mammal) instead of a Partial One (With Choriovitelline Placenta,Β like a Marsupial).

Biologically Accurate? It's Actually 90% Biologically Accurate, Because of only one thing Inaccurately Rendered, that Pregnant Belly Is Shaped Like that of a Female Placental Mammal's Pregnant Belly. Good thing Leo's Description said it's a Natural Genetically altered Kangaroo that has a belly so different from other Kangaroos. During Pregnancy, that Pregnant Belly exactly resembles the Pregnant Belly seen from a Placental Mammal.

As for this Drawing, This Kangaroo is Going to give birth to her joeys, In a way like a Placental Mammal does (The Joeys are Going to Come out from the Pouch, and going to be born in a normal time (The Time likely for a placental mammal's Babies to come out from their Mother's Hole), As this Kangaroo is much different than other Kangaroos. By the way, that's one HUGE Belly!

I gotta love Kangaroos. I gotta Love Big, Pregnant Bellies.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WordlessRickian47 [2014-12-27 23:54:08 +0000 UTC]

Very nice. Like the texture of her fur.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bloodking30 [2013-03-10 20:33:33 +0000 UTC]

I like it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Xarcht [2012-08-25 15:03:54 +0000 UTC]

We gonna see the little ones in the pouch?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Preg-fur In reply to Xarcht [2012-08-25 17:48:08 +0000 UTC]

I don't think so

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bubbles46853 [2012-03-13 01:51:45 +0000 UTC]

Cute! *hugs*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

leovictor [2011-11-01 13:16:18 +0000 UTC]

I love the coloration...

Again thank you for completing the picture.

You're doing a wonderful job.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Preg-fur In reply to leovictor [2011-11-01 19:01:06 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome, thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

snake103 [2011-10-12 20:52:33 +0000 UTC]

nice

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

motherabby [2011-10-12 19:35:08 +0000 UTC]

Why would anyone say its vore, and hell if its inaccurate it still looks great~!

Good job, very cute.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

ShadowedLightning In reply to motherabby [2011-10-13 03:49:40 +0000 UTC]

Easy--it looks remarkably like an image of a pred with a large prey in the stomach that is licking it's snout. If people don't properly read the descriptions/title, it's easy to see why they would think it was vore.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

motherabby In reply to ShadowedLightning [2011-10-13 03:51:04 +0000 UTC]

Then that makes them stupid, because that is still quite disgusting.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowedLightning In reply to motherabby [2011-10-13 03:57:05 +0000 UTC]

Oh, I won't deny that it makes them stupid. They really should read. I'm just explaining how it could be an easy mistake to make if you just look at the picture.

Also, some vore groups cater to fetishes besides strictly vore, including pregnancy since it involves an enlarged belly. However, I figure that trying to give them the benefit of the doubt about them wanting to add because of that is... Yeah, probably not the case.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

motherabby In reply to ShadowedLightning [2011-10-13 04:03:11 +0000 UTC]

I know and yeah I guess.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Preg-fur In reply to motherabby [2011-10-13 02:11:43 +0000 UTC]

I'm not sure, but 7 hours after posting I've had 3 different vore groups request it to be added.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

ShadowedLightning In reply to Preg-fur [2011-10-13 03:51:18 +0000 UTC]

Mmm, they probably didn't read your comments and the title. Just assumed the mark on the snout was a tongue and it had a large prey creature in it's belly.

Also, some vore groups cater to fetishes other than strictly vore, including stuffing, inflation, and pregnancy. Of course, they probably thought it was vore when they asked to add it, but some of 'em might have wanted to add it for other reasons... /trying to be nice but knows this is 99% unlikely to be true

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Preg-fur In reply to ShadowedLightning [2011-10-13 04:02:22 +0000 UTC]

I totally understand what you're saying. But what creature has a dark grey tongue? Plus if they consider the picture worthy enough to be in the group, can they at least bother to read what I wrote about it?

Oh yes I understand that too, but despite that they may have a sub-folder for pregnancy, their group name still implies vore as the main topic. and I'd prefer not to get involved at all.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowedLightning In reply to Preg-fur [2011-10-13 04:11:08 +0000 UTC]

I don't know of any, but considering some of the designs I've seen for various furs (and even non-fur characters), a tongue that color is pretty mild. And yeah, you'd think they would--but some of 'em just look at the artwork and go "oh, pretty!" without bothering with the important text... Sad.

Yeah, that's understandable. :3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Preg-fur In reply to ShadowedLightning [2011-10-13 04:32:51 +0000 UTC]

That's why I said anyone who comments on this being vore also gives permission to have their intellegence insulted Come on, it's in the title, it's only two words.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowedLightning In reply to Preg-fur [2011-10-13 04:43:03 +0000 UTC]

The sad thing is, I've actually seen a vore fan comment on an mpreg picture with "I'm just going to pretend it's vore because that's better" or something to that effect. So even if they do read, it's no guarantee they won't make an ass of themselves. -_-' And then they wonder why we have a reputation for being stupid...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Preg-fur In reply to ShadowedLightning [2011-10-13 04:50:54 +0000 UTC]

Now THAT is rude. But it would explain why I keep seeing people my work in their vore, weightgain, etc folders

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

leovictor In reply to Preg-fur [2011-11-01 15:15:19 +0000 UTC]

"I'm just going to pretend it's vore because that's better"

Actually I have people say that to me a couple of times with some of my Pregnant pics... Including Arthos and this.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

motherabby In reply to Preg-fur [2011-10-13 02:42:08 +0000 UTC]

Thats really disgusting, honestly and rude if they ever said that to one of my pics even if they werent anything close to vore.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Preg-fur In reply to motherabby [2011-10-13 04:03:11 +0000 UTC]

Meh, I know most people are too lazy to read the description, but to not read the title? That's just ignorant.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

motherabby In reply to Preg-fur [2011-10-13 04:03:39 +0000 UTC]

Mhm.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Angfox3 [2011-10-12 19:07:05 +0000 UTC]

That's okay. it'a still a work of art!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0